Oversight Chairman: Obama Needs to Fire OPM Chief

“I think it’s time for them to resign, and if they don’t, I think the president should fire them,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz said of leadership at the Office of Personnel Management.

National Journal
June 16, 2015, 11:33 a.m.

The chair­man of the House Over­sight Com­mit­tee is ask­ing the lead­er­ship of the Of­fice of Per­son­nel Man­age­ment to resign amid rolling rev­el­a­tions about a massive hack of per­son­al data stored by the agency that has af­fected mil­lions of former and cur­rent fed­er­al em­ploy­ees.

“If they don’t,” Rep. Jason Chaf­fetz said, “I think the pres­id­ent should fire them.”

“If we want a dif­fer­ent res­ult, we’re gonna have to have dif­fer­ent people,” Chaf­fetz, a Utah Re­pub­lic­an, told re­port­ers Tues­day after at­tend­ing a clas­si­fied brief­ing for House mem­bers where OPM of­fi­cials dis­cussed the breach.

Chaf­fetz singled out OPM Dir­ect­or Kath­er­ine Archu­leta and OPM Chief In­form­a­tion Of­ficer Donna Sey­mour, both of whom test­i­fied earli­er in the day be­fore his com­mit­tee about the hack of its sys­tems that of­fi­cials have privately blamed on China. The breach ex­posed the data of at least 4.2 mil­lion in­di­vidu­als, though sev­er­al law­makers have sug­ges­ted it could be far high­er.

Chaf­fetz has held the gavel of the pan­el for six months, but he has earned a repu­ta­tion for be­ing less bom­bast­ic than his fiery pre­de­cessor, Rep. Dar­rell Issa, a Re­pub­lic­an from Cali­for­nia, and less prone to knee-jerk re­ac­tion.

Few mem­bers of Con­gress had come out to pub­licly call for OPM resig­na­tions, but the de­sire was echoed across party lines Tues­day. Earli­er in the day, Rep. Ted Lieu, a Cali­for­nia Demo­crat who holds a com­puter sci­ence de­gree from Stan­ford, con­demned a “high level of tech­no­lo­gic­al in­com­pet­ence” across gov­ern­ment and noted that when oth­er agen­cies are be­set by scan­dal, high-rank­ing of­fi­cials of­ten are forced to step down.

“I’m look­ing here today for a few good people to step for­ward, take re­spons­ib­il­ity, and resign for the good of the na­tion,” Lieu said.

House Home­land Se­cur­ity Chair­man Mi­chael Mc­Caul, a Texas Re­pub­lic­an, said he would wait un­til more in­form­a­tion was known be­fore ask­ing for any resig­na­tions. “Let’s see how the in­vest­ig­a­tion goes,” he told re­port­ers after the brief­ing.

Chaf­fetz and a bi­par­tis­an se­quence of law­makers spent nearly three hours Tues­day la­cer­at­ing Archu­leta and oth­ers for fail­ing to do more to shore up OPM’s cy­ber­de­fenses. Chaf­fetz poin­ted to a lit­any of in­spect­or gen­er­al re­ports is­sued in re­cent years that found the agency’s sys­tems out­dated and vul­ner­able, high­light­ing one is­sued last Novem­ber that called for some data­bases to be taken off­line be­cause they were so in­ad­equate. That re­com­mend­a­tion, in ad­di­tion to sev­er­al oth­ers — such as ad­op­tion of stand­ard en­cryp­tion stand­ards — went largely un­heeded by OPM lead­er­ship, which said Tues­day that it had greatly im­proved cy­ber­se­cur­ity in re­cent years.

Fol­low­ing the pub­lic hear­ing, Archu­leta and oth­er ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials led a clas­si­fied House­wide brief­ing to dis­cuss cer­tain ele­ments of the breach. Though she re­peatedly re­fused to an­swer ques­tions at the pub­lic hear­ing by say­ing cer­tain de­tails were clas­si­fied, Chaf­fetz and oth­er law­makers who at­ten­ded in­dic­ated the clas­si­fied fol­low-up did not yield much ad­di­tion­al in­form­a­tion.

“Quite frankly, I didn’t hear much clas­si­fied in the clas­si­fied brief­ing,” Chaf­fetz said. “There wasn’t a whole lot of in­form­a­tion there.”

When asked if the 4 mil­lion es­tim­ate for the num­ber of im­pacted people was ac­cur­ate, Rep. Jim Langev­in, a Rhode Is­land Demo­crat who co­chairs the con­gres­sion­al cy­ber­se­cur­ity caucus, said, “sig­ni­fic­antly more than that, giv­en what was taken and who else could be af­fected.”

Chaf­fetz also would not pin­point a pre­cise num­ber of in­di­vidu­als im­pacted by the hack, but sug­ges­ted it could bal­loon far high­er. Some re­ports have sug­ges­ted that data for 14 mil­lion em­ploy­ees may have been ex­posed.

“The only thing we know for sure is that it’s more than 4.2 mil­lion,” Chaf­fetz said. “How many more, I don’t know. They would not fess up to that.”

Langev­in said the clas­si­fied brief­ing was not well-at­ten­ded, not­ing that less than a fourth of House mem­bers showed up — though Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi and Minor­ity Whip Steny Hoy­er were spot­ted en­ter­ing the meet­ing. When asked how the U.S. should re­spond to the hack, he said that would be de­cided after the in­vest­ig­a­tion was com­plete.

“I sus­pect that we should take some strong ac­tions against the per­pet­rat­ors,” he said without rul­ing out sanc­tions or a “hack­ing back” re­sponse.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Delays Tariffs on Japanese and European Cars
3 days ago
Trump Unveils New Immigration Proposal
3 days ago
Trump Jr. Agrees to Testify in the Senate
5 days ago

"Donald Trump Jr. has struck a last minute deal to comply with a subpoena from the Senate Intelligence Committee ... Trump Jr. will sit for an interview some time in mid-June for between two and four hours, with the scope limited to five or six topics pertaining to his communications with Russian officials. This will be the last time Trump Jr. has to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee, according to the terms of the deal."

China Hits Back with Tariffs on $60B in U.S. Goods
6 days ago
China Raising Tariffs
1 weeks ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.