Donald Trump’s Not Slowing Down: He’s Up Big in New Hampshire, and Close in Iowa

New NBC/Marist polls show that the mogul-candidate’s boomlet isn’t being quelled by controversy.

Donald Trump greets guests gathered for a rally on July 25, 2015 in Oskaloosa, Iowa.
National Journal
Emily Schultheis
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Emily Schultheis
July 26, 2015, 5:04 a.m.

Be­littling a long­time sen­at­or’s mil­it­ary ser­vice is usu­ally a good way to end a polit­ic­al cam­paign. In Don­ald Trump’s case, a set of polls re­leased Sunday morn­ing from NBC/Mar­ist sug­gest that it’s not stop­ping the busi­ness mogul’s rap­id rise in the GOP field.

In New Hamp­shire, Trump comes in first with 21 per­cent; his closest com­pet­it­or is Jeb Bush, who’s at 14 per­cent. Scott Walk­er comes in third with 12 per­cent, then John Kasich at 7 per­cent, Chris Christie and Ben Car­son at 6 per­cent, and Marco Ru­bio and Ted Cruz at 5 per­cent.

And in Iowa, where Trump made his now-in­fam­ous com­ments about Mc­Cain this month, the busi­ness mogul comes in a close second to Walk­er. Walk­er takes 19 per­cent in the poll, com­pared with Trump at 17 per­cent. They’re fol­lowed by Bush (12 per­cent), Car­son (8 per­cent), Hucka­bee (7 per­cent), and Rand Paul (5 per­cent).

The pair of polls were taken just as Trump was ques­tion­ing Mc­Cain’s war hero status at a GOP cattle-call event in Iowa. There, his sup­port ac­tu­ally rose (with­in the mar­gin-of-er­ror) after he made the com­ments: he was get­ting 16 per­cent in the in­ter­views con­duc­ted be­fore­hand, com­pared with 18 per­cent in the ones done after. (The com­ments do seem to have hurt him in New Hamp­shire, though not enough to take him out of first place: he was get­ting 26 per­cent in the in­ter­views be­fore his Mc­Cain com­ments, com­pared with 14 per­cent af­ter­ward.)

Na­tion­ally, too, Trump is on top: An­oth­er poll out Sunday, this one from CNN/ORC In­ter­na­tion­al, found him in first with 18 per­cent of the GOP primary vote. Bush is close be­hind at 15 per­cent, which is with­in the poll’s mar­gin of er­ror; the only oth­er can­did­ate to reach double di­gits in that poll is Walk­er. Asked if they want Trump to con­tin­ue his can­did­acy for pres­id­ent, 52 per­cent of po­ten­tial GOP primary voters said yes — and 22 per­cent of those sur­veyed think he’ll even­tu­ally win the nom­in­a­tion, second only to Bush.

Still, an obstacle for Trump is that his fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ings are fairly low with GOP voters in both states, es­pe­cially in New Hamp­shire, ac­cord­ing to the NBC/Mar­ist poll. There, 39 per­cent of GOP primary voters have a fa­vor­able view of him, com­pared with 53 per­cent who view him un­fa­vor­ably; in Iowa it’s slightly bet­ter, with 45 per­cent fa­vor­able, 44 per­cent un­fa­vor­able.

The poll also sur­veyed Demo­crat­ic primary voters, find­ing Hil­lary Clin­ton still on top in both states — but with Bernie Sanders gain­ing steam, es­pe­cially in New Hamp­shire. There, Clin­ton leads Sanders by just 13 points, 47 per­cent to 34 per­cent, with Mar­tin O’Mal­ley at 5 per­cent and Lin­coln Chafee at 2 per­cent. Back in the Feb­ru­ary NBC/Mar­ist poll, Clin­ton led Sanders in New Hamp­shire 69 per­cent to 13 per­cent.

In Iowa, Clin­ton’s lead is con­sid­er­ably big­ger. She took 55 per­cent of likely Demo­crat­ic caucus-go­ers in the poll, com­pared with 26 per­cent for Sanders, 4 per­cent for O’Mal­ley, and 2 per­cent for Jim Webb.

The worst news for Clin­ton might be her fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ing among all re­gistered voters in both states. In New Hamp­shire, it’s 19 points un­der­wa­ter (37 per­cent fa­vor­able, 56 per­cent un­fa­vor­able) and in Iowa it’s 20 points un­der­wa­ter (37 per­cent fa­vor­able, 57 per­cent un­fa­vor­able).

The polls sur­veyed 919 re­gistered voters in Iowa from Ju­ly 14-21 (mar­gin of er­ror +/- 3.2 per­cent­age points), in­clud­ing 342 po­ten­tial Re­pub­lic­an caucus-go­ers (+/-5.3 per­cent­age points) and 320 po­ten­tial Demo­crat­ic caucus-go­ers (+/- 5.5 per­cent­age points). In New Hamp­shire, the poll sur­veyed 910 re­gistered voters (+/- 3.2 per­cent­age points), in­clud­ing 401 po­ten­tial GOP primary voters (+/- 4.9 per­cent­age points) and 329 po­ten­tial Demo­crat­ic primary voters (+/- 5.4 per­cent­age points).

What We're Following See More »
McCain Won’t Support Graham-Cassidy Bill
5 hours ago

In a statement Friday, Sen. John McCain wrote, "I cannot in good conscience vote for the Graham-Cassidy proposal. I believe we could do better working together, Republicans and Democrats, and have not yet really tried. Nor could I support it without knowing how much it will cost, how it will effect insurance premiums, and how many people will be helped or hurt by it. Without a full CBO score, which won't be available by the end of the month, we won't have reliable answers to any of those questions." His "no" vote makes it much less likely Republicans will repeal and replace Obamacare by Sept. 30.

DeVos Officially Replaces Obama-era Sexual Assault Guidelines
6 hours ago

As anticipated, the Department of Education today withdrew the controversial Obama-era "Dear Colleague" letter on campus sexual assault, replacing it with new interim guidance. Most notably, the new guidance permits colleges to use a “clear and convincing” standard of evidence, rather than the preponderance of evidence standard that the 2011 letter seemed to mandate. "The new guidance also states that colleges may facilitate informal resolutions, including mediation, if all parties agree to participate in that process."

Country-Specific Rules to Replace Travel Ban
7 hours ago

"The Trump administration will unveil more tailored restrictions on travelers from certain countries as a replacement to the controversial travel ban, according to a senior administration official. The new restrictions will vary by country. They could include a ban on travel to the United States, or new restrictions on obtaining a visa for citizens of particular countries." They are expected to be unveiled by Sunday.

Facebook Enhances Disclosure for Political Ads
9 hours ago

In a live-streamed address from Silicon Valley, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced a nine-point plan that the tech giant is rolling out over coming months to respond to "efforts by nation-states and private actors to use the social media platform to influence U.S. elections." Most importantly, the company will force all advertisers to disclose what ads they're running to all audiences. “When someone buys political ads on TV or other media, they’re required by law to disclose who paid for them,” Zuckerberg said. “But you still don’t know if you’re seeing the same messages as everyone else. So we’re going to bring Facebook to an even higher standard of transparency. Not only will you have to disclose which page paid for an ad, but we will also make it so you can visit an advertiser’s page and see the ads they’re currently running to any audience on Facebook.”

Mandatory Training EPA Employees on Leaking
10 hours ago

As "part of a broader Trump administration order for anti-leaks training at all executive branch agencies," Environmental Protection Agency employees "are attending mandatory training sessions this week to reinforce their compliance with laws and rules against leaking classified or sensitive government information ... Relatively few EPA employees deal with classified files, but the new training also reinforces requirements to keep 'Controlled Unclassified Information' from unauthorized disclosure."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.