Former Ally: Chris Christie Knew About Bridgegate ‘When the Lanes Were Closed’

If the allegations prove true, the governor’s pleas of ignorance may now come back to hurt him.

EAST RUTHERFORD, NJ - JANUARY 29: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie speaks at a press conference announcing new objectives to crack down on human and sex trafficking throughout the state of New Jersey, inspired in part by the upcoming Super Bowl, on January 29, 2014 in East Rutherford, New Jersey. Christie Spoke along side New Jersey Attorney General John Hoffman and Cindy McCain, wife of Arizona Senator John McCain. The Super Bowl will be played at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, NJ, this Sunday, February 2, 2014. (Photo by Andrew Burton/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sarah Mimms, Marina Koren and Brian Resnick
Add to Briefcase
Sarah Mimms and Marina Koren Brian Resnick
Jan. 31, 2014, 11:02 a.m.

When Dav­id Wild­stein, a Chris Christie-ap­poin­ted of­fi­cial at the Port Au­thor­ity, pleaded the Fifth dur­ing a hear­ing about the bridge-clos­ure scan­dal earli­er this month, spec­u­la­tion aboun­ded that he had something to hide. Now, ac­cord­ing to a let­ter from his law­yer, it looks like he did.

The let­ter, ob­tained by The New York Times, sug­gests that the or­der to close the bridge was “the Christie ad­min­is­tra­tion’s or­der” and that “evid­ence ex­ists as well ty­ing Mr. Christie to hav­ing know­ledge of the lane clos­ures, dur­ing the peri­od when the lanes were closed, con­trary to what the gov­ernor stated pub­licly in a two-hour press con­fer­ence.”

In the let­ter, pub­lished by The Wall Street Journ­al on Fri­day, Wild­stein’s lay­wer writes that his cli­ent “con­tests the ac­cur­acy of vari­ous state­ments that the gov­ernor made about him and he can prove the in­ac­cur­acy of some.”

Christie re­spon­ded to the let­ter in a state­ment late Fri­day af­ter­noon.

“Mr. Wild­stein’s law­yer con­firms what the Gov­ernor has said all along — he had ab­so­lutely no pri­or know­ledge of the lane clos­ures be­fore they happened and whatever Mr. Wild­stein’s mo­tiv­a­tions were for clos­ing them to be­gin with,” the state­ment read

Dur­ing his mara­thon press con­fer­ence on Jan. 9, Gov. Chris Christie said he was “em­bar­rassed and hu­mi­li­ated” by the lane clos­ures, and in­sisted that he only learned of his of­fice’s in­volve­ment the same day the pub­lic did, through leaked email cor­res­pond­ence, just the day be­fore. “I was blind­sided,” he told the re­port­ers.

At a Jan. 9 hear­ing be­fore the New Jer­sey Le­gis­lature about the scan­dal, Wild­stein re­fused to an­swer ques­tions, cit­ing his right to re­main si­lent un­der the Fifth Amend­ment, which promp­ted the Le­gis­lature to hold him in con­tempt.

But the point of this let­ter was not to ex­plain Wild­stein’s earli­er si­lence, or even to take a stab at Christie’s deni­als. Wild­stein’s law­yer wrote the let­ter to con­test the Port Au­thor­ity’s de­cision to not cov­er Wild­stein’s leg­al fees as the in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the bridge clos­ure con­tin­ues.

In Au­gust, the gov­ernor’s deputy chief of staff sent Wild­stein a note that read, “Time for some traffic prob­lems in Fort Lee.” Wild­stein wrote back, “Got it.”

Wild­stein resigned from the po­s­i­tion of dir­ect­or of In­ter­state Cap­it­al Pro­jects at the Port Au­thor­ity in Decem­ber amid grow­ing con­tro­versy about the lane clos­ures. “My plan was to leave the agency at some point next year, but the Fort Lee is­sue has been a dis­trac­tion, and I think it’s bet­ter to move on earli­er,” he said at the time.

Shawn Boburg, the Re­cord re­port­er who broke the ori­gin­al story, told CNN that Wild­stein was a long­time Christie con­fid­ant, the “eyes and ears in­side this massive agency.” Christie’s ver­sion of his re­la­tion­ship with Wild­stein is any­thing but. “Dav­id and I were not friends in high school,” he said Thursday. “I was the class pres­id­ent and ath­lete. I don’t know what Dav­id was do­ing dur­ing that peri­od of time.”

What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
6 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
9 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
11 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Clinton Reaching Out to GOP Senators
14 hours ago

If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."

Trump Admits He’s Behind
14 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.