California’s Clout in Congress Is in Dramatic Decline

The state is losing chairmanships, expertise, and legislative skill — all things crucial to maintaining leverage in Congress.

Rep. Henry Waxman in his Rayburn Building office. 
National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
Jan. 30, 2014, 1:22 p.m.

It wasn’t so long ago that Cali­for­nia’s con­gres­sion­al del­eg­a­tion prowled the halls of Con­gress as not just the biggest, but the most mus­cu­lar, most seni­or, and most power­ful on Cap­it­ol Hill. Those days are in­creas­ingly in the rear­view mir­ror.

Rep. Henry Wax­man’s an­nounce­ment that he was call­ing it quits after four dec­ades capped a series of de­par­tures that prom­ises to leave the once-vaunted del­eg­a­tion de­pleted and di­min­ished head­ing in­to the next Con­gress.

Cali­for­nia will have lost a com­bined total of more than 400 years of con­gres­sion­al ex­per­i­ence between the 2012 and 2014 elec­tions — an enorm­ous sum in an in­sti­tu­tion where seni­or­ity is king and power is of­ten still ac­cu­mu­lated by the dec­ade.

“It’s a big hit for Cali­for­nia,” said Rep. Linda Sanc­hez, D-Cal­if. “It’s a chan­ging of the guard.”

It’s not just the years walk­ing out the door but the politi­cians them­selves. Wax­man has been one of the Demo­crat­ic Party’s lead­ing le­gis­lat­ors for a gen­er­a­tion. Re­tir­ing Rep. Buck McK­eon is the in­flu­en­tial Re­pub­lic­an chair­man of the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee. And Rep. George Miller, one of House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi’s closest con­fid­antes and a main­stay of shap­ing the na­tion’s edu­ca­tion policies, is headed for the exit after 40 years.

That bi­par­tis­an trio — all of whom an­nounced their re­tire­ments this month — leaves be­hind a com­bined cen­tury of ser­vice in the House.

“We’re los­ing seni­or­ity. We’re los­ing ex­pert­ise. We’re los­ing le­gis­lat­ive skills,” said Bill Car­rick, a long­time Cali­for­nia polit­ic­al strategist, who also worked in Wash­ing­ton D.C. for Sen. Ed­ward Kennedy. “It’s a tough thing to re­place.”

And one of the biggest shoes could still be yet to drop. The back-to-back de­par­tures of Wax­man and Miller, two top Pelosi lieu­ten­ants, have again stirred spec­u­la­tion that the San Fran­cisco Demo­crat could be next. Pelosi has re­peatedly said she’s stay­ing put, and has star­ted the pa­per­work to run again.

But the Cali­for­nia ex­odus began in the 2012 cycle when a spate of re­tire­ments, elect­or­al de­feats, and new dis­trict bound­ar­ies decim­ated the del­eg­a­tion. The fresh­man class of 2014 in­cluded a re­mark­able 14 Cali­for­ni­ans.

They re­placed in­flu­en­tial law­makers such as Reps. Howard Ber­man, a past Demo­crat­ic lead­er of the For­eign Af­fairs Com­mit­tee; Dav­id Dreier, the Rules Com­mit­tee chair­man; Jerry Lewis, a former Ap­pro­pri­ations chair­man; and Dan Lun­gren, who was “may­or” of the Cap­it­ol as chair­man of the Ad­min­is­tra­tion pan­el.

“It does im­pact Cali­for­nia and our abil­ity to in­flu­ence and get what we need,” said Sanc­hez, though she praised the fresh en­ergy of the “new blood.”

Cali­for­nia still has the biggest squad­ron of law­makers on Cap­it­ol Hill. The 38 Demo­crats who com­prise the state’s 53-mem­ber del­eg­a­tion are great­er in num­ber than any oth­er single state’s en­tire House co­hort. But what Cali­for­nia has in size, it lacks in unity. The no­tori­ously frac­tious del­eg­a­tion is barely on speak­ing terms.

Even as a his­tor­ic drought has left the state parched for wa­ter, Sanc­hez couldn’t re­mem­ber the last time Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans all gathered in the same room to strategize about Cali­for­nia’s com­mon needs. “That’s a good ques­tion,” she said. “I’m not sure.”

“We have a very large del­eg­a­tion, and if there were more co­oper­a­tion Cali­for­nia would be bet­ter po­si­tioned to tackle the prob­lems of the state,” Sanc­hez said.

Rep. Zoe Lof­gren, who chairs the Cali­for­nia Demo­crat­ic del­eg­a­tion, which meets weekly, said she’s “got to the point” where she’s tired of “try­ing to ex­plain why we didn’t meet” as a bi­par­tis­an group. Re­la­tions are so bad that Lof­gren was point­ing to a re­cent bi­par­tis­an gath­er­ing over glasses of wine, or­gan­ized by Cali­for­nia fresh­men, as a pos­it­ive “first step.”

“Three Re­pub­lic­ans showed up,” she said, with a wisp of hope.

Cali­for­nia is not without key posts in Con­gress. The state still has two of the most seni­or U.S. sen­at­ors, Di­anne Fein­stein and Bar­bara Box­er. There’s Pelosi and Rep. Xavi­er Be­cerra in the House Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship. Rep. Kev­in Mc­Carthy is the ma­jor­ity whip. GOP Rep. Dar­rell Issa is the Over­sight chair­man. Rep. Max­ine Wa­ters is the rank­ing Demo­crat on Fin­an­cial Ser­vices. Sanc­hez is the top Demo­crat on Eth­ics. And law­makers from the state hold sway on nu­mer­ous sub­com­mit­tees.

But Cali­for­nia mem­bers already held most of those po­s­i­tions in ad­di­tion to the va­cated slots of the de­par­ted and de­part­ing mem­bers.

Car­rick said the ef­fects of the de­par­tures could be par­tic­u­larly acute be­cause of the con­gres­sion­al polit­ics of state del­eg­a­tions. “Even though we have a lot of mem­bers of Con­gress, we en­gender a lot of jeal­ousy,” he said, “… be­cause people in smal­ler and me­di­um states — they take the at­ti­tude that we can’t give Cali­for­nia everything.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×