Michele Bachmann Wants to Sue Obama Over His State of the Union Speech

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) (C) heads for a House Republican caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol October 4, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms
Jan. 28, 2014, 5:48 p.m.

Rep. Michele Bach­mann did not re­act kindly to Pres­id­ent Obama’s in­sist­ence that he will act uni­lat­er­ally on a num­ber of is­sues, threat­en­ing to sue him.

“If he wants to move for­ward with this uni­lat­er­al activ­ity, he bet­ter be pre­pared for the law­suit that the United States Con­gress will bring to him,” she said in re­sponse to Obama’s State of the Uni­on ad­dress Tues­day. “He may think he’s king, he may de­clare he’s a king, but that’s not what he is un­der the con­sti­tu­tion,” Bach­mann ad­ded.

Rep. Steve King echoed Bach­mann’s com­ments, not­ing that Obama has already over­stepped the bounds of the ex­ec­ut­ive branch. As an ex­ample, sev­er­al con­ser­vat­ives cited Obama’s 2012 re­cess ap­point­ments to the Na­tion­al Labor Re­la­tions Board, which are cur­rently un­der re­view by the Su­preme Court.

“He knows what he’s say­ing. He wouldn’t have to re­mind Con­gress, ‘I’m go­ing to use all my real ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity,’ that wouldn’t be in the speech. What he’s say­ing is, ‘I’m go­ing to use some of your au­thor­ity.’ So I agree with her that we need to take him to court,” King said.

In ad­di­tion to a law­suit, King pro­posed bring­ing a res­ol­u­tion to the floor of the House form­ally dis­ap­prov­ing of Obama’s ac­tions “that lists all of his con­sti­tu­tion­al vi­ol­a­tions, or at least the clearest ones — there are very many, I don’t know that if we’d ever get to all,” he said.

King said he hoped that a law­suit — which could take a while — as well as the form­al res­ol­u­tion would en­cour­age Obama to cease tak­ing ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions without con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al. “If the dis­ap­prov­al of Con­gress can’t do that, then we have to start look­ing at oth­er steps,” he said.

Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., did ad­mit that Obama does have sev­er­al ex­ec­ut­ive powers that he can ex­er­cise without con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al. “The prob­lem is, they don’t out­last their pres­id­ents,” Cole said. “So if you want to go write on the sand in the beach, that’s great, but the tide will come in.”

If such a law­suit went for­ward, it would not be the first time mem­bers of Con­gress sued the pres­id­ent. Former Rep. Den­nis Ku­cinich, D-Ohio, sued Obama over mil­it­ary op­er­a­tions in Libya, for ex­ample. But, thanks to the sep­ar­a­tion of powers, such suits are of­ten dis­missed for lack of stand­ing.

What We're Following See More »
PENCE BREAKS THE TIE
Senate Will Debate House Bill
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

By the narrowest of margins, the Senate voted 51-50 this afternoon to begin debate on the House's legislation to repeal and replace Obamacare. Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins defected from the GOP, but Vice President Pence broke a tie. Sen. John McCain returned from brain surgery to cast his vote.

Source:
WON’T SAY IF HE’LL FIRE HIM
Trump “Disappointed” in Sessions
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

“'It’s not like a great loyal thing about the endorsement,'” Mr. Trump said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. 'I’m very disappointed in Jeff Sessions.'”

Source:
MURKOWSKI, COLLINS VOTE NAY
Republicans Reach 50 Votes to Proceed on Health Bill
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
INTERVIEWED KUSHNER FOR OVER THREE HOURS
House Russia Probe: Kushner “Satisfied” Questions
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Republicans who interviewed Jared Kushner for more than three hours in the House’s Russia probe on Tuesday said the president’s son-in-law and adviser came across as candid and cooperative. 'His answers were forthcoming and complete. He satisfied all my questions,' said Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas), who’s leading the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, including possible collusion between Moscow and the Trump campaign."

Source:
VICTORY FOR GUN RIGHTS ADVOCATES
Appeals Court Block D.C. Gun Control Law
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday blocked a gun regulation in Washington, D.C., that limited the right to carry a handgun in public to those with a special need for self-defense, handing a victory to gun rights advocates. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's 2-1 ruling struck down the local government's third major attempt in 40 years to limit handgun rights, citing what it said was scant but clear guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court on the right to bear arms."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login