Drug Costs Are Spiking and It’s Not Clear Why

Pharmacists want Congress to investigate a sharp increase in medicinal costs.

A pharmacist pours Truvada pills back into the bottle at Jack's Pharmacy on November 23, 2010 in San Anselmo, California.
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Clara Ritger
Jan. 31, 2014, 12:05 a.m.

Drug costs are rising, but in the opaque world of health care pri­cing, fig­ur­ing out what’s driv­ing the in­crease has be­come dif­fi­cult — if not im­possible.

Non­ethe­less, phar­macists want Con­gress to try. Vexed by triple- or quad­ruple-di­git per­cent in­creases in drug costs, the Na­tion­al Com­munity Phar­macists As­so­ci­ation is ask­ing law­makers to hold a hear­ing to find out why.

The prob­lem, the group says, is that phar­macists are get­ting gouged. Phar­macists try­ing to get their hands on gen­er­ic drugs such as Pravast­at­in, a drug for pa­tients with high cho­les­ter­ol, or the an­it­bi­ot­ic Doxy­cyc­line faced price spikes up­wards of 1,000 per­cent in 2013, ac­cord­ing to a sur­vey by the group.

Some 77 per­cent of phar­macists sur­veyed by the as­so­ci­ation said in the last six months of 2013 they ex­per­i­enced 26 or more in­stances of a large up­swing in the ac­quis­i­tion price of a gen­er­ic drug.

An ad­di­tion­al 84 per­cent said the price fluc­tu­ations im­peded their abil­ity to provide care and re­main in busi­ness, as some com­munity phar­ma­cies could not fill pre­scrip­tions that would res­ult in losses and some pa­tients de­clined med­ic­a­tion that would have emp­tied their wal­lets.

The find­ings are con­sist­ent with re­ports na­tion­wide that gen­er­ic-drug prices are ex­per­i­en­cing bank-break­ing price in­creases. Health care and phar­ma­ceut­ic­al con­sult­ing firm Pem­broke Con­sult­ing, for in­stance, found that with­in the last year, more than a dozen drugs hit prices 10 times their stand­ard rate. NCPA wants Con­gress to hold a hear­ing to find out what’s driv­ing the price points and wheth­er any­thing can be done by the feds to stop the trend.

But one primary-care doc­tor, Dav­id Belk, says he’s sus­pi­cious that the fault lies with drug com­pan­ies. The San Fran­cisco-based blog­ger has ob­served price jumps in single doses of med­ic­a­tion, where one size dosage of a drug was very ex­pens­ive and the oth­er dosages of that same drug were at a more reas­on­able cost.

Belk took a clip of the Costco web­site after he saw the gen­er­ic drug Irbe­sartan, a med­ic­a­tion for high blood pres­sure, hit nearly $300 for a 90-day sup­ply of the 150 mg tab­let. Yet for the 90-day sup­ply of the 300 mg tab­let, con­sumers paid only $30.

“If you ask the phar­ma­ceut­ic­al com­pany, they’ll say ‘Oh, we had a short­age,’ ” Belk said, “which makes no sense be­cause they were mak­ing oth­er mil­li­grams. By the time the phar­macy has figured out the price spiked, it’s dropped back down again.”

That trend, Belk said, leaves phar­ma­cies hanging out to dry with the ex­tra cost.

“Most doc­tors are pre­scrib­ing on the basis of the last drug rep they went to lunch with,” he said. “I think you would fix a lot of it if every­one had to ad­vert­ise their price.”

While Belk pro­poses to turn pa­tients in­to edu­cated con­sumers by cre­at­ing trans­par­ency about pre­scrip­tion drug costs at the doc­tor’s of­fice, the prob­lem re­mains that phar­macists can’t place their fin­ger on why gen­er­ic drugs seem to cost more than they used to—or at least, ex­per­i­ence ex­treme price vari­ations throughout the year.

Dan Mendel­son, CEO of con­sult­ing firm Avalere Health, cred­its the ef­fect­ive­ness and pop­ular­ity of gen­er­ic drugs as one reas­on phar­ma­ceut­ic­al com­pan­ies are able to charge more.

“I think that as de­mand for gen­er­ic drugs has gone up, it’s not sur­pris­ing to see that price has gone up as well,” Mendel­son said. “This is an un­reg­u­lated mar­ket in the sense that no one is telling them what to charge. You’re go­ing to see them cozy up to the price of the brand name product for com­pet­i­tion reas­ons.”

Mendel­son said his prob­lem with get­ting Con­gress in­volved in the situ­ation is that it sug­gests they should step in­to the mar­ket and im­pose price con­trols. Some­times, he said, the spikes are eas­ily ex­plained, such as when Doxy­cyc­line ex­per­i­enced a man­u­fac­tur­ing prob­lem and had a tem­por­ary short­age.

“I think people will con­tin­ue to use these gen­er­ic products be­cause they’re cost ef­fect­ive and needed when pre­scribed,” Mendel­son said. “There’s no ques­tion in my mind de­mand is go­ing to go up be­cause of the Af­ford­able Care Act, and these mar­kets re­spond to de­mand.”

Even high­er prices for gen­er­ics could be on the ho­ri­zon, as all health plans offered on the Af­ford­able Care Act ex­changes must cov­er pre­scrip­tion drugs, which could in­crease use and de­mand among con­sumers.

The Af­ford­able Care Act, however, doesn’t in­clude any spe­cif­ic pro­vi­sions to re­duce the over­all cost of drugs. But gen­er­ics are still cheap­er than their brand-name coun­ter­parts. And with more pat­ents for block­buster drugs set to ex­pire by 2018, they’ll con­tin­ue to be a com­pet­it­ive op­tion on the mar­ket.

What We're Following See More »
McCabe Authorized Criminal Probe Of Sessions One Year Before Firing
1 hours ago

"Nearly a year before Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired senior FBI official Andrew McCabe for what Sessions called a 'lack of candor,'" McCabe launched a federal criminal investigation into whether Sessions withheld information from Congress regarding his contact with Russian operatives. "Democratic lawmakers have repeatedly accused Sessions of misleading them" during his testimony, "and called on federal authorities to investigate." When Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation, "several top Republican and Democratic lawmakers were informed of the probe during a closed-door briefing with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and McCabe."

Senate Passes Bill Combating Sex Trafficking Online
1 hours ago

The Senate passed the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act, or SESTA, by a vote of 97-2. The bill now heads to the White House, where President Trump is expected to sign it into law. SESTA lifts federal immunity for internet platforms involved in sex trafficking, "a move that prosecutors, victims and anti-trafficking activists are heralding as an essential step in cracking down on the crime." Opponents of SESTA argue had argued that lifting the immunity could open websites up to lawsuits based on user-generated content, which could lead to a crackdown on free speech.

How Trade Associations Come Down on the Tariffs
2 hours ago

The Economist

Mark Zuckerberg Responds To Cambridge Analytica Scandal
2 hours ago

In a lengthy Facebook post, Mark Zuckerberg responded to reports that Cambridge Analytica had accessed the personal data of 50 million users, and kept the data after being told by the social media company to delete it. "I started Facebook," wrote Zuckerberg, "and at the end of the day I'm responsible for what happens on our platform ... While this specific issue involving Cambridge Analytica should no longer happen with new apps today, that doesn't change what happened in the past." On Monday, Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, called for “Mr. Zuckerberg and other CEOs” to testify "about social media manipulation in the 2016 election."

White House Backs Omnibus Spending Bill
3 hours ago

"The White House is backing a $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill despite opposition from some House conservatives ... 'The President and the leaders discussed their support for the bill, which includes more funds to rebuild the military, such as the largest pay raise for our troops in a decade, more than 100 miles of new construction for the border wall and other key domestic priorities, like combatting the opioid crisis and rebuilding our nation’s infrastructure,' White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement." The details of the bill are expected to be released later today.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.