U.S. senators restated fears over the strategy for Iran talks, as a congressional sanctions push gradually has lost momentum, the Wall Street Journal reports.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee members on Tuesday said risks would be significant if upcoming multilateral talks do not resolve suspicions that Iran is nurturing a latent nuclear-arms capacity through its ostensibly peaceful atomic-energy activities.
High-level staffers said the Senate’s leadership has faced fewer calls in the last several weeks to permit floor consideration of possible new sanctions against Iran. Meanwhile, Tehran is set this month to begin negotiations with the five permanent U.N. Security Council member nations and Germany on a potential long-term nuclear deal.
In an effort to spur the talks along, the “P-5+1” nations agreed in November to relax certain economic restrictions against the Middle Eastern nation in return for limits on some of its nuclear efforts.
Panel Chairman Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), a proponent of additional economic steps, said he is “convinced that we should only relieve pressure on Iran in return for verifiable concessions that will fundamentally dismantle Iran’s nuclear program.”
The Obama administration’s senior Iran negotiator, though, continued to insist that fresh sanctions could derail the negotiations.
“It is crucial we give diplomacy a chance to succeed,” Under Secretary of State Wendy Sherman said.
The senior diplomat added that a possible Russian-Iranian petroleum barter plan does not appear likely to move forward for the time being, Reuters reported. The arrangement might have provided $1.5 billion in new monthly income to Iran.
“We are very crystal clear that anything like such an agreement between Russia and Iran might have potential sanctionable action and would likely create tremendous risk within the P-5+1, which would make coming to a comprehensive agreement all the more difficult if not impossible,” Sherman told the committee.
At the same time, Obama officials said they are routinely talking with Turkish counterparts about a separate barter arrangement that has allowed Iran access to as much as $100 billion in petroleum revenues by circumventing economic penalties already in force, the Journal reported.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."