Rep. Henry Waxman may be retiring, but a blitz of fourth-quarter fundraising ensures that he’ll leave office atop a pile of campaign cash.
In the last quarter of 2013, Waxman outpaced more than 90 percent of his House colleagues as he raised $371,347. It was the California Democrat’s biggest fundraising quarter of the year, and it left him with $757,269 in the bank.
Now that he’s leaving Congress, Waxman won’t have to spend any of that money on campaigning. Instead, he is free to use the account as a political piggy bank to dole out campaign contributions to friends and allies on Capitol Hill after he leaves office.
Such an account could prove especially useful if Waxman, 74, decamps to K Street, as so many of his predecessors have, where his former colleagues will almost certainly dial him up for donations.
There is nothing illegal about Waxman vacuuming up campaign contributions before heading for the exit. He follows in the footsteps of many others, most notably former Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh, who left office in 2010 with a $10 million campaign treasury.
After 40 years in Congress, in which Waxman has been one of the most effective liberal legislators of the modern era, he is not independently wealthy. He ranked as the 187th richest lawmaker in the House in 2012, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, with a net worth between $667,000 and $1.7 million.
Waxman has not said exactly when he decided to retire, and his office did not return a call for comment Wednesday. Among his fourth-quarter donors were billionaire media mogul Haim Saban and his wife ($10,400), former Los Angeles Deputy Mayor Austin Beutner ($5,200), investor Marc Nathanson ($5,200) and businesswoman Lynda Resnick ($5,200). Waxman also tapped political action committees of Boeing, Univision, Blue Shield, Verizon, and the Service Employees International Union, among others, for $5,000 apiece.
His fourth-quarter haul — only two dozen or so House members raised more — wasn’t just his biggest of 2013, it was nearly as much as his total in all of 2011, his last nonelection year, when he collected $388,990 (of which $199, 242 was in the fourth quarter). Waxman’s 2012 election, in which he was challenged by a wealthy independent opponent, was his toughest fight in decades.
Waxman told the Los Angeles Times‘ Doyle McManus that not having to ask for money anymore would be one of the benefits of retirement.
“Now I don’t have to spend any time raising money,” he said. McManus reported Waxman said so with a broad grin.
What We're Following See More »
Just a day after Donald Trump called her a bigot, Hillary Clinton delivered a scathing speech tying Trump to the KKK and so-called “alt-right.” This new frontier of debate between the two candidates has emerged at a time when Trump has been seeking to appeal to minority voters, among whom he has struggled to garner support. Calling him “profoundly dangerous,” Clinton didn’t hold back on her criticisms of Trump. “He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party,” Clinton said.
Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 51%-41% in a new Quinnipiac poll released today. Her lead shrinks to seven points when the third-party candidates are included. In that scenario, she leads 45%-38%, with Gary Johnson pulling 10% and Jill Stein at 4%.
Is the Clinton family backtracking on some of its promises to insulate the White House from the Clinton Foundation? Opposition researchers will certainly try to portray it that way. A foundation spokesman said yesterday that Chelsea Clinton will stay on its board, and that the "foundation’s largest project, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, might continue to accept foreign government and corporate funding."
"Four Iranian ships made reckless maneuvers close to a U.S. warship this week, the Pentagon said Thursday, in an incident that officials said could have led to dangerous escalation." The four Iranian vessels engaged in a "high-speed intercept" of a U.S. destroyer in the Strait of Hormuz. A Navy spokesman said the Iranina actions "created a dangerous, harassing situation that could have led to further escalation including additional defensive measures" by the destroyer.