Here’s How Hillary Clinton Wants to Fight Global Warming

Her campaign announced new national goals for renewable energy deployment and vowed to protect President Obama’s carbon emissions rules.

AMES, IA - JULY 26: Democratic presidential hopeful and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks to guests gathered for a campaign event at Iowa State University on July 26, 2015 in Ames, Iowa. Although Clinton leads all other Democratic contenders, a recent poll had her trailing several of the Republican candidates in Iowa. 
National Journal
Ben Geman and Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman Clare Foran
July 26, 2015, 2:41 p.m.

Hil­lary Clin­ton began the closely watched rol­lout of her en­ergy-and-cli­mate plat­form Sunday even­ing by an­noun­cing goals that would greatly ex­pand the de­ploy­ment of re­new­able power in the com­ing years.

However, the an­nounce­ment does not ad­dress a suite of con­tro­ver­sial top­ics, in­clud­ing wheth­er Clin­ton sup­ports the Key­stone XL pipeline and wheth­er she would al­low oil drilling in Arc­tic wa­ters.

But the Clin­ton cam­paign em­phas­ized that Sunday’s pro­pos­al is just part of a broad­er cli­mate-and-en­ergy agenda that will un­fold in the com­ing months.

Clin­ton’s plan calls for more than half a bil­lion sol­ar pan­els in­stalled across the coun­try by the end of her first term, and hav­ing the U.S. gen­er­ate enough re­new­able en­ergy to power every home with­in a dec­ade of the start of a Clin­ton pres­id­ency.

Achiev­ing the goals would mean ex­pand­ing the amount of in­stalled sol­ar-en­ergy gen­er­at­ing ca­pa­city by 700 per­cent from cur­rent levels by the end of 2020, and adding more green-power gen­er­a­tion ca­pa­city to the elec­tric grid than any oth­er dec­ade in U.S. his­tory, ac­cord­ing to a sum­mary of the plan.

Ac­cord­ing to the Clin­ton cam­paign, the clean en­ergy agenda out­lined on Sunday would meet the test that en­vir­on­ment­al mega donor Tom Stey­er laid out last week when he called on all can­did­ates to put for­ward a plan to ramp up re­new­able and car­bon-free en­ergy so that it ac­counts for more than half of all power gen­er­a­tion by 2030.

Bri­an Fal­lon, a Clin­ton cam­paign spokes­man, said on Twit­ter: “Clin­ton’s goal trans­lates to 33% of elec­tri­city by 2027. Count­ing nuc­le­ar, as Stey­er does, she ex­ceeds his 50% goal.”

Stey­er was quick to praise Clin­ton while mak­ing clear that he hopes to see the 2016 Demo­crat­ic fron­trun­ner out­line ad­di­tion­al ac­tions she will take to fight glob­al warm­ing.

“Today, Hil­lary Clin­ton emerged as a strong lead­er in solv­ing the cli­mate crisis,” Stey­er said in a state­ment, adding: “we look for­ward to hear­ing more de­tails about her pro­pos­als to tackle cli­mate change.”

The cam­paign un­veiled the clean-en­ergy pledge by re­leas­ing a video and out­line of the plan Sunday even­ing.

“Fu­ture gen­er­a­tions will look back and won­der: What were we think­ing? How could we pos­sibly be so ir­re­spons­ible?” Clin­ton’s voice in­tones dur­ing the video. “I’m just a grand­moth­er with two eyes and a brain, and I know what’s hap­pen­ing in the world is go­ing to have a big ef­fect on my daugh­ter and es­pe­cially on my grand­daugh­ter.”

“You don’t have to be a sci­ent­ist to take on this ur­gent chal­lenge that threatens us all; you just have to be will­ing to act,” Clin­ton adds.

Sunday’s rol­lout is a pivotal polit­ic­al mo­ment in Clin­ton’s re­la­tion­ship to en­vir­on­ment­al­ists, in­clud­ing the more-pro­gress­ive wing of the move­ment that has ques­tioned her green bona fides.

Some en­vir­on­ment­al­ists are du­bi­ous about Clin­ton’s com­mit­ment to power­fully con­front­ing glob­al warm­ing and fossil fuels. The more lefty and ag­gress­ive sec­tors of the green move­ment, such as Ver­mont act­iv­ist Bill McK­ib­ben, note her lack of a Key­stone po­s­i­tion.

And Clin­ton has ap­plauded the eco­nom­ic be­ne­fits of the na­tion’s frack­ing-fueled oil and nat­ur­al-gas boom, and the lower car­bon emis­sions of gas com­pared to coal, while call­ing for “smart” reg­u­la­tions.

The sum­mary of her plan does not touch on where she may seek to al­low or bar de­vel­op­ment, prom­ising only fu­ture in­form­a­tion on the top­ic.

There will be a ma­jor ini­ti­at­ive, the cam­paign said, on ways to “en­sure that fossil fuel pro­duc­tion tak­ing place today is safe and re­spons­ible, that tax­pay­ers get a fair deal for de­vel­op­ment on pub­lic lands, and that areas that are too sens­it­ive for en­ergy pro­duc­tion are taken off the table.”

Steps to achieve the re­new­able power goals an­nounced on Sunday in­clude pro­tect­ing the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s car­bon-emis­sions stand­ards for power plants, ac­cord­ing to the Clin­ton cam­paign, as well as new ini­ti­at­ives. That means, a “new part­ner­ship with states, cit­ies, and rur­al com­munit­ies that are ready to lead on clean en­ergy.” This work would in­clude grants and “mar­ket-based” in­cent­ives to help states cut car­bon bey­ond the stand­ards Obama is im­pos­ing and ac­cel­er­ate green-en­ergy de­ploy­ment.

The cam­paign says Clin­ton, if elec­ted, would pur­sue a wide-ran­ging set of ini­ti­at­ives to ex­pand de­ploy­ment of re­new­able en­ergy, such as re­mov­ing bar­ri­ers to trans­mis­sion and fight­ing to ex­tend green en­ergy tax cred­its on Cap­it­ol Hill, and ex­pand­ing re­new­ables de­vel­op­ment on fed­er­al lands and build­ings, among oth­er steps.

Clin­ton’s cam­paign chair­man, John Podesta, has vowed that Clin­ton would make cli­mate change and clean en­ergy ma­jor themes of her race for the White House.

Sub­sequent an­nounce­ments will ad­dress is­sues such as re­du­cing oil con­sump­tion in the U.S. and around the world, guard­ing against sup­ply dis­rup­tions, and mod­ern­iz­ing en­ergy in­fra­struc­ture, the cam­paign said.

On the heels of Sunday night’s an­nounce­ment, Clin­ton will tour and give a speech on en­ergy and cli­mate Monday at the Des Moines Area Re­gion­al Trans­it Cent­ral Sta­tion, which has a “plat­in­um” cer­ti­fic­a­tion in the U.S. Green Build­ing Coun­cil’s rat­ing sys­tem.

Two oth­er con­tenders for the Demo­crat­ic nod are ap­peal­ing to pro­gress­ive voters with ag­gress­ive cli­mate pro­pos­als and re­cords of their own.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, who has been gain­ing in the polls and at­tract­ing large crowds, has sponsored le­gis­la­tion to im­pose a tax on car­bon emis­sions.

Sanders also is a long­time op­pon­ent of the Key­stone XL pipeline and has en­dorsed the move­ment among some uni­versit­ies, churches, found­a­tions, and oth­er in­sti­tu­tion­al in­vestors to dump their hold­ings in coal and oil-and-gas com­pan­ies.

Former Mary­land Gov. Mar­tin O’Mal­ley, an­oth­er Key­stone foe, un­veiled a broad plan in June. It pro­poses a man­date to re­quire that all of the na­tion’s elec­tri­city come from re­new­able sources by 2050, while ex­pand­ing EPA’s car­bon emis­sions rules for power plants to cov­er oth­er large pol­lu­tion sources and re­ject­ing any ex­pan­sion of off­shore drilling, among oth­er meas­ures.

O’Mal­ley, saddled with very low polling num­bers, sought to pro­mote his plan ahead of Clin­ton’s an­nounce­ment Sunday.

“Es­chew­ing the piece­meal, poll-tested, ‘all of the above’ en­ergy strategies of the past, O’Mal­ley has made clear that he will use the full force of his ex­ec­ut­ive power to make the trans­ition to a clean en­ergy fu­ture the Num­ber 1 pri­or­ity of our fed­er­al gov­ern­ment,” his cam­paign said.

Clin­ton, in her Sen­ate ca­reer be­fore be­com­ing sec­ret­ary of State, drew high marks from the League of Con­ser­va­tion Voters, which care­fully tracks law­makers’ votes on a suite of en­vir­on­ment­al and en­ergy mat­ters.

She scored an 82 per­cent re­cord for her ca­reer, though her num­bers were dragged down some­what by miss­ing a num­ber of votes while run­ning for pres­id­ent eight years ago.

This post has been up­dated with ad­di­tion­al in­form­a­tion.

What We're Following See More »
North Korea Threatens H-Bomb Test Over Pacific
2 days ago

"North Korea said on Friday it might test a hydrogen bomb over the Pacific Ocean after President Donald Trump vowed to destroy the reclusive country, with leader Kim Jong Un promising to make Trump pay dearly for his threats. Kim did not specify what action he would take against the United States or Trump, whom he called a 'mentally deranged U.S. dotard' in the latest bout of insults the two leaders have traded in recent weeks."

Trump Makes Good on Promise of New North Korea Sanctions
3 days ago

President Trump this afternoon announced another round of sanctions on North Korea, calling the regime "a continuing threat." The executive order, which Trump relayed to Congress, bans any ship or plane that has visited North Korea from visiting the United States within 180 days. The order also authorizes sanctions on any financial institution doing business with North Korea, and permits the secretaries of State and the Treasury to sanction any person involved in trading with North Korea, operating a port there, or involved in a variety of industries there.

Trump Promises More Sanctions on North Korea
3 days ago

In response to a reporter's question, President Trump said "he’ll be looking to impose further financial penalties on North Korea over its nuclear and ballistic tests. ... The U.N. has passed two resolutions recently aimed at squeezing the North Korean economy by cutting off oil, labor and exports to the nation." Meanwhile, the Guardian reports that South Korea's unification ministry is sending an $8m aid package aimed at infants and pregnant women in North Korea. The "humanitarian gesture [is] at odds with calls by Japan and the US for unwavering economic and diplomatic pressure on Pyongyang."

FLOTUS to Speak at UN Luncheon
4 days ago
Trump Meets with UN Leaders
4 days ago

President Trump on Tuesday night met with UN Secretary Guterres and President of the General Assembly Miroslav Lajcak. In both cases, as per releases from the White House, Trump pressed them on the need to reform the UN bureaucracy.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.