Congress Poised to Renew Battle Over Online Sales Tax Legislation

Rep. Jason Chaffetz will introduce a bill Monday to expand states’ ability to levy taxes on online purchases.

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dustin Volz
June 10, 2015, 4 p.m.

The de­bate over In­ter­net taxes has re­sumed in Con­gress, and it’s as messy as ever.

Rep. Jason Chaf­fetz, who chairs the House Over­sight Com­mit­tee, is pre­par­ing to in­tro­duce on­line sales tax le­gis­la­tion Monday that would ex­pand the power of states to col­lect taxes from pur­chases made from out-of-state In­ter­net vendors such as eBay.

The le­gis­la­tion builds on a long-stalled Sen­ate meas­ure that has failed to gain trac­tion in the House — and it’s be­ing touted by some of its re­tail sup­port­ers as a “thread-the-needle com­prom­ise” that could ad­dress linger­ing con­cerns raised by tax-phobic con­ser­vat­ives.

Drafts of Chaf­fetz’s bill, dubbed the Re­mote Trans­ac­tion Par­ity Act, have been cir­cu­lat­ing for months.

But it’s not clear that Chaf­fetz’s pro­pos­al will be ac­cept­able to House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bob Good­latte, a key play­er in Con­gress’s en­dur­ing fight over In­ter­net taxes. The Vir­gin­ia Re­pub­lic­an in­stead has favored more lim­ited on­line sales tax le­gis­la­tion, ex­press­ing con­cern about the com­plex­ity of a bill that could force In­ter­net vendors to com­ply with the tax codes of sev­er­al states and loc­al­it­ies.

Good­latte earned lever­age in the on­line sales tax de­bate Tues­day, as the House passed by voice vote his bill that would make an ex­pir­ing ban on fed­er­al, state, and loc­al taxes on In­ter­net ac­cess per­man­ent. In ad­di­tion to bar­ring gov­ern­ments from ex­tract­ing those taxes, the bill would pro­hib­it levy­ing dis­crim­in­at­ory In­ter­net-spe­cif­ic taxes on things such as email or band­width.

A ban on In­ter­net ac­cess taxes is non­con­tro­ver­sial among most law­makers in both parties, and has been around since 1998, when it was en­acted to pro­tect busi­nesses that re­lied on the then-nas­cent World Wide Web.

But by hav­ing the House ap­prove a per­man­ent ban, as it did last year, Good­latte is short-cir­cuit­ing ef­forts by a hand­ful of bi­par­tis­an sen­at­ors to com­bine the ac­cess-tax morator­i­um with more con­tro­ver­sial and com­plic­ated on­line sales tax le­gis­la­tion.

Those sen­at­ors, in­clud­ing Minor­ity Whip Dick Durbin and Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Mi­chael En­zi, view the ac­cess tax morator­i­um as a vehicle to ad­opt their long-stalled Mar­ket­place Fair­ness Act, which would em­power states to tax pur­chases made from out-of-state on­line re­tail­ers with an­nu­al sales over $1 mil­lion. Boost­ers of the le­gis­la­tion say it would close an un­fair loop­hole that fa­vors on­line be­hemoths over brick-and-mor­tar re­tail­ers, and sup­ply states with ad­di­tion­al tax rev­en­ue. Its anti-tax op­pon­ents say it could kill jobs and stifle In­ter­net free­dom.

Ef­forts to pair the on­line-sales and ac­cess tax to­geth­er failed last year, but sen­at­ors sup­port­ing the Mar­ket­place Fair­ness Act in­tend to try again.

“The Mar­ket­place Fair­ness Act that would level the play­ing field for small busi­nesses passed over­whelm­ingly in the Sen­ate last Con­gress,” Durbin said in a state­ment. “I sup­port ex­tend­ing the morator­i­um on In­ter­net ac­cess taxes, but at the same time we should give states the abil­ity to col­lect sales and use taxes already owed on all sales — both in­ter­net and brick and mor­tar sales.”

Though the meas­ure passed the Sen­ate 69-27 in 2013, House lead­er­ship balked, as many of the cham­ber’s tea-party con­ser­vat­ives are squeam­ish about sup­port­ing any­thing that sounds like a tax hike.

The im­passe forced Speak­er John Boehner to prom­ise to re­vis­it the on­line sales tax this year in or­der to cor­ral sup­port for a one-year ac­cess tax ex­ten­sion passed in Decem­ber. But the punt doesn’t ap­pear to have changed Boehner’s cal­cu­lus, and Tues­day’s pas­sage of an­oth­er per­man­ent ac­cess tax ban has set the two cham­bers on a déjà vu col­li­sion course with little room for com­prom­ise. Still, des­pite hav­ing re­newed it four times, Con­gress has failed to agree to a per­man­ent morator­i­um, and the cur­rent ban will lift Oct. 1.

Some in the House, however, think this year might be dif­fer­ent. “The fact that the Sen­ate is run by Re­pub­lic­ans now makes us more op­tim­ist­ic that they can do something with our bill,” a House GOP aide said. And Chaf­fetz’s bill ap­pears to sig­ni­fy that the strategy is shift­ing for back­ers of on­line sales tax le­gis­la­tion from piggy­back­ing on the ban to build­ing con­sensus on a meas­ure out­right.

What We're Following See More »
Heller, Paul Won’t Vote on Motion to Proceed
12 hours ago
CBO Says 22 Million More Would Be UNinsured
13 hours ago

The Senate bill "would increase the number of people without health insurance by 22 million by 2026, a figure that is only slightly lower than the 23 million more uninsured that the House version would create. Next year, 15 million more people would be uninsured compared with current law...The legislation would decrease federal deficits by a total of $321 billion over a decade."

Cornyn Says Health Vote Needed This Week
17 hours ago
Kislyak Being Recalled to Russia
20 hours ago

"Ending one the most turbulent tenures of a Washington-based ambassador in recent memory, the Kremlin has decided to recall Ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak, three individuals familiar with the decision told BuzzFeed News. The decision to bring Kislyak back to Russia rather than appoint him to a senior position at the United Nations in New York, as several outlets previously reported, comes amid investigations by the FBI and Congress into the 66-year-old diplomat’s contacts with President Donald Trump’s top aides during the 2016 presidential campaign."

Deutsche Bank Gave Kushner a $285 Million Loan in October
1 days ago

"One month before Election Day, Jared Kushner’s real estate company finalized a $285 million loan as part of a refinancing package for its property near Times Square in Manhattan. The loan came at a critical moment. Kushner was playing a key role in the presidential campaign of his father-in-law, Donald Trump. The lender, Deutsche Bank, was negotiating to settle a federal mortgage fraud case and charges from New York state regulators that it aided a possible Russian money-laundering scheme."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.