Republicans See Planned Parenthood Videos as Boost For 20-Week Abortion Ban

The House says the videos show the need for its legislation, but the Senate isn’t planning on taking it up anytime soon.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) (R), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) speak about immigration during a news conference on Capitol Hill, April 25, 2013 in Washington, DC. The news conference was held to discuss immigration control issues that are before Congress.
National Journal
Caitlin Owens
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Caitlin Owens
July 23, 2015, 4 p.m.

As GOP lead­ers de­bate how to pro­ceed with a push to de­fund Planned Par­ent­hood, some House Re­pub­lic­ans are us­ing the video con­tro­versy to pres­sure the Sen­ate in­to act­ing on a 20-week abor­tion ban bill.

They say the re­la­tion­ship between videos that have gone vir­al de­pict­ing a Planned Par­ent­hood of­fi­cial dis­cuss­ing fetal tis­sue and or­gans, and the an­ti­abor­tion le­gis­la­tion passed this year in the House, is that tis­sue is more use­ful the older and more de­veloped the fetus is.

The catch is that Sen­ate lead­er­ship is, at best, busy with the high­way le­gis­la­tion and, at worst, wor­ried about cre­at­ing a polit­ic­al mess.

Pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham has in­tro­duced a 20-week ban in the Sen­ate, and Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell said last month the bill would get a vote at some point.

GOP pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates could use it to flex their muscles on con­ser­vat­ive prin­ciples. However, it would not be good for vul­ner­able sen­at­ors up for reelec­tion in 2016, who would in­stantly be ac­cused of join­ing in on the war on wo­men.

“This could be more than they bar­gain for,” Dan Mendel­son, CEO of Avalere Health, an in­de­pend­ent con­sult­ing firm, wrote in an email. “While the present press cycle is gen­er­at­ing some mo­mentum among con­ser­vat­ives, there are reas­ons why the 20-[week] ban has not been en­acted — it’s gen­er­ally op­posed by mod­er­ates. Re­stric­tions on abor­tion also have a way of en­er­giz­ing the Left — which is prob­ably not something Re­pub­lic­ans want to do at this point.”

But the House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee is ur­ging a vote as soon as pos­sible, ac­cord­ing to a com­mit­tee aide.

“The pro­spects of al­ter­ing an abor­tion pro­ced­ure in or­der to pre­serve in­tact the or­gans of abor­ted chil­dren, in­clud­ing their brains, re­minds us yet again of the hor­rors of late-term abor­tions, and the need for the Sen­ate to pass the Pain-Cap­able Un­born Child Pro­tec­tion Act,” the com­mit­tee wrote in a state­ment after the re­lease of the first video last week.

Mc­Con­nell has not yet an­nounced a sched­ule bey­ond the high­ways le­gis­la­tion, and lead­er­ship is fo­cus­ing on get­ting that done.

“I want to get a trans­port­a­tion bill passed. That’s what we’re fo­cused on right now,” Sen. John Bar­rasso said.

But, House mem­bers said, the videos and sub­sequent up­roar present an op­por­tune mo­ment for the le­gis­la­tion that might not al­ways be there.

“I would urge them to take it up wheth­er the video came out or not, but this gives a little bit more im­min­ence to it, be­cause it could push late-term abor­tions,” Rep. Joe Pitts said.

Sen. Or­rin Hatch, chair­man of the Fin­ance Com­mit­tee, said the le­gis­la­tion should not be brought up “in the middle of the high­way bill.”

“I don’t think we should stop what we’re do­ing right now, which is also very im­port­ant,” he said. “That should be brought up in an ap­pro­pri­ate time when people’s minds are on it and when a case could be made.”

But he does think it’s an im­port­ant dis­cus­sion to be had.

“Nobody wants to get in­to an abor­tion fight here, but you can’t ig­nore what they’re do­ing,” Hatch said. “You don’t have to be an­ti­abor­tion to feel that way. I think any reas­on­able per­son would say, ‘Oh my gosh, how far are they go­ing to go on this ap­proach?’ They’ve gone too far.”

What We're Following See More »
Facebook to Cooperate with Congress
10 hours ago
Trump Praises Erdogan
10 hours ago
Trump Makes Good on Promise of New North Korea Sanctions
11 hours ago

President Trump this afternoon announced another round of sanctions on North Korea, calling the regime "a continuing threat." The executive order, which Trump relayed to Congress, bans any ship or plane that has visited North Korea from visiting the United States within 180 days. The order also authorizes sanctions on any financial institution doing business with North Korea, and permits the secretaries of State and the Treasury to sanction any person involved in trading with North Korea, operating a port there, or involved in a variety of industries there.

Trump Promises More Sanctions on North Korea
14 hours ago

In response to a reporter's question, President Trump said "he’ll be looking to impose further financial penalties on North Korea over its nuclear and ballistic tests. ... The U.N. has passed two resolutions recently aimed at squeezing the North Korean economy by cutting off oil, labor and exports to the nation." Meanwhile, the Guardian reports that South Korea's unification ministry is sending an $8m aid package aimed at infants and pregnant women in North Korea. The "humanitarian gesture [is] at odds with calls by Japan and the US for unwavering economic and diplomatic pressure on Pyongyang."

FLOTUS to Speak at UN Luncheon
1 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.