Clock Ticking on Cybersecurity Bill

Rand Paul floats amendments to audit the Federal Reserve, allow members of the armed forces to carry weapons on military installations.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell talks with reporters after the weekly Senate Republican policy luncheon on August 4, 2015.
National Journal
Aug. 4, 2015, 1 p.m.

Senators are negotiating a deal to add amendments to the cyberinformation-sharing bill under consideration in exchange for unanimous consent to move the bill forward.

A deal would tee up the Cyber Information-Sharing Act, which provides incentives to the private sector for sharing cyberthreat information with the government. The bill’s supporters in Congress and the private sector say information-sharing would help companies and the government ward off cyberattacks.

Senators from both parties have called for amendments that increase security and privacy protections to be added to the bill before a vote. A deal would allow senators to address their concerns within the tight timeline before next week’s recess.

But such an agreement hasn’t yet materialized.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made an initial proposal on the Senate floor Tuesday, asking for unanimous consent to move forward if 10 amendments from each party were made pending. “That’s a good and fair start that exceeds the request from our friends across the aisle,” he said.

But Minority Leader Harry Reid immediately objected and criticized the offer, which did not go so far as to allow votes on the amendments to be scheduled. “I can’t imagine how he can make this offer with a straight face,” Reid said of McConnell. “Amendments pending? That’s like nothing. We tried that before, as recently as the highway bill. Having amendments pending doesn’t mean anything.”

Senators are still negotiating a deal that would guarantee the votes. “We could start working on these amendments right now if we can have votes on them,” Reid said Tuesday.

Meanwhile, senators from both sides are throwing possible amendments onto the pile.

Sen. Rand Paul, a top privacy advocate in the Senate, floated nine privacy-focused amendments to the bill Monday, as well three non-cybersecurity related provisions. One of those is his effort to allow a government audit of the Federal Reserve, a campaign he inherited from his father, Ron Paul, and has maintained for years. Another of the Kentucky Republican’s measures cracks down on undocumented immigrants, and yet another would allow members of the armed forces to carry weapons onto military installations.

Another privacy advocate, Sen. Ron Wyden, said on the Senate floor Tuesday that the bill is “going to need some very substantial amendments.” He has put forward an amendment that would ban the government from requiring device manufacturers and software developers build “backdoors” that allow law enforcement access to encrypted data.

Other senators looking to make changes include Democratic Sen. Mark Warner and Republican Sen. Ron Johnson. Johnson said Monday that he hoped an amendment he put forward, which would speed the deployment of a Homeland Security Department cyberdefense system to federal agencies, made it onto the bill.

As senators try to work out an agreement to move the bill forward before recess, Sen. John McCain took the floor to lash out at Democrats for blocking McConnell’s proposal. “It is unbelievable that this body would not move forward with a cyber bill with a situation of dire consequences and dire threats to the United States of America,” the Arizona Republican said.

“This is disgraceful, and I tell my colleagues on the other side of the aisle: By blocking this legislation, you’re putting this nation in danger,” McCain continued. “This is a shameful day in the United States Senate.”

Reid, for his part, blamed Republicans for using a vote to defund Planned Parenthood earlier this week to drag out consideration of CISA. “It appears to me this is just stall and stall and stall, so McConnell can go out and say, ‘See, they killed cyber.’ “

McConnell filed for cloture on CISA on Monday night, so a cloture vote could occur as early as Wednesday morning. At that point, senators would have 30 hours to debate the measure before putting it to a vote, a timeline that would overflow into the weekend.

Since senators have repeatedly indicated that they would not stay past Friday, they must either reach an agreement to vote earlier or try to address the issue when the return in September, when they will also be debating the Iran nuclear deal and dealing with fights over appropriations.

Jason Plautz contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
Kelly Craft Nominated for UN Post
4 hours ago
Trump Blocks Federal Funding to Groups that Make Abortion Referrals
8 hours ago

"The Trump administration took aim at Planned Parenthood Friday, issuing a rule barring groups that provide abortions or abortion referrals from participating in the $286 million federal family planning program — a move that is expected to direct millions toward faith-based providers."

House Expects Tuesday Vote to End National Emergency
11 hours ago

"The House plans to vote Tuesday on legislation to formally block President Donald Trump’s attempt to circumvent Congress to fund his border wall, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Friday. The privileged resolution to stop Trump’s emergency declaration — which has 226 co-sponsors, including one Republican — is expected to easily pass the House. It then will be voted in the Senate within 18 days."

Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.