NATO, Russian Rhetoric Heats Up Over Missile Defense Moves

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
Feb. 3, 2014, 6:58 a.m.

The head of NATO on Sat­urday faul­ted Rus­sia for its com­bat­ive rhet­or­ic and threats of new mil­it­ary de­ploy­ments in re­sponse to the al­li­ance’s mis­sile shield.

“We must re­frain from threats against each oth­er,” NATO Sec­ret­ary Gen­er­al An­ders Fogh Rasmussen was quoted by Stars and Stripes as say­ing at the Mu­nich Se­cur­ity Con­fer­ence. “The de­ploy­ment of new of­fens­ive weapons has no place in a true stra­tegic part­ner­ship.”

Rasmussen re­buked Rus­sia for its re­cent field­ing of bal­list­ic mis­siles in its west­ern ter­rit­ory.

Late last year, the Rus­si­an mil­it­ary said it had fielded nuc­le­ar-cap­able Iskander mis­siles in the West­ern Mil­it­ary Dis­trict — an area that in­cludes the Ka­lin­in­grad, a Rus­si­an ex­clave that bor­ders NATO states Po­land and Lithuania. Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin shortly af­ter­ward said Iskander mis­siles were not be­ing fielded in the Ka­lin­in­grad, though he left the door open on their pos­sible fu­ture de­ploy­ment if no res­ol­u­tion is reached with NATO over its mis­sile de­fense am­bi­tions.

The com­mand­er of the West­ern Mil­it­ary Dis­trict last month an­nounced his dis­trict would be re­ceiv­ing a bri­gade of Iskander M bal­list­ic mis­siles later in the year, though he did not spe­cify ex­actly where they would be fielded, Voice of Rus­sia re­por­ted.

Mo­scow sees NATO’s evolving mis­sile shield as a threat to nuc­le­ar sta­bil­ity on the con­tin­ent. The Krem­lin re­peatedly has de­man­ded a bind­ing pledge from the al­li­ance that U.S. in­ter­cept­ors planned for field­ing in Ro­mania and Po­land in the com­ing years will nev­er be aimed at Rus­si­an stra­tegic as­sets. Wash­ing­ton and NATO have re­spon­ded with polit­ic­al as­sur­ances that the mis­sile-de­fense sys­tem is fo­cused on pro­tect­ing against a pos­sible at­tack from the Middle East.

Rus­si­an For­eign Min­is­ter Sergei Lav­rov dis­coun­ted these as­sur­ances in re­marks at the Mu­nich for­um.

“The mil­it­ary people real­ize mis­sile de­fense is part of the stra­tegic ar­sen­al of the United States,” Lav­rov was quoted by Stars and Stripes as say­ing. “When a nuc­le­ar shield is ad­ded to a nuc­le­ar sword, it is very tempt­ing to use this of­fens­ive, de­fense cap­ab­il­ity.”

The U.S. de­ploy­ment last week of a war­ship to its new home port in Rota, Spain, as an ele­ment of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s “phased ad­apt­ive ap­proach” for European mis­sile de­fense ap­pears to be spark­ing fresh Rus­si­an con­cerns.

The head of the Rus­si­an For­eign Min­istry’s se­cur­ity and dis­arm­a­ment de­part­ment, Mikhail Uly­an­ov, on Sat­urday told In­ter­fax that so long as the United States ex­pands its mis­sile de­fense cap­ab­il­it­ies, there can be no new arms con­trol talks with Rus­sia, IT­AR-Tass re­por­ted.

He faul­ted the United States and NATO for con­tinu­ing to de­vel­op their mis­sile shield des­pite re­cent pro­gress with Ir­an in ne­go­ti­at­ing an in­ter­na­tion­al agree­ment that would tem­por­ar­ily ar­rest some of its nuc­le­ar weapon-ap­plic­able activ­it­ies.

If U.S. an­ti­mis­sile de­ploy­ments in Europe are not hal­ted, then Rus­sia may choose to with­draw from the New START ac­cord, Voice of Rus­sia quoted the seni­or dis­arm­a­ment of­fi­cial as say­ing.

“We are con­cerned that the U.S. is con­tinu­ing to build up mis­sile de­fense cap­ab­il­ity without con­sid­er­ing the in­terests and con­cerns of Rus­sia,” Uly­an­ov said. “Such a policy can un­der­mine stra­tegic sta­bil­ity and lead to a situ­ation where Rus­sia will be forced to ex­er­cise [its] right of with­draw­al from the [New START] treaty.”

Amid the post-Cold War pos­tur­ing about mis­sile de­fense, there are grow­ing re­ports that Rus­sia may be in vi­ol­a­tion of the 1987 In­ter­me­di­ate-Range Nuc­le­ar Forces Treaty. U.S. of­fi­cials last week up­dated NATO equi­val­ents about the re­puted ground-launched cruise mis­sile, whose al­leged on­go­ing test­ing could con­sti­tute a breach of the arms con­trol treaty, the Chris­ti­an Sci­ence Mon­it­or re­por­ted.

The ac­cord bars both Rus­sia and the United States from de­vel­op­ing, test­ing or stock­pil­ing bal­list­ic and cruise mis­siles with ranges between 300 and 3,400 miles. While the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has con­firmed rais­ing its con­cerns over mis­sile test­ing with Rus­sia, it has not said ex­actly which weapon could be in breach of the ban on in­ter­me­di­ate-range arms.

The weapon, ac­cord­ing to some re­ports, could be the R-500 Iskander K — a hy­per­son­ic cruise mis­sile.

An­drei Klimov, deputy chair­man of the Rus­si­an State Duma in­ter­na­tion­al af­fairs com­mit­tee, cri­ti­cized the United States for rais­ing treaty con­cerns at a time when “there are plenty of in­ter­na­tion­al is­sues that need our at­ten­tion, such as Syr­ia.”

“I see no good reas­on for the Amer­ic­ans to raise this now,” he said.

Vladi­mir Dvork­ing, an arms con­trol ana­lyst with a state-af­fil­i­ated think tank in Mo­scow, told the Mon­it­or it was too early to be­gin de­bat­ing wheth­er Rus­sia is in vi­ol­a­tion of the in­ter­me­di­ate-range forces ac­cord.

“This might have something to do with all the tests go­ing on in Rus­sia’s mis­sile com­plex,” Dvork­ing said. “But there is no fi­nal pic­ture of how these new mis­siles will look, or how they will be used once they are de­ployed.”

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER GOP MODERATE TO HER SIDE
John Warner to Endorse Clinton
11 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will score another high-powered Republican endorsement on Wednesday, according to a campaign aide: retired senator John Warner of Virginia, a popular GOP maverick with renowned military credentials."

Source:
AUTHORITY OF EPA IN QUESTION
Appeals Court Hears Clean Power Plant Case
19 minutes ago
THE LATEST

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday "heard several hours of oral arguments" over the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan rules. The 10-judge panel "focused much of their questioning on whether the EPA had overstepped its legal authority by seeking to broadly compel this shift away from coal, a move the EPA calls the Best System of Emission Reduction, or BSER. The states and companies suing the EPA argue the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate anything outside of a power plant itself."

Source:
$28 MILLION THIS WEEK
Here Come the Ad Buys
31 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"Spending by super PACs tied to Donald Trump friends such as Ben Carson and banker Andy Beal will help make this week the general election's most expensive yet. Republicans and Democrats will spend almost $28 million on radio and television this week, according to advertising records, as Trump substantially increases his advertising buy for the final stretch. He's spending $6.4 million in nine states, part of what aides have said will be a $100 million television campaign through Election Day."

Source:
UNLIKELY TO GET A VOTE, LIKELY TO ANGER GOP SENATORS
Obama Nominates Ambassador to Cuba
4 hours ago
THE LATEST
GOP REFUSED VOTE ON FCC COMMISIONER
Reid Blocks Tech Bill Over “Broken Promise”
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.

Source:
×