Court Revives Copyright Lawsuit Against Justin Bieber and Usher

Are the courts cracking down more aggressively now on music copyright infringement?

Simpler times: Usher and Justin Bieber dancing in their music video for "Somebody to Love" in 2010.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dustin Volz
June 18, 2015, 11:47 a.m.

A fed­er­al ap­peals court on Thursday re­vived a copy­right in­fringe­ment law­suit against Justin Bieber and Ush­er, mark­ing the latest in a string of high-pro­file de­cisions at­tempt­ing to cla­ri­fy the neb­u­lous dif­fer­ence between homage and theft in the mu­sic in­dustry.

A three-judge pan­el of the 4th Cir­cuit of the U.S. Court of Ap­peals un­an­im­ously ruled that there is suf­fi­cient reas­on to al­low a jury to con­sider wheth­er “Some­body to Love,” a 2010 chart-top­per from the two pop icons, bears too much re­semb­lance to an earli­er song of the same name re­cor­ded by two Vir­gin­ia mu­si­cians, Dev­in Cope­land and Mareio Over­ton.

“After listen­ing to the Cope­land song and the Bieber and Ush­er songs as wholes, we con­clude that their chor­uses are sim­il­ar enough and also sig­ni­fic­ant enough that a reas­on­able jury could find the songs in­trins­ic­ally sim­il­ar,” Judge Pamela Har­ris wrote for the court.

The case will now be sent to a lower fed­er­al court, where it was dis­missed more than a year ago on grounds that no reas­on­able jury would con­clude copy­right in­fringe­ment had oc­curred. But Har­ris said that the lower court erred by lean­ing too heav­ily on the dif­fer­ences between mu­sic genres and not enough on tech­nic­al spe­cif­ics of the songs, such as chord and beat sim­il­ar­it­ies.

“In our view, that ana­lys­is at­taches too much weight to what the dis­trict court termed a dif­fer­ence in ‘mood’ and ‘tone,’ and too little to sim­il­ar­it­ies between the “ele­ment” of the songs — their chor­uses — that is most im­port­ant,” Har­ris wrote. She ad­ded that “a reas­on­able jury could find that these small vari­ations would not pre­vent a mem­ber of the gen­er­al pub­lic from hear­ing sub­stan­tial sim­il­ar­ity.”

The ap­peals court de­cision comes just months after a fed­er­al jury ruled that Robin Thicke and Phar­rell’s 2013 hit “Blurred Lines” in­fringed on Mar­vin Gaye’s 1977 song “Got to Give It Up.” The jury in that case awar­ded more than $7 mil­lion in dam­ages to Gaye’s fam­ily — one of the largest dam­ages awards in the his­tory of mu­sic copy­right cases.

The chal­lenge against Bieber and Ush­er could be settled out of court and may not ul­ti­mately re­quire a jury to weigh in. In Janu­ary of this year, Sam Smith settled out of court with Tom Petty, who said the Brit­ish sing­er’s “Stay With Me” bal­lad bore too much re­semb­lance to his 1989 hit “I Won’t Back Down.”

The re­cord­ing in­dustry has stepped up its lob­by­ing of Con­gress over the past couple years as part of a con­cer­ted ef­fort to push for copy­right and mu­sic-li­cens­ing re­form. Most of the is­sues be­ing ad­voc­ated by the Re­cord­ing Academy and oth­ers in­volve the murk­i­ness sur­round­ing di­git­al ra­dio, such as lower roy­alty rates for In­ter­net stream­ing ser­vices and a loop­hole that grants few­er copy­right pro­tec­tions for songs re­cor­ded be­fore 1972. But the ef­forts also re­flect the com­plex­it­ies of dated mu­sic copy­right rules.

House Ju­di­ciary Chair­man Bob Good­latte last year began an ex­tens­ive re­view of the copy­right land­scape, which has not un­der­gone ma­jor re­vi­sions since 1976.

What We're Following See More »
Sens. Paul, Cruz, Johnson and Lee Oppose Senate Health Care Bill
16 hours ago

The four Senators released a joint statement, saying in part, "There are provisions in this draft that repreesnt an improvement to our current health care system, but it does not appear this draft as written will accomplish the most important promise we made to Americans: to repeal Obamacare and lower their health care costs."

No Comey Tapes
17 hours ago

Trump tweeted Thursday afternoon, "With all of the recently reported electronic surveillance, intercepts, unmasking and illegal leaking of information, I have no idea whether there are "tapes" or recordings of my conversations with James Comey, but I did not make, and do not have, any such recordings."

Senate Healthcare Bill In Trouble?
18 hours ago
Senate Republicans Unveil Healthcare Bill
19 hours ago
Scalise Upgraded to Fair Condition
1 days ago

MedStar Washington Hospital Center said in a statement, "Congressman Steve Scalise continues to make good progress. He is now listed in fair condition and is beginning an extended period of healing and rehabilitation."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.