Bad News for Obama’s Antiobesity Effort

A new study suggests that giving consumers greater access to healthy food doesn’t change eating habits.

LEIPZIG, GERMANY - MAY 23: A man with a large belly eats junk food on May 23, 2013 in Leipzig, Germany. According to statistics a majority of Germans are overweight and are comparatively heavier than people in most other countries in Europe.
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Clara Ritger
Feb. 3, 2014, 11:01 a.m.

With the obesity epi­dem­ic in full swing and mil­lions of Amer­ic­an liv­ing in neigh­bor­hoods where fruits and ve­get­ables are hard to come by, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion thought it saw a solu­tion: fund stores that will stock fresh, af­ford­able pro­duce in these de­prived areas.

But now, three years and $500 mil­lion in­to the fed­er­al Healthy Food Fin­an­cing Ini­ti­at­ive, there’s a prob­lem: A study sug­gests it’s not work­ing.

Adding su­per­mar­kets to areas with short sup­plies of fresh pro­duce does not lead to im­prove­ments in res­id­ents’ di­ets or health out­comes, ac­cord­ing to a re­port pub­lished Monday in the Feb­ru­ary is­sue of Health Af­fairs.

Re­search­ers stud­ied two com­par­able neigh­bor­hoods in Phil­adelphia, a city at the cen­ter of the fight against “food deserts” — the wonk­ish term for the pro­duce-poor areas.

When a gro­cery store was opened in one Phil­adelphia food desert, 26.7 per­cent of res­id­ents made it their main gro­cery store and 51.4 per­cent in­dic­ated us­ing it for any food shop­ping, the re­port found. But among the pop­u­la­tion that used the new su­per­mar­ket, the re­search­ers saw no sig­ni­fic­ant im­prove­ment in BMI, fruit and ve­get­able in­take, or per­cep­tions of food ac­cess­ib­il­ity, al­though there was a sig­ni­fic­ant im­prove­ment in per­cep­tion of ac­cess­ib­il­ity to fruits and ve­get­ables.

The re­port was au­thored by a team of re­search­ers from the Lon­don School of Hy­giene and Trop­ic­al Medi­cine and Penn State Uni­versity’s de­part­ments of so­ci­ology, an­thro­po­logy, and demo­graphy. The study was fun­ded by the Na­tion­al In­sti­tute of En­vir­on­ment­al Health Sci­ences with sup­port from the Pop­u­la­tion Re­search In­sti­tute, al­though neither had a hand in the re­search design, col­lec­tion, or ana­lys­is.

The re­search­ers com­pared the Phil­adelphia neigh­bor­hood that would soon re­ceive a new su­per­mar­ket to a sim­il­ar com­munity three miles away, hop­ing to avoid any cros­sov­er ef­fect from the open­ing of the new store. They polled the two com­munit­ies be­fore and after the store opened to see the ef­fect of the change.

The study needs to be rep­lic­ated in oth­er neigh­bor­hoods and oth­er parts of the United States to con­firm or re­fute these find­ings, said lead re­search­er Steven Cum­mins, pro­fess­or of pop­u­la­tion health at the Lon­don School of Hy­giene and Trop­ic­al Medi­cine. The res­ults do, however, mir­ror find­ings in the U.K., where re­search­ers cre­ated a sim­il­ar com­par­is­on of two neigh­bor­hoods in Scot­land and ob­served no net ef­fect on fruit and ve­get­able in­take.

And if the con­clu­sion is borne out, it would sug­gest that poli­cy­makers re­think the Healthy Food Fin­an­cing Ini­ti­at­ive if they want to pro­mote health­i­er eat­ing and health­i­er cit­izens.

There’s some evid­ence already to sup­port the con­clu­sion that ac­cess to healthy food needs to be paired with edu­ca­tion about con­sump­tion. The Phil­adelphia De­part­ment of Pub­lic Health stud­ied some 120,000 school­chil­dren ages 5 to 18 and found that obesity rates de­clined 5 per­cent between 2006 and 2010. When eval­u­at­ing by race and gender, Afric­an-Amer­ic­an boys dropped 8 per­cent and His­pan­ic girls 7 per­cent.

Those res­ults came after the city im­ple­men­ted nu­tri­tion edu­ca­tion in 1999 for all chil­dren eli­gible for food stamps, re­moved sug­ary drinks from school vend­ing ma­chines, switched from 2 per­cent to 1 per­cent milk in the cafet­er­ia, and cre­ated well­ness coun­cils made up of teach­ers and stu­dents in 171 schools.

Some 23.5 mil­lion people in the U.S. live in a food desert, ac­cord­ing to data from the USDA.

The Healthy Food Fin­an­cing Ini­ti­at­ive is the most ag­gress­ive of the White House’s pro­grams to fight obesity. But oth­er pro­grams also work to in­centiv­ize the con­sump­tion of fresh pro­duce, in­clud­ing provid­ing sub­sidies to ex­ist­ing bo­degas and mom-and-pop corner stores to in­crease the pres­ence of fresh pro­duce; en­cour­aging the ac­cept­ance of food stamps and vouch­ers at farm­er’s mar­kets; and in­sti­tut­ing fresh-fruit and ve­get­able pro­grams in low-in­come schools. It’s too early in­to the HF­FI pro­gram to see res­ults, an of­fi­cial at USDA said, but White House rep­res­ent­at­ives will meet Tues­day with rep­res­ent­at­ives from six healthy food ac­cess pro­jects across the coun­try to dis­cuss their pro­gress.

Com­munit­ies with less ac­cess to healthy foods are at an in­creased risk of obesity, dia­betes, and car­di­ovas­cu­lar dis­ease. But, Cum­mins said, there’s little evid­ence to sup­port that in­stalling a su­per­mar­ket im­proves pop­u­la­tion health, and his study would in­dic­ate that the con­verse is true.

Cum­mins said in an email that law­makers ought to con­sider policies that will change com­munity be­ha­vi­or to in­cor­por­ate healthy food in­to every­day di­ets.

“These might in­clude eco­nom­ic ini­ti­at­ives such as taxes on un­healthy foods and sub­sidies on healthy foods, mar­ket­ing ini­ti­at­ives that fo­cus on in-store pro­mo­tion of healthy food, and pro­grams that fo­cus on skills re­lated to buy­ing and cook­ing com­pon­ents of a bal­anced diet,” Cum­mins said.

Cum­mins isn’t alone. Food-policy ex­pert and former Hart­ford Food Sys­tem ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or Mark Winne said the move­ment to­ward im­prov­ing ac­cess to healthy food star­ted in the mid-1980s, when re­search­ers first un­covered the con­nec­tion between poverty, diet, and poor health out­comes.

“Our health policy is not con­nec­ted to our ag­ri­cul­ture policy,” Winne said. “The level of sub­sidy that we provide to corn, rice, wheat, and sug­ar pro­du­cers out­paces what we’re coun­ter­ing with those pro­grams to in­centiv­ize con­sump­tion of fruits and ve­get­ables. You see al­most noth­ing in terms of ac­tu­al sub­sidy for fresh fruits and ve­get­ables.”

Bil­lions of dol­lars of corn sub­sidies help lower the price of pack­aged foods that con­tain high amounts of high fructose corn syr­up, and the price of fruits and ve­get­ables just can’t com­pete, Winne said. Keep­ing the price of fruits and ve­get­ables down is one in­ter­ven­tion the gov­ern­ment can con­sider, in ad­di­tion to mak­ing them read­ily avail­able.

“Ac­cess, af­ford­ab­il­ity, edu­ca­tion would prob­ably be the three legs of the stool,” Winne said, de­scrib­ing how poli­cy­makers can ap­proach ef­forts to im­prov­ing health out­comes through food. “Reg­u­la­tion of the food in­dustry would be a fourth leg, par­tic­u­larly in ad­vert­ising to chil­dren and in loc­a­tion of fast-food res­taur­ants so that they’re not close to schools.”

These com­ple­ment­ary policies, he said, could spur be­ha­vi­or change as law­makers look to bring gro­cery stores to un­der­served com­munit­ies.

What We're Following See More »
Chef Jose Andres Campaigns With Clinton
2 hours ago
White House Weighs in Against Non-Compete Contracts
2 hours ago

"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."

House Investigators Already Sharpening Their Spears for Clinton
3 hours ago

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”

No Lobbying Clinton’s Transition Team
6 hours ago

Hillary Clinton's transition team has in place strict rules to limit the influence that lobbyists could have "in crafting the nominee’s policy agenda." The move makes it unlikely, at least for now, that Clinton would overturn Obama's executive order limiting the role that lobbyists play in government

Federal Government Employees Giving Money to Clinton
6 hours ago

Federal employees from 14 agencies have given nearly $2 million in campaign donations in the presidential race thus far, and 95 percent of the donations, totaling $1.9 million, have been to the Clinton campaign. Employees at the State Department, which Clinton lead for four years, has given 99 percent of its donations to the Democratic nominee.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.