Rep. Henry Waxman may be retiring, but a blitz of fourth-quarter fundraising ensures that he’ll leave office atop a pile of campaign cash.
In the last quarter of 2013, Waxman outpaced more than 90 percent of his House colleagues as he raised $371,347. It was the California Democrat’s biggest fundraising quarter of the year, and it left him with $757,269 in the bank.
Now that he’s leaving Congress, Waxman won’t have to spend any of that money on campaigning. Instead, he is free to use the account as a political piggy bank to dole out campaign contributions to friends and allies on Capitol Hill after he leaves office.
Such an account could prove especially useful if Waxman, 74, decamps to K Street, as so many of his predecessors have, where his former colleagues will almost certainly dial him up for donations.
There is nothing illegal about Waxman vacuuming up campaign contributions before heading for the exit. He follows in the footsteps of many others, most notably former Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh, who left office in 2010 with a $10 million campaign treasury.
After 40 years in Congress, in which Waxman has been one of the most effective liberal legislators of the modern era, he is not independently wealthy. He ranked as the 187th richest lawmaker in the House in 2012, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, with a net worth between $667,000 and $1.7 million.
Waxman has not said exactly when he decided to retire, and his office did not return a call for comment Wednesday. Among his fourth-quarter donors were billionaire media mogul Haim Saban and his wife ($10,400), former Los Angeles Deputy Mayor Austin Beutner ($5,200), investor Marc Nathanson ($5,200) and businesswoman Lynda Resnick ($5,200). Waxman also tapped political action committees of Boeing, Univision, Blue Shield, Verizon, and the Service Employees International Union, among others, for $5,000 apiece.
His fourth-quarter haul — only two dozen or so House members raised more — wasn’t just his biggest of 2013, it was nearly as much as his total in all of 2011, his last nonelection year, when he collected $388,990 (of which $199, 242 was in the fourth quarter). Waxman’s 2012 election, in which he was challenged by a wealthy independent opponent, was his toughest fight in decades.
Waxman told the Los Angeles Times‘ Doyle McManus that not having to ask for money anymore would be one of the benefits of retirement.
“Now I don’t have to spend any time raising money,” he said. McManus reported Waxman said so with a broad grin.
What We're Following See More »
The Supreme Court announced "that it would consider a challenge to President Trump’s latest effort to limit travel from countries said to pose a threat to the nation’s security." The case concerns Trump's most recent attempt to make good on a campaign promise "tainted by religious animus" and only questionably justified by national security concerns. The decision to take the case, called Trump v. Hawaii, comes almost exactly a year after Trump issued the first travel ban. The ban under consideration affects Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea.
Trump wants to move the two grants, the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas grant and the Drug Free Communities Act, to the Justice and Health and Human Services departments, respectively. This would result in a $300 million plus reduction in funding, about 95 percent of the cost of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. "'I’m baffled at the idea of cutting the office or reducing it significantly and taking away its programs in the middle of an epidemic,'" said Regina LaBelle, who served as ONDCP chief of staff during the Obama administration. This is the second time the Trump Administration has proposed gutting the agency.
A new report assembled by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has identified more than 500 potential conflicts of interest in President Trump's first year. First, the report notes, Trump spent 122 days at his properties during his first year. He has been accompanied by 70 federal officials and 30 members of Congress. "Second, far from this signaled access to power being an empty promise, those who patronize President Trump’s businesses have, in fact, gained access to the president and his inner circle." Lastly, about 40 special interest groups and 11 foreign governments have held events at Trump properties.