House Conservatives Push Back on President’s Energy-Production Claims

National Journal
Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Clare Foran
Jan. 29, 2014, 1:21 a.m.

House con­ser­vat­ives cri­ti­cized Obama on Tues­day for what they said was an at­tempt to un­justly claim cred­it for the surge in do­mest­ic fossil fuels pro­duc­tion in the pres­id­ent’s State of the Uni­on ad­dress.

“While the pres­id­ent fre­quently at­tempts to take cred­it for the cur­rent in­crease in do­mest­ic en­ergy pro­duc­tion, this is hap­pen­ing in spite of his policies, not be­cause of them,” House Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee Chair­man Rep. Doc Hast­ings of Wash­ing­ton said in a state­ment. “Des­pite Pres­id­ent Obama’s re­peated claims of mak­ing job cre­ation and eco­nom­ic growth a pri­or­ity, the real­ity is that he has act­ively chosen to ig­nore the eco­nom­ic po­ten­tial and job op­por­tun­it­ies that come with ex­pand­ing Amer­ic­an en­ergy pro­duc­tion and re­spons­ibly man­aging our na­tion’s nat­ur­al re­sources.”

Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Rob Bish­op of Utah, sim­il­arly con­ten­ded that while the ad­min­is­tra­tion paints it­self as a cham­pi­on of the nat­ur­al-gas and oil boom, most pro­duc­tion is ac­tu­ally tak­ing place on private, not pub­lic, lands. Bish­op also cri­ti­cized the pres­id­ent’s com­ment dur­ing the speech that he would use ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity to set aside more land for con­ser­va­tion.

“The pres­id­ent did get something right in that en­ergy pro­duc­tion is up, but it has little or noth­ing to do with him or his ad­min­is­tra­tion. The pro­duc­tion oc­cur­ring can be at­trib­uted to in­genu­ity and ded­ic­a­tion on be­half of hard­work­ing Amer­ic­ans and policies set in­to place be­fore this ad­min­is­tra­tion,” Bish­op said in a state­ment. “En­ergy pro­duc­tion is in fact soar­ing on land that the pres­id­ent doesn’t con­trol, but if you want to see where he really stands on en­ergy pro­duc­tion, look at his policies for pub­lic land use. To­night, in­stead of un­leash­ing the vast en­ergy po­ten­tial found throughout the 660 mil­lion acres of fed­er­al land, he in­stead said he in­tends … to lock up fed­er­al lands by ex­ec­ut­ive fi­at.”

Re­ac­tion to the speech fol­lowed party lines with Demo­crat­ic Rep. Peter De­Fazio of Ore­gon, the rank­ing mem­ber of the House Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee laud­ing the pres­id­ent for his pledge to act on con­ser­va­tion.

“Last week, over 100 Demo­crats joined to­geth­er to ask the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to use its au­thor­ity to pro­tect and con­serve na­tion­al treas­ures,” De­Fazio said in a state­ment. “I was very pleased to hear the pres­id­ent say he is will­ing to make crit­ic­al con­ser­va­tion de­cisions that this deeply par­tis­an Con­gress will not.”

What We're Following See More »
TURNING OVER 3,000 RUSSIAN ADS
Facebook to Cooperate with Congress
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
CALLS HIM A “FRIEND OF MINE”
Trump Praises Erdogan
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS
INFORMS CONGRESS RE: EXECUTIVE ORDER
Trump Makes Good on Promise of New North Korea Sanctions
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

President Trump this afternoon announced another round of sanctions on North Korea, calling the regime "a continuing threat." The executive order, which Trump relayed to Congress, bans any ship or plane that has visited North Korea from visiting the United States within 180 days. The order also authorizes sanctions on any financial institution doing business with North Korea, and permits the secretaries of State and the Treasury to sanction any person involved in trading with North Korea, operating a port there, or involved in a variety of industries there.

SUED FOR SIMILAR DESIGN
Ivanka to Court Over $785 Sandals
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS
DOESN’T KNOW WHEN
Trump Says He’ll Visit Puerto Rico
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Seated next to Ukrainian President Poroshenko on his final day of meetings at the United Nations, Trump did not say when he might go to Puerto Rico, but spoke solemnly about the destruction to an island he said had been 'absolutely obliterated.'”

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login