Whoever thought “America the Beautiful” and Cheerios could be so controversial?
While a puppy and a horse won the hearts of Super Bowl viewers, a growing biracial family explained through Cheerios and a familiar song sung in various languages ignited a conversation.
Donna Butts is executive director of Generations United, a Washington-based membership organization of more than 100 groups that seek to improve the lives of children, youth, and older people through intergenerational strategies, programs, and public policies. (Courtesy photo)Wake up and smell the demographics. America, are you open?
To try to find out, Generations United and the Generations Initiative commissioned a survey, engaged thought leaders and emerging experts, and together in December released the report “Out of Many One: Uniting the Changing Faces of America.”
Our public-opinion survey, conducted by Harris Interactive, found that Americans as a whole are aware of the changing age and race demographics in the U.S., and they are generally accepting of them. In fact 66 percent agree they are optimistic about the opportunities presented by the changing makeup of our communities.
While younger respondents were more likely to see the changes as positive compared with older respondents, the vast majority across generations and races reported they were positive or at least neutral about the changes. This suggests an environment which is open and ripe for policies to foster connections across age and race.
Our survey findings would help explain why the Twitter explosion that erupted around Coke’s “America the Beautiful” commercial was so heated.
There were some pretty petty tweets, but even more praised the sentiment the singers conveyed and the risk the company took. Many people said they were moved by the faces and scenarios, all of which touch on our country’s powerful founding narrative: E pluribus unum — “Out of many, one.”
Throughout our history, our coming together as one America across race, age, and other differences has made our nation stronger. The changes we face today push this narrative like never before. The question is, are you open?
First, we’re living longer and healthier. By 2043, one in five U.S. residents will be 65 or older. What a wonderful wealth of untapped human capital asset, an asset we can and should engage beginning today.
Second, we’re more racially and ethnically diverse. By 2042 more than half of the nation will be people of color.
Taken together, there is a growing race and age gap. Today more than half of Americans under 5 are people of color, compared with less than one in five Americans older than 65.
Unlike other countries, we are age-advantaged. Our young population will continue to grow for decades to come. We must, however, be sure to make the proper investments so our young people have healthy beginnings and flourish academically.
In our report, we challenged the experts to use an intergenerational lens, one that values all ages, and take a fresh look at issues facing our country. Could they come up with disruptive ideas that might unite generations and strengthen our communities? The results were thought-provoking.
For example, take aging-in-place and the student-debt crisis.
Most people want to age in the same communities where they currently reside. It’s healthier and a more cost-effective way to support older adults who can live independently with some assistance.
At the same time, young people are burdened by huge student debt that threatens to inhibit them for years to come.
Our recommendation? Encourage “home share” agreements that reduce student loans in exchange for students taking on tasks that enable older adults to age in place.
When the diverse voices of our people were raised together in a commercial, “America the Beautiful” was pitch-perfect. In any language it’s a moving song, a testament to the incredible strength of our country. A country made stronger by its diverse people. Are you open?
What We're Following See More »
"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."
Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."
NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.
"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."
In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shunning traditional debate preparations, but has been watching video of…Clinton’s best and worst debate moments, looking for her vulnerabilities.” Trump “has paid only cursory attention to briefing materials. He has refused to use lecterns in mock debate sessions despite the urging of his advisers. He prefers spitballing ideas with his team rather than honing them into crisp, two-minute answers.”