Why Outside Spending Never Arrived for Stutzman

In a memo, the Club for Growth cited concerns over the congressman’s campaign to explain its lack of support.

Indiana Republican Senate candidates Todd Young (left) and Marlin Stutzman at a debate in Indianapolis on April 18
AP Photo/Michael Conroy
May 4, 2016, 8:01 p.m.

After endorsing Republican Rep. Marlin Stutzman of Indiana in July, the Club for Growth stopped bundling money for his Senate campaign within five months, citing concerns about the campaign’s leadership and Stutzman’s “discipline as a candidate.”

In a memo sent to the group’s board members Wednesday and shared with National Journal, Club President David McIntosh, a former congressman from Indiana, outlined a nearly yearlong struggle for competency from a campaign once viewed as one of the fiscal-conservative group’s best opportunities on the Senate map.

“Ultimately, [we] decided against spending money on independent expenditures in this race because it appeared the shortcomings in Stutzman’s campaign were compounding,” McIntosh said in the memo.

The Club was far from alone in abandoning Stutzman, who lost by 34 points in the GOP primary Tuesday to national Republicans’ preferred candidate, Rep. Todd Young.

After being shut down in nearly every race they took on in 2014, conservative strategists this cycle pledged a new focus on getting qualified candidates to run. In three open-seat races—Indiana, Florida, and Louisiana—the conservative groups lined up behind three House Freedom Caucus members, touting them as part of their new promote-from-within-strategy.

But in the first of those Senate primaries, Stutzman was outspent 9-to-1 by Young and his allies. Groups that antagonized the tea party in recent years, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, steamrolled Stutzman with negative ads, spending a total of $2.5 million for Young. National Republicans saw Young as a stronger nominee against Democratic former Rep. Baron Hill, whom Young unseated in 2010. Among the cadre of conservative groups that supported Stutzman, only Citizens United Political Victory Fund ran radio ads for his candidacy.

So what happened to the new and improved strategy for the tea party? In interviews with a handful of conservative strategists, Stutzman allies lamented the missed opportunity—while putting most of the blame on a candidate they said “made his own luck.”

One national conservative strategist, who requested anonymity to speak candidly, said his group had planned to host a fundraiser for Stutzman but ultimately opted against it.

“It was an opportunity wasted,” the strategist said. “We could have and should have won if the candidate had run a more ideal campaign, without controversy, without baggage.”

In particular, Stutzman’s allies were irritated by staff turnover, Stutzman’s decision to join Democrats in a challenge to keep Young off the ballot, and a news report in the final weeks alleging he used campaign funds to pay for a family vacation. They also panned his team for not going after Young and allowing Stutzman to be cast as a political insider.

Jordan Gehrke, a conservative consultant who ran Sen. Ben Sasse’s campaign in Nebraska in 2014, penned a memo Tuesday titled “Candidates Matter,” in which he said that Stutzman “acted like once he had the support of” outside groups, “he did not have to do the work of running a good campaign.

“In Indiana, but in a Republican primary, in an outsider year when conservatives are so angry at Washington, DC, the decision not to define the campaign by getting to Young’s right and staying there is perplexing,” Gehrke wrote.

Young’s team of operatives from Cavalry LLC, aligned with the National Republican Senatorial Committee, take full credit for aggressively defining Stutzman early and turning him into a candidate even his conservative base couldn’t swallow.

Polling provided by Cavalry from the week before the primary showed self-described Donald Trump supporters viewing Stutzman as a “career politician” who spent “too long in politics.” The respondents repeated nearly in verbatim the digital attack ads the group targeted at voters searching or sharing information about Trump and Ted Cruz in the month leading up to the vote.

Along with the millions in TV ads, by specifically undermining Stutzman’s conservative credentials with voters turning out for outsider presidential candidates, Young consultant John Ashbrook said, they were able to minimize the impact of an expanded electorate that was expected to work in Stutzman’s favor.

“The most successful campaigns always define their opposition early,” said Ashbrook, who helped orchestrate a similar strategy for Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama earlier this year.

Conservative groups endorsed two of Stutzman’s fellow Freedom Caucus members in crowded Senate primaries for Republican-held open seats: Rep. Ron DeSantis, in the race to replace Sen. Marco Rubio in Florida, and Rep. John Fleming for retiring Sen. David Vitter’s seat in Louisiana.

While conservative strategists point to successful candidates, such as state Sen. Jim Banks in the race for Stutzman’s House seat, as proof they’re still making progress this cycle, McIntosh’s letter issued a stern warning to future Club endorsees. The PAC, he wrote, would not be afraid to withdraw support from any candidate whose “campaign operations lack the capacity” necessary to run a winning race.

That sentiment was echoed by another strategist who said the decision to abandon Stutzman was reflective of a conservative movement that has grown more conscious of jeopardizing Republican seats in a volatile political environment.

“There’s concern about the Trump effect on down-ballot races, especially in a state like Indiana, where Republicans lost the Senate race in 2012,” the strategist said. “Stutzman was already making a lot of errors … that could be toxic in the general election.”

What We're Following See More »
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 weeks ago

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 weeks ago

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

House Passes Funding Deal
1 weeks ago

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.