The United States on Thursday asserted that Syria is slowing the dismantlement of its chemical arsenal by “bargaining” for unneeded security gear.
Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime has demanded “armored jackets for shipping containers, electronic countermeasures and detectors for improvised explosive devices” to help transport its warfare chemicals to a coastal city for removal by foreign ships, said Robert Mikulak, Washington’s ambassador to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in the Hague.
However, such pleas “are without merit,” and could threaten an international effort to eliminate the Syrian government’s chemical-arms stockpile by an end-of-June deadline, the envoy told a gathering of the 41-nation OPCW Executive Council.
“It is essential that the Syrian government establish a plan that will give the international community confidence that movements will be made regularly” to send its warfare chemicals abroad for destruction, he said in prepared remarks to the OPCW governing body. The chemical-weapons watchdog agency is overseeing the disarmament operation, which began in the aftermath of an August nerve-gas strike allegedly responsible for more than 1,400 deaths, including women and children.
Removal of the weapons has proceeded slower than planned. Less than one-twentieth of the stocks had left the country as of Wednesday, leaving international authorities far from their initial goal of wrapping up removal by Feb. 5.
For months, Western nations reportedly have been resisting requests from Syria’s government for chemical-security equipment that it might turn against rebels in the country’s bloody civil war. Mikulak said Syria’s chemical-warfare assets “have often been moved during the ongoing conflict without such equipment, demonstrating that Syria has been able to ensure sufficient protection to date with its current capabilities, and without this additional ‘wish list’ of equipment.”
The U.S. official noted that the disarmament operation’s international overseers now agree that Damascus is adequately equipped to safely transport the chemicals.
Damascus, though, last week said it is committed to sending its chemical stockpile overseas “as soon as possible,” according to OPCW Director General Ahmet Üzümcü.
A senior Assad envoy said Damascus is “making intensive efforts to prepare for, and accelerate, the transportation of chemicals, and that it is currently working on a tentative schedule for completing the transportation of chemicals,” Üzümcü said in a statement to his agency’s governing board. The top OPCW official provided no further details.
Noting a separate concern on Thursday, Mikulak said Assad’s government wants to eliminate several subterranean and above-ground chemical-weapon facilities through methods that fall short of full destruction.
Steps such as “welding doors shut and constructing interior obstacles … are readily reversible within days and clearly do not meet the requirement of ‘physically destroyed’ as provided for by the [Chemical Weapons] Convention,” he said.
He urged the OPCW governing board to “reject Syria’s proposal to ‘inactivate’ its hangar and tunnel [chemical-weapon production facilities], rather than physically destroying them as the CWC requires.”
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."