Ethics Group Files Complaint Over Michael Grimm’s Threats

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington wants an investigation into the New York Republican’s conduct.

A sign for the Office of Congressional Ethics hangs on a wall October 30, 2009 in Washington, DC.
Add to Briefcase
Matt Berman
Jan. 29, 2014, 10:41 a.m.

Rep. Mi­chael Grimm may not be able to dodge his threats to break a re­port­er in half with just an apo­logy.

On Wed­nes­day, Cit­izens for Re­spons­ib­il­ity and Eth­ics in Wash­ing­ton filed a re­quest with the Of­fice of Con­gres­sion­al Eth­ics to be­gin an in­vest­ig­a­tion to see wheth­er Grimm “vi­ol­ated House rules by phys­ic­ally and verbally threat­en­ing a re­port­er fol­low­ing the State of the Uni­on ad­dress” on Tues­day night. Grimm’s threat to toss the NY1 re­port­er over a bal­cony vi­ol­ates House Rule 23, CREW con­tends. That rule man­dates all House mem­bers con­duct them­selves “at all times in a man­ner that re­flects cred­ib­il­ity on the House.”

CREW com­pares Grimm’s be­ha­vi­or with that of former Rep. Bob Fil­ner, D-Cal­if., who was cited in 2007 by the House Eth­ics Com­mit­tee for demon­strat­ing “poor judg­ment” at Dulles Air­port.

This isn’t Grimm’s first run-in with CREW. The group filed two sep­ar­ate com­plaints about the New York Re­pub­lic­an in 2012, and it in­cluded him on its most re­cent (bi­par­tis­an) list of the most cor­rupt mem­bers of Con­gress.

If this in­vest­ig­a­tion ac­tu­ally hap­pens, it wouldn’t be the only one Grimm has to worry about. Earli­er this month, the FBI ar­res­ted a former Grimm fun­draiser on charges she il­leg­ally brought in more than $100,000 to his cam­paign. Grimm is also un­der fed­er­al in­vest­ig­a­tion over ac­cus­a­tions that he or his cam­paign il­leg­ally asked for money from for­eign donors.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.