U.S. Signals Nonproliferation to Be Priority in South Korea Atomic Talks

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
Jan. 31, 2014, 7:58 a.m.

Seni­or U.S. of­fi­cials are sig­nal­ing that non­pro­lif­er­a­tion con­cerns will be pri­or­it­ized over eco­nom­ic is­sues in talks with South Korea for a new atom­ic trade deal.

South Korea and the United States are in the middle of ne­go­ti­at­ing a re­place­ment ac­cord for their 1974 bi­lat­er­al nuc­le­ar co­oper­a­tion agree­ment that — after be­ing re­newed for two years this week by Con­gress, is set to ex­pire in 2016. The thorn­i­est is­sue in the trade talks is wheth­er South Korea will be per­mit­ted ac­cess to sens­it­ive re­pro­cessing and urani­um en­rich­ment tech­no­lo­gies, which can be used both to pro­duce new re­act­or fuel and war­head-suit­able ma­ter­i­als, the Yon­hap News Agency re­por­ted.

Thomas Coun­try­man, as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of State for in­ter­na­tion­al se­cur­ity and non­pro­lif­er­a­tion, test­i­fied at a Thursday Sen­ate com­mit­tee hear­ing that in trade talks with South Korea, “we con­tin­ue to fo­cus not on the polit­ic­al, not on the eco­nom­ic but on a con­sist­ent non­pro­lif­er­a­tion policy, what best strengthens the glob­al non­pro­lif­er­a­tion re­gime.

“That re­mains our con­sist­ent guid­ing star,” said Coun­try­man, who is head­ing up the U.S. side of talks with Seoul.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is con­cerned that al­low­ing South Korea ac­cess to nuc­le­ar weapon-rel­ev­ant tech­no­lo­gies will un­der­mine its non­pro­lif­er­a­tion po­s­i­tion in bi­lat­er­al atom­ic trade talks with oth­er na­tions. A nuc­le­ar ac­cord fi­nal­ized with Vi­et­nam last year did not in­clude an iron­clad prom­ise from Hanoi to nev­er pur­sue en­rich­ment or re­pro­cessing cap­ab­il­it­ies.

The U.S. State and En­ergy De­part­ments have ad­op­ted a “flex­ible” policy on wheth­er to make oth­er coun­tries in any new bi­lat­er­al nuc­le­ar trade deals prom­ise to for­sake weapon-rel­ev­ant tech­no­lo­gies.

Deputy En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Daniel Pone­man told the Sen­ate Hear­ing that “we have al­ways sought to min­im­ize en­rich­ment and re­pro­cessing” in trade ne­go­ti­ations.

Coun­try­man said the Vi­et­nam deal would not serve as a tem­plate in ne­go­ti­ations with Seoul.

“I don’t quite agree that the Vi­et­nam agree­ment has a pre­ced­en­tial value for the R.O.K. agree­ment,” Coun­try­man said. “We’re already far along in our dis­cus­sions and on kind of a dif­fer­ent plane of dis­cus­sion.”

The next round of nuc­le­ar trade talks between the two long­time al­lies is slated for April.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Addresses Threats On Jewish Community Centers
1 hours ago
Trump Set To Issue New Travel Ban
2 hours ago

Donald Trump is set to issue a new and more focused executive order clarifying the scope of his travel ban, hoping that the order will survive legal challenges. The new order would focus on the same seven countries, "but would only bar entry to those without a visa and who have never entered the United States before. Unlike the original order, people from those countries who already have permanent U.S. residency (green cards) or visas would not face any restrictions." Some lawyers believe the government will now have much stronger standing, though lawyers who challenged the initial order see the same core problems with the forthcoming ban.

Trump Taps Lt. Gen. McMaster as NSC Head
2 hours ago

"President Donald Trump announced Monday that Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster will serve as his next national security adviser, filling the void left last week by the sudden dismissal of Michael Flynn. ... Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, who had been serving as the acting national security adviser since Flynn's exit, will return to his role as chief of staff of the National Security Council." The pick was widely praised on both sides of the aisle.

Pruitt Confirmed As EPA Head
3 days ago
Harward Turns Down NSC Job
4 days ago

"Ret. Vice Adm. Bob Harward turned down President Donald Trump's offer to be national security adviser Thursday, depriving the administration of a top candidate for a critical foreign policy post days after Trump fired Michael Flynn." Among the potential reasons: his family, his lack of assurances that he could build his own team, and that "the White House seems so chaotic."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.