Republican lawmakers are asserting that President Obama took too long to inform U.S. allies of a possible Russian treaty violation.
The Obama administration notified other NATO nations earlier this month of the potential breach involving Russian cruise-missile tests that began as long ago as 2008. The U.S. State Department on Thursday confirmed it had expressed concern to Moscow about the possible violation, the New York Times reported.
In a Thursday letter to Obama, Representative Mike Turner (R-Ohio) said details on the potential breach of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty should have been available to NATO nations as they crafted a 2012 nuclear-strategy review.
“Your administration called upon NATO to undertake the 2012 Deterrence and Defense Posture Review (DDPR) in an effort to analyze the current threat environment and ensure that the alliance’s nuclear posture is designed to meet those threats,” Turner’s letter states.
The U.S. “failure to disclose this critical information to NATO during the review process both compromises the DDPR and weakens the trust our allies place in us,” the lawmaker added.
The same concern comes up in a Thursday joint statement by Turner and three other GOP lawmakers: House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), Vice Chairman Mac Thornberry (R-Texas), and Strategic Forces Subcommittee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Ala.).
“Intermediate-range missiles threaten our European partners most of all,” the release says. “Why were they kept in the dark for four years according to this [Times] report? Why did the Obama administration keep evidence of Russia’s cheating from our allies when NATO was recently debating and deciding upon its nuclear posture?”
To date, Washington has not formally accused Moscow of violating the 1987 pact.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.