House Republicans: No Agreement on Crude Oil Exports

Picture released, 12 December 2007 by the Norwegian Coastal Administration showing an aerial photo of the tanker Navion Britannia which was loading oil from a loading buoy and left a major oilspill in Statfjord, some 200 kilometers (125 miles) from the Norwegian coast. According to preliminary estimates from the Petroleum Safety Authority, some 3,840 cubic metres, the equivalent of 24,150 barrels or 3,220 tonnes of oil, had spilled into the sea.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
Feb. 6, 2014, 5:04 a.m.

A few weeks ago Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Amy Harder wrote about House Re­pub­lic­ans’ polit­ic­al cagi­ness over wheth­er the na­tion’s crude oil ex­port ban should be lif­ted. Today two House Re­pub­lic­ans made it clear their con­fer­ence hasn’t got­ten much closer to a con­sensus on the top­ic.

“I don’t think there is a sol­id Re­pub­lic­an po­s­i­tion on this right now,” said Rep. John Shimkus, a mem­ber of the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee. His com­mit­tee col­league Joe Bar­ton, ap­pear­ing at the same Politico-hos­ted event Thursday, said, “I can de­bate either side of that.”

“From a pure eco­nom­ic stand­point, it doesn’t make sense to have an ex­port ban; let’s elim­in­ate it, and if you are a mar­ket-based per­son, do that,” said Bar­ton, a Texas Re­pub­lic­an and former chair­man of the En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee.

“On the oth­er hand, from more of a prag­mat­ic, polit­ic­al [stand­point], a lot of the en­vir­on­ment­al­ists are go­ing to fight us tooth and nail if we try and end the ban. Is it really worth hav­ing that fight?” he asked.

Bar­ton chairs the en­ergy task force of the con­ser­vat­ive Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee and said the ex­port de­bate is alive with­in the group.

“We are go­ing to put out a series of po­s­i­tion pa­pers and also some bills, maybe a com­pre­hens­ive bill, and … one of the things that we are de­bat­ing is wheth­er to sup­port the end of the ban,” Bar­ton said.

Shimkus de­scribed ar­gu­ments on both sides.

One is flatly pro-free-trade on com­mod­it­ies. But he also made the case for ex­pand­ing re­finery ca­pa­city — and the jobs that come with it — so the U.S. could ex­port even more re­fined products rather than ship­ping crude abroad.

“That is what we would rather see, be­cause I think it is more be­ne­fi­cial to the wealth of our na­tion,” Shimkus said.

En­ergy and Power Sub­com­mit­tee Chair­man Ed Whit­field, R-Ky., said earli­er this week that while his pan­el’s fo­cus is on ex­ports of nat­ur­al-gas right now, oil ex­ports are on the ho­ri­zon.

“I do think the ex­port of crude oil will be an is­sue that is go­ing to be more and more dis­cussed and we’re go­ing to be fo­cused on,” he said.

“Philo­soph­ic­ally, I don’t really have a prob­lem of ex­port­ing crude oil per se,” Whit­field said Tues­day when his com­mit­tee re­leased a pa­per ar­guing that ex­port­ing gas would provide geo­pol­it­ic­al and eco­nom­ic be­ne­fits. “We’re already ex­port­ing crude-oil products any­way.” He ad­ded, though, that it can get com­plic­ated when you con­sider wheth­er gas­ol­ine prices may rise.

He in­dic­ated that when the com­mit­tee does fo­cus on it, le­gis­la­tion to change the status quo is un­likely. “When the time comes, we just want a pub­lic de­bate about it,” Whit­field said.

Amy Harder contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
MAY BRING CONSERVATIVES ON BOARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT MODERATES?
House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
11 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

AT LEAST 30 TO BE ASSESSED
Trump to Order Review of National Monuments
12 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.

Source:
EMERGING BUDGET FRAMEWORK?
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
15 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Source:
WHITE HOUSE BLOCKING DOC REQUEST
Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
16 hours ago
BREAKING

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

Source:
SENATE JUDICIARY HEARING
Sally Yates to Testify on May 8
21 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login