Lawmakers: Obama Kept NATO in Dark on Possible Russian Arms Breach

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
Jan. 31, 2014, 6:52 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­an law­makers are as­sert­ing that Pres­id­ent Obama took too long to in­form U.S. al­lies of a pos­sible Rus­si­an treaty vi­ol­a­tion.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion no­ti­fied oth­er NATO na­tions earli­er this month of the po­ten­tial breach in­volving Rus­si­an cruise-mis­sile tests that began as long ago as 2008. The U.S. State De­part­ment on Thursday con­firmed it had ex­pressed con­cern to Mo­scow about the pos­sible vi­ol­a­tion, the New York Times re­por­ted.

In a Thursday let­ter to Obama, Rep­res­ent­at­ive Mike Turn­er (R-Ohio) said de­tails on the po­ten­tial breach of the 1987 In­ter­me­di­ate-Range Nuc­le­ar Forces Treaty should have been avail­able to NATO na­tions as they craf­ted a 2012 nuc­le­ar-strategy re­view.

“Your ad­min­is­tra­tion called upon NATO to un­der­take the 2012 De­terrence and De­fense Pos­ture Re­view (DDPR) in an ef­fort to ana­lyze the cur­rent threat en­vir­on­ment and en­sure that the al­li­ance’s nuc­le­ar pos­ture is de­signed to meet those threats,” Turn­er’s let­ter states.

The U.S. “fail­ure to dis­close this crit­ic­al in­form­a­tion to NATO dur­ing the re­view pro­cess both com­prom­ises the DDPR and weak­ens the trust our al­lies place in us,” the law­maker ad­ded.

The same con­cern comes up in a Thursday joint state­ment by Turn­er and three oth­er GOP law­makers: House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Buck McK­eon (R-Cal­if.), Vice Chair­man Mac Thorn­berry (R-Texas), and Stra­tegic Forces Sub­com­mit­tee Chair­man Mike Ro­gers (R-Ala.).

“In­ter­me­di­ate-range mis­siles threaten our European part­ners most of all,” the re­lease says. “Why were they kept in the dark for four years ac­cord­ing to this [Times] re­port? Why did the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion keep evid­ence of Rus­sia’s cheat­ing from our al­lies when NATO was re­cently de­bat­ing and de­cid­ing upon its nuc­le­ar pos­ture?” 

To date, Wash­ing­ton has not form­ally ac­cused Mo­scow of vi­ol­at­ing the 1987 pact.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP’S ATTORNEY WAS SET TO TESTIFY ON WEDNESDAY
Senate Intel Postpones Testimony by Cohen
2 days ago
THE LATEST
AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED CONSIDERATION
Senate Rejects Effort to Nix SALT Tax Changes
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Senate Democrats on Thursday failed in their first attempt to save the state and local tax deduction, which helps many residents of California and other high-cost states reduce their federal income tax bills. The Republican-controlled Senate voted 52-47 to reject an amendment that would have prevented the Senate from considering any bill that repeals or limits the deduction as part of a planned tax overhaul."

Source:
INTERVIEWED BY COMMITTEE STAFF
Lewandowski Meets with Senate Intelligence Committee
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski appeared on Capitol Hill for a closed-door interview with the Senate intelligence committee Wednesday, according to a source familiar with the matter. Lewandowski is the latest senior official in Trump's orbit who has met with the committee as part of its investigation into Russian election meddling and possible collusion with the Trump campaign."

Source:
FISHING EXPEDITION
Some Members Seek to Wrap Up Russia Investigations by Year’s End
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"A growing number of key Republicans are sending this message to the leaders of the congressional committees investigating potential Trump campaign collusion with the Russians: Wrap it up soon. In the House and Senate, several Republicans who sit on key committees are starting to grumble that the investigations have spanned the better part of the past nine months, contending that the Democratic push to extend the investigation well into next year could amount to a fishing expedition."

Source:
WROTE LAW THAT WEAKENED OPIOID OVERSIGHT
Trump: Marino Withdrawing Nomination for Drug Czar
5 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login