Here’s why the shutdown should be resolved as quickly and comprehensively as possible.
The shutdown costs $300 million a day, $1.6 billion a week.
That’s the amount analyst firm IHS Global Insight estimates the shutdown is costing in terms of lost economic output. According to research firm Macroeconomic Advisers, a two-week shutdown would decrease gross domestic product growth by 0.3 percent. Three weeks would raise that to 0.5 percent. A shutdown lasting the entire month of October would decrease the GDP by 0.7 percent. Moody’s Analytics estimates a higher cost, saying a three- or four-week shutdown will decrease growth by 1.4 percent. Yes, $1.6 billion a week is miniscule compared with the $16 trillion U.S. economy. But it will add up as the shutdown continues.
But that decrease in GDP could be recovered if Congress votes to give furloughed employees back pay.
More than 800,000 workers are furloughed during the shutdown. But if they were to get paid for their time away from work, GDP would rebound. “Following a shutdown, real compensation would simply return to its previous level, temporarily boosting GDP growth by roughly the same amount that the decline in real compensation reduced it,” Macroeconomic Advisers explains. While there is precedent for Congress to give workers back pay after a shutdown, it’s no guarantee.
If the shutdown drags on, it can take consumer confidence down with it.
The longer the shutdown goes on, the more uncertainty arises in the economy (especially as the debt ceiling approaches). Consumer confidence is a tricky thing to predict, but analysts from IHS, Oxford Economics, TD Securities USA, and others are all telling reporters the same thing: A long shutdown could only erode confidence.
If the government back pays its workers, it will be out a lot of cash. The longer the shutdown, the more money it will lose by the time it’s over.
The economy will probably rebound if the government pays its workers for their furloughs — but that’s all wasted money. Essentially, the government will be paying for paid vacations. The Congressional Research Service, citing the Office of Management and Budget, says the 28-day shutdown of 1995-96 cost the government $1.4 billion. And independent research suggests that number should be even higher. In today’s dollars, that would be more than $2 billion.
The shutdown also costs some money itself, figuring in the security needed to close off usually open areas such as memorials and national parks, and strange protocols such as replacing a website with a “We’re closed” notice even though it may be cheaper just to leave the site up and un-updated.
By trying to defund a program, Republicans will be throwing out a lot of government cash.
Opening the government would allow lawmakers to solve the more pressing problem — the debt ceiling.
Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew put in no uncertain terms that the U.S. government could begin defaulting on its debts starting Oct. 17 if the debt ceiling isn’t raised. This threatens the full faith and credit of the country and it would rattle markets, increase interest rates on U.S. Treasury bonds, and upset the notion that the U.S. economy is the most stable in the worldwide economy.
In other word: Congress, get a move on!
What We're Following See More »
Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.
"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."
"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."
Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.
If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."