This Freedom Caucus Member Has a Primary Problem

Tim Huelskamp is now in a one-on-one race.

Rep. Tim Huelskamp questions Veterans Affairs Secretary Robert McDonald about a pending Veterans Affairs health care budget shortfall and system shutdown during a House Veterans Affairs Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on July 22, 2015.
AP Photo/Cliff Owen
Kimberly Railey
Add to Briefcase
Kimberly Railey
May 5, 2016, 8 p.m.

Rep. Tim Huel­skamp’s reelec­tion just hit its first ma­jor hurdle.

The Kan­sas Re­pub­lic­an has con­fron­ted a com­pet­it­ive primary for months against two op­pon­ents in his deep-red dis­trict. But on Wed­nes­day, Alan LaPo­lice—who won 45 per­cent of the vote against Huel­skamp in 2014—dropped out of the primary and an­nounced he would run as an in­de­pend­ent, free­ing up anti-Huel­skamp voters to co­alesce around a single primary chal­lenger.

That leaves phys­i­cian Ro­ger Mar­shall and his sup­port­ers with fresh signs of hope of tak­ing out an in­cum­bent whose sup­port took a sig­ni­fic­ant hit last cycle.

“This is our best chance,” said Dee Likes, the former head of the Kan­sas Live­stock As­so­ci­ation, which is back­ing Mar­shall. “He is the highest qual­ity can­did­ate that’s run against Huel­skamp. And now it’s a bin­ary choice.”

Huel­skamp pulled out a primary win in 2014 against the little-known LaPo­lice by few­er than 8,000 votes. That closer-than-ex­pec­ted res­ult came after he voted against the farm bill, a key pri­or­ity in the heav­ily agrari­an 1st Dis­trict, which en­com­passes most of the west­ern half of the state. The House Free­dom Caucus mem­ber also faced back­lash in that race after be­ing stripped of his po­s­i­tion on the Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee thanks to his op­pos­i­tion to party lead­er­ship.

Since then, his op­pon­ents have ar­gued that a can­did­ate with a more for­mid­able cam­paign could de­feat him. Though they viewed Mar­shall as the stronger can­did­ate, LaPo­lice com­plic­ated his path by threat­en­ing to peel away votes in the Aug. 2 primary, which could again be de­cided by a tight mar­gin.

“This isn’t the in­cum­bent versus some un­known with no re­sources kind of primary,” said Clay Bark­er, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Kan­sas Re­pub­lic­an Party. “Mar­shall presents a le­git­im­ate chal­lenge to Huel­skamp. I’m not sure who is ahead right now.”

Huel­skamp spokes­man Mark Kelly said the con­gress­man is in strong shape for his reelec­tion, point­ing out the hun­dreds of town halls he has held in the dis­trict and his new­found in­flu­ence in Con­gress as a mem­ber of the House Steer­ing Com­mit­tee, the power­ful pan­el in charge of mak­ing com­mit­tee as­sign­ments.

“Des­pite at­tacks from some in­siders in Wash­ing­ton, I’m mak­ing a dif­fer­ence on a num­ber of is­sues and try­ing to change Wash­ing­ton,” Huel­skamp told Na­tion­al Journ­al earli­er this year.

Since gain­ing the Steer­ing Com­mit­tee slot, Huel­skamp has said he ex­pects to re­turn to the Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee. But that pro­cess will not be­gin un­til the fall, after the Novem­ber elec­tions.

“I haven’t had any con­ver­sa­tions with him,” Ag­ri­cul­ture Chair­man Mike Con­away said in a brief in­ter­view in the Cap­it­ol last week. “Noth­ing is a sure bet.” Kelly said the con­gress­man has spoken with mem­bers of the Steer­ing Com­mit­tee and party lead­er­ship about the pan­el.

In the mean­time, Mar­shall picked up sup­port from key ag­ri­cul­ture groups, in­clud­ing the Kan­sas Live­stock As­so­ci­ation and the Dairy Farm­ers of Amer­ica. He is also draw­ing more fin­an­cial sup­port than Huel­skamp, out­rais­ing the in­cum­bent in the past four fun­drais­ing quar­ters. But as of March 31, Huel­skamp had $837,000 in cash on hand, while Mar­shall had $484,000, pad­ded by $218,000 in per­son­al loans and con­tri­bu­tions.

“There are some folks that are very in­ter­ested in look­ing at Mar­shall,” said War­ren Park­er, dir­ect­or of policy com­mu­nic­a­tions at the Kan­sas Farm Bur­eau. “Mar­shall is cer­tainly do­ing his work out there.”

Mar­shall is act­ively high­light­ing Huel­skamp’s re­mov­al from the Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee. In a state­ment, he called the con­gress­man “a re­cur­ring em­bar­rass­ment to Re­pub­lic­ans in Kan­sas.”

The Kan­sas Farm Bur­eau de­clined to back Huel­skamp in 2014, angered by his farm bill vote. This cycle, the group hasn’t is­sued an en­dorse­ment yet.

In choos­ing to run as an in­de­pend­ent, LaPo­lice cited his dis­en­chant­ment with both parties and ac­know­ledged that Mar­shall now has an easi­er path in the primary.

“My leav­ing the primary gives Dr. Mar­shall a bet­ter op­por­tun­ity at po­ten­tially win­ning it,” LaPo­lice said. “But that is not my mo­tiv­a­tion.” LaPo­lice ad­ded that he still be­lieves in “tra­di­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an val­ues.”

The Now or Nev­er PAC, which spent $234,000 in 2014 to op­pose Huel­skamp, will not en­gage in the race this time. But the main donor be­hind the group, Cecil O’Brate, who donated to Mar­shall, said in a state­ment that Mar­shall will keep re­ceiv­ing the “full breadth of our sup­port,” in­clud­ing fin­an­cial help.

Oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans said Huel­skamp’s no-holds-barred style is what will en­dear him to GOP voters. In a sign that Huel­skamp is tak­ing his reelec­tion ser­i­ously, he is skip­ping the Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Con­ven­tion and plans to spend the fi­nal two weeks be­fore the primary cam­paign­ing in Kan­sas.

“Tim Huel­skamp is a man who says what he means and means what he says,” said Randy Duncan, the 1st Dis­trict Re­pub­lic­an Party chair­man. “I am con­fid­ent he will win reelec­tion.”

Some Re­pub­lic­ans pre­dicted the race could eas­ily evolve ahead of the Aug. 2 primary in­to a spend­ing battle­ground for both fac­tions of the GOP, giv­en its re­l­at­ively in­ex­pens­ive me­dia mar­kets.

In Decem­ber, Na­tion­al Re­view re­por­ted that the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce may tar­get Huel­skamp. If the in­cum­bent looks in­creas­ingly en­dangered, he will have the sup­port of at least one of his con­ser­vat­ive al­lies, Freedom­Works, ac­cord­ing to the group’s spokes­man Jason Pye, who left open the pos­sib­il­ity that the group’s PAC could make in­de­pend­ent ex­pendit­ures on Huel­skamp’s be­half.

“I’d prob­ably say right now it’s prob­ably about a 60-40 like­li­hood that Huel­skamp would win,” said Chap­man Rack­away, a former GOP strategist who is now a polit­ic­al sci­ence pro­fess­or at Fort Hays State Uni­versity. “But the LaPo­lice exit really makes a clear­er path and strategy for Mar­shall.”

What We're Following See More »
AND POLICE OFFICERS IN EVERY SCHOOL
Gov. Scott Wants to Raise Gun-Purchase Age to 21
1 days ago
THE LATEST
IN THE WAKE OF NEW CHARGES
Gates Expected to Plead Guilty, Cooperate with Mueller
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is expected to plead guilty to a raft of new tax and fraud charges filed against him by special counsel Robert Mueller on Thursday. Gates is expected to cooperate with Mueller's investigation.

Source:
32 COUNTS
Mueller Hits Manafort, Gates with New Charges
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Robert Mueller announced new charges against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort advisor Rick Gates. "The new indictment contains 32 counts, including tax charges." The pair had been indicted on 12 charges in October. Since then, Gates's attorneys have asked to be excused from the case.

Source:
SECOND TIME FBI FAILED TO ACT
FBI Failed To Act On Parkland Shooter Tip
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

The FBI has reported that it failed to respond to a warning from "a person close to" Nikolas Cruz, the teen accused of killing 17 people at Parkland High School on Thursday. "It was the second time the FBI apparently failed to follow up on Cruz." On the first occasion, it failed to properly investigate Cruz after it was reported to them that he left the following comment on a Youtube video: "Im going to be a school shooter."

Source:
FBI MISSED TIP ON PARKLAND SHOOTER
Florida Governor Calls on FBI Director to Resign
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Florida Governor Rick Scott called on FBI Director Christopher Wray to resign following revelations that the FBI had failed to adequately investigate multiple warnings about Parkland High School gunman Nikolas Cruz. “The FBI’s failure to take action against this killer is unacceptable,'" said Scott. '...We constantly promote ‘see something, say something,’ and a courageous person did just that to the FBI. And the FBI failed to act.'" According to an FBI statement, the FBI failed to inform local offices of information regarding "Cruz's desire to kill people, erratic behavior, disturbing social media posts, as well as the potential of him conducting a school shooting."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login