Target Data Breach Has Congress Eying Data-Security Alternatives

A key Republican said Wednesday that the string of data thefts dictated a hard look at national policy.

Upton: In the pipeline loop.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Feb. 5, 2014, 11:27 a.m.

Con­gress will con­sider new ap­proaches to data se­cur­ity in the wake of ma­jor data thefts at Tar­get and oth­er re­tail­ers, a key House Re­pub­lic­an said Wed­nes­day.

Rep. Fred Up­ton — the top Re­pub­lic­an on the power­ful House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee — sug­ges­ted that Con­gress may need to tackle cus­tom­er data se­cur­ity “dif­fer­ently” than the cur­rent sys­tem, where data pro­tec­tion is dic­tated by a patch­work of fed­er­al and state reg­u­la­tions.

“Breaches, iden­tity theft, and fin­an­cial fraud con­tin­ue, af­fect­ing every sec­tor from the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment to mer­chants, banks, uni­versit­ies, and hos­pit­als,” Up­ton said in his open­ing re­marks. “We must con­sider wheth­er the cur­rent mul­tilay­er ap­proach to data se­cur­ity — fed­er­al, state, and in­dustry self-reg­u­la­tion — can be more ef­fect­ive, or wheth­er we need to ap­proach the is­sue dif­fer­ently.”

Up­ton didn’t spe­cify what le­gis­lat­ive ap­proach he might fa­vor, but his en­dorse­ment of any bill cre­at­ing a na­tion­al re­port­ing stand­ard that would re­quire re­tail­ers to no­ti­fy cus­tom­ers when their data is at risk could go a long way to­ward con­vin­cing his fel­low House Re­pub­lic­ans that such a meas­ure is needed.

Up­ton nev­er ac­ted on a pre­vi­ous meas­ure backed by former Rep. Mary Bono back in 2011 that would have cre­ated a na­tion­al stand­ard. The bill nev­er gained any mo­mentum in Up­ton’s com­mit­tee after it cleared the Com­merce, Man­u­fac­tur­ing, and Trade Sub­com­mit­tee, which Bono chaired at the time. Bono, a Cali­for­nia Re­pub­lic­an who now works as a data-se­cur­ity ad­viser with Fae­greBD Con­sult­ing, told Na­tion­al Journ­al last month that Up­ton was sup­port­ive at the time but that the is­sue failed to climb un­to the pan­el’s dock­et.

Demo­crats, mean­while, worry that Con­gress could pass a pa­per-ti­ger stand­ard that could po­ten­tially un­der­mine stronger state pro­tec­tions. And they ad­di­tion­ally are clam­or­ing for le­gis­la­tion that would boost the Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion’s power to pun­ish com­pan­ies that provide in­ad­equate se­cur­ity. At a hear­ing earli­er in the week, Demo­crat­ic Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren de­clared, “Data-se­cur­ity prob­lems aren’t go­ing to go away on their own, so Con­gress ser­i­ously needs to con­sider wheth­er to strengthen the FTC’s hand.”

Re­tail­ers have been quick to tell Con­gress they need one na­tion­al re­port­ing stand­ard for data breaches in the wake of alarm­ing thefts un­covered at Tar­get, Nei­man Mar­cus, Mi­chaels Stores, and White Lodging. But calls for fed­er­al reg­u­la­tion from such busi­nesses have largely fallen on deaf ears with­in the Re­pub­lic­an caucus, where many law­makers are leery of en­croach­ing on the private sec­tor.

That sen­ti­ment was on dis­play at Wed­nes­day’s con­gres­sion­al hear­ing, the third in as many days con­vened to re­view data se­cur­ity. Re­pub­lic­an Lee Terry, chair­man of the Com­merce, Man­u­fac­tur­ing and Trade Sub­com­mit­tee, said he is “work­ing on le­gis­la­tion that would foster quick­er no­ti­fic­a­tion by re­pla­cing the mul­tiple — and some­times con­flict­ing — state no­ti­fic­a­tion re­gimes with a single, uni­form no­ti­fic­a­tion re­gime.”

But Terry also re­it­er­ated that “cum­ber­some stat­utory man­dates can be ill-equipped to deal with evolving threats.” FTC Chair­wo­man Edith Ramirez again countered that as­sump­tion, testi­fy­ing as she did earli­er this week that con­gres­sion­al ac­tion is “ne­ces­sary.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×