Is This a New Wave of Compassionate Conservatism?

In her GOP response to the State of the Union, McMorris Rodgers lays out an empathetic vision for Republicans.

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., delivered the Republican response for the State of the Union.
National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
Add to Briefcase
Matt Vasilogambros
Jan. 28, 2014, 5:36 p.m.

While Re­pub­lic­ans are not call­ing it “com­pas­sion­ate con­ser­vat­ism,” they are at­tempt­ing to take the high ground with the war on poverty. And one of the biggest signs of this push was clear in the em­path­et­ic tone of the GOP’s of­fi­cial re­sponse to the State of the Uni­on.

Rep. Cathy Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers, one of the party’s rising fe­male stars, ad­ded a caring touch to her verbal re­but­tal to Pres­id­ent Obama’s prime-time ad­dress, high­light­ing her ex­per­i­ences as a moth­er and of­fer­ing a path for out-of-work or des­per­ate Amer­ic­ans.

“Our mis­sion — not only as Re­pub­lic­ans, but as Amer­ic­ans — is to once again to en­sure that we are not bound by where we come from, but em­powered by what we can be­come,” the Wash­ing­ton state Re­pub­lic­an said.

Rodgers, who is chair­wo­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence, is the highest-rank­ing Re­pub­lic­an wo­man in Con­gress and is of­ten seen next to Speak­er John Boehner dur­ing press con­fer­ences. The moth­er of three was the clear choice for a party that struggles to at­tract fe­male voters.

“We be­lieve in a gov­ern­ment that trusts people and doesn’t lim­it where you fin­ish be­cause of where you star­ted,” she said. “That is what we stand for — for an Amer­ica that is every bit as com­pas­sion­ate as it is ex­cep­tion­al.”

The use of “com­pas­sion” in her speech might help in that drive for wo­men.

The moth­er of a child with Down syn­drome also got per­son­al when talk­ing about Obama­care, say­ing, “And that wheth­er you’re a boy with Down syn­drome or a wo­man with breast can­cer, you can find cov­er­age and a doc­tor who will treat you.”

Over the week­end, House Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an laid out a sim­il­ar vis­ion for the fu­ture of the Re­pub­lic­an Party in an op-ed to The Wall Street Journ­al, pro­mot­ing pro­grams that he said will lift people out of poverty. Part of that, he wrote, starts with curb­ing vari­ous wel­fare pro­grams and re­pla­cing them with pro­grams that help edu­cate their child and im­prove job train­ing.

So, it looks like Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers is pick­ing up right where he left off. Her tone even soun­ded sim­il­ar to that of former Pres­id­ent George W. Bush, who used the term “com­pas­sion” fre­quently. The concept of com­pas­sion­ate con­ser­vat­ism pos­its that the free mar­ket can be used to help the poor and im­prove oth­er so­cial prob­lems, like health care and im­mig­ra­tion. But the term has been used to de­scribe Re­pub­lic­ans who might be fak­ing em­pathy, gar­ner­ing a neg­at­ive con­nota­tion.

Rodgers took a shot of Obama, say­ing that his prom­ises sound good, but it doesn’t ne­ces­sar­ily help the poor.

“The pres­id­ent talks a lot about in­come in­equal­ity,” Rodgers said. “But the real gap we face today is one of op­por­tun­ity in­equal­ity.”

And though the policies might not be any dif­fer­ent than what Re­pub­lic­ans have pro­moted in the past, Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers’s speech might set a tone shift to help im­prove pub­lic per­cep­tion of a party once led by a mil­lion­aire pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate who in­fam­ously be­littled the “47 per­cent” look­ing for gov­ern­ment handouts.

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
7 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Bannon Still Collecting Royalties from ‘Seinfeld’
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."

Source:
×