Internet Giants, Amid Grumbling, Release New Data on Government Spying

Google, Microsoft, and other companies are thrilled to be able to tell their customers more about the government’s surveillance orders — but are still seeking more transparency.

A sign is posted on the exterior of Google headquarters on January 30, 2014 in Mountain View, California.  
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Feb. 3, 2014, 10:50 a.m.

Sev­er­al in­ter­net be­hemoths re­leased up­dated data Monday de­tail­ing in broad terms the amount of na­tion­al se­cur­ity re­quests for user data they have re­ceived from the gov­ern­ment, part of trans­par­ency re­ports re­cently per­mit­ted by the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

The re­ports — from Google, Mi­crosoft, Face­book, Linked­In, and Ya­hoo — provide in­form­a­tion on the num­ber of gov­ern­ment re­quests for user data, the amount of users af­fected by those re­quests, and the per­cent­age of re­quests that yiel­ded a re­sponse. Their dis­clos­ures join a sim­il­ar one pub­lished last week by Apple.

But the data, de­tail­ing an ag­greg­ate sweep of six-month in­ter­vals, is only al­lowed to be lis­ted in “bands of 1,000,” per gov­ern­ment in­struc­tions. For ex­ample, in de­tail­ing its most re­cent re­port cov­er­ing Janu­ary to June 2013, Mi­crosoft ex­plains that it re­ceived few­er than 1,000 or­ders “seek­ing dis­clos­ure of cus­tom­er con­tent” and that those or­ders “re­lated to between 15,000 and 15,999” ac­counts.

In dis­clos­ing the re­cords de­tail­ing gov­ern­ment-data re­quests, the tech gi­ants opined that they need to dis­close more spe­cif­ic data in or­der to fully calm the rising tide of pri­vacy and civil-liberty con­cerns users have ex­pressed in the wake of the Ed­ward Snowden leaks.

“Pub­lish­ing these num­bers is a step in the right dir­ec­tion, and speaks to the prin­ciples for re­form that we an­nounced with oth­er com­pan­ies last Decem­ber,” Google said in a blog post. “But we still be­lieve more trans­par­ency is needed so every­one can bet­ter un­der­stand how sur­veil­lance laws work and de­cide wheth­er or not they serve the pub­lic in­terest.”

Google called on Con­gress to ad­opt stronger trans­par­ency meas­ures and said it wants to be able to dis­close “pre­cise num­bers and types of re­quests we re­ceive, as well as the num­ber of users they af­fect in a timely way.”

Mi­crosoft’s Brad Smith, ex­ec­ut­ive vice pres­id­ent of leg­al and cor­por­ate af­fairs, was even harsh­er in his blog post:

“[N]oth­ing in today’s re­port min­im­izes the sig­ni­fic­ance of ef­forts by gov­ern­ments to ob­tain cus­tom­er in­form­a­tion out­side leg­al pro­cess. Since the Wash­ing­ton Post re­por­ted in Oc­to­ber about the pur­por­ted hack­ing of cables run­ning between data cen­ters of some of our com­pet­it­ors, this has been and re­mains a ma­jor con­cern across the tech sec­tor…. However, des­pite the Pres­id­ent’s re­form ef­forts and our abil­ity to pub­lish more in­form­a­tion, there has not yet been any pub­lic com­mit­ment by either the U.S. or oth­er gov­ern­ments to re­nounce the at­temp­ted hack­ing of In­ter­net com­pan­ies. We be­lieve the Con­sti­tu­tion re­quires that our gov­ern­ment seek in­form­a­tion from Amer­ic­an com­pan­ies with­in the rule of law.”

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion an­nounced last week that it would al­low In­ter­net com­pan­ies to dis­close gov­ern­ment data re­quests for con­sumer in­form­a­tion, a policy change res­ult­ing from ne­go­ti­ations between the tech com­pan­ies that had filed law­suits ar­guing for more lee­way in shar­ing with users in­form­a­tion about gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance ap­proved via the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court.

The an­nounce­ment was widely praised as a ne­ces­sary step for­ward by pri­vacy ad­voc­ates, though many, in­clud­ing sev­er­al mem­bers of Con­gress, quickly cau­tioned that more needed to be done. Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said that “fur­ther changes still must be en­acted in­to law by Con­gress.”

What We're Following See More »
PROCEDURES NOT FOLLOWED
Trump Not on Ballot in Minnesota
2 days ago
THE LATEST
MOB RULE?
Trump on Immigration: ‘I Don’t Know, You Tell Me’
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Perhaps Donald Trump can take a plebiscite to solve this whole messy immigration thing. At a Fox News town hall with Sean Hannity last night, Trump essentially admitted he's "stumped," turning to the audience and asking: “Can we go through a process or do you think they have to get out? Tell me, I mean, I don’t know, you tell me.”

Source:
BIG CHANGE FROM WHEN HE SELF-FINANCED
Trump Enriching His Businesses with Donor Money
4 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "nearly quintupled the monthly rent his presidential campaign pays for its headquarters at Trump Tower to $169,758 in July, when he was raising funds from donors, compared with March, when he was self-funding his campaign." A campaign spokesman "said the increased office space was needed to accommodate an anticipated increase in employees," but the campaign's paid staff has actually dipped by about 25 since March. The campaign has also paid his golf courses and restaurants about $260,000 since mid-May.

Source:
QUESTIONS OVER IMMIGRATION POLICY
Trump Cancels Rallies
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump probably isn't taking seriously John Oliver's suggestion that he quit the race. But he has canceled or rescheduled rallies amid questions over his stance on immigration. Trump rescheduled a speech on the topic that he was set to give later this week. Plus, he's also nixed planned rallies in Oregon and Las Vegas this month.

Source:
‘STRATEGY AND MESSAGING’
Sean Hannity Is Also Advising Trump
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump's Fox News brain trust keeps growing. After it was revealed that former Fox chief Roger Ailes is informally advising Trump on debate preparation, host Sean Hannity admitted over the weekend that he's also advising Trump on "strategy and messaging." He told the New York Times: “I’m not hiding the fact that I want Donald Trump to be the next president of the United States. I never claimed to be a journalist.”

Source:
×