White House to Keystone Advocates: Not So Fast

The administration’s response to a key State Department finding on the pipeline left Obama plenty of room to keep the project on ice.

President Obama speaks at a pipeyard for the southern leg of the Keystone XL Pipeline.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
Jan. 31, 2014, 6:35 p.m.

Key­stone XL pipeline ad­voc­ates were quick to say that Fri­day’s State De­part­ment re­port gives Pres­id­ent Obama all the evid­ence he needs to ap­prove the pro­ject.

They’ll be dis­ap­poin­ted after hear­ing from the White House. On Fri­day night the White House left it­self plenty of breath­ing room on mak­ing the fi­nal de­cision.

“The Pres­id­ent has clearly stated that the pro­ject will be in the na­tion­al in­terest only if it does not sig­ni­fic­antly ex­acer­bate the prob­lem of car­bon pol­lu­tion. The Fi­nal Sup­ple­ment­al En­vir­on­ment­al Im­pact State­ment in­cludes a range of es­tim­ates of the pro­ject’s cli­mate im­pacts, and that in­form­a­tion will now need to be closely eval­u­ated by Sec­ret­ary [of State John] Kerry and oth­er rel­ev­ant agency heads in the weeks ahead,” said Matt Lehrich, a White House spokes­man.

“A de­cision on wheth­er the pro­ject is in the na­tion­al in­terest will be made only after care­ful con­sid­er­a­tion of the SEIS and oth­er per­tin­ent in­form­a­tion, com­ments from the pub­lic, and views of oth­er agency heads,” Lehrich ad­ded.

The key find­ing in the long-awaited State De­part­ment study is that Key­stone would likely have little ef­fect on the rate of ex­pan­sion of car­bon-in­tens­ive oil sands pro­jects.

That ma­jor find­ing is a boost for Tran­sCanada’s pro­posed pipeline and a blow to en­vir­on­ment­al­ists, who say build­ing Key­stone XL would drive up emis­sions by serving as a cata­lyst for ex­pan­ded oil sands pro­duc­tion.

But the re­port — avail­able here — also ex­am­ines al­tern­at­ive oil price and pipeline-con­straint scen­ari­os that dampen oil sands pro­duc­tion, giv­ing pro­ject op­pon­ents something to hang their hat on.

What We're Following See More »
$618 BILLION IN FUNDING
By a Big Margin, House Passes Defense Bill
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The National Defense Authorization Act passed the House this morning by a 375-34 vote. The bill, which heads to the Senate next week for final consideration, would fund the military to the tune of $618.7 billion, "about $3.2 billion more than the president requested for fiscal 2017. ... The White House has issued a veto threat on both the House and Senate-passed versions of the bill, but has not yet said if it will sign the compromise bill released by the conference committee this week."

Source:
SUCCEEDS UPTON
Walden to Chair Energy and Commerce Committee
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Republicans have elected Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) the next chairman of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee. Walden defeated Reps. John Shimkus (R-IL) and Joe Barton (R-TX), the former committee chairman, in the race for the gavel" to succeed Michgan's Fred Upton.

Source:
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT
Senators Looking to Limit Deportations Under Trump
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Democratic and Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are working on legislation that would limit deportations" under President-elect Donald Trump. Leading the effort are Judiciary Committee members Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) is also expected to sign on.

Source:
REQUIRES CHANGE IN LAW
Trump Taps Mattis for Defense Secretary
2 days ago
BREAKING

Donald Trump has selected retired Marine Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis as his secretary of defense, according to The Washington Post. Mattis retired from active duty just four years ago, so Congress will have "to pass new legislation to bypass a federal law that states secretaries of defense must not have been on active duty in the previous seven years." The official announcement is likely to come next week.

Source:
MEASURE HEADED TO OBAMA
Senate OKs 10-Year Extension of Iran Sanctions
2 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login