Congress’s Medicare Deal Isn’t a Deal at All

Democrats and Republicans are touting a permanent “doc fix,” but they’ve yet to reach agreement on the hardest part: how to pay for it.

The opening session of the 113th Congress. (Rick Bloom)
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Add to Briefcase
Clara Ritger
Feb. 6, 2014, 7:51 a.m.

Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans are tout­ing a com­prom­ise that would re­peal a flawed for­mula that de­term­ines Medi­care phys­i­cian pay­ments, but for now it’s a deal in name only.

Law­makers in both cham­bers are plan­ning to in­tro­duce bi­par­tis­an le­gis­la­tion Thursday to re­peal Medi­care’s Sus­tain­able Growth Rate for­mula, a phys­i­cian pay­ment plan Con­gress passed in 1997 in the hopes of lim­it­ing spend­ing on the massive so­cial pro­gram. Since 2003, however, Con­gress has passed short-term patches to stop the cuts, a mad­den­ing an­nu­al tra­di­tion known as the “doc fix” that has come at a cost of roughly $150 bil­lion.

In an ef­fort to end the an­nu­al ex­er­cise, the bills law­makers are re­leas­ing Thursday would re­peal the SGR for­mula and would in­sti­tute five years of an­nu­al up­dates of 0.5 per­cent to Medi­care phys­i­cians’ pay.

But des­pite the bills’ bi­par­tis­an back­ing, law­makers have yet to agree on the thorn­i­est is­sue of the doc fix: how to pay for it.

Neither bill in­cludes meas­ures to off­set the spend­ing — a hole that could sink it among the Hill’s budget hawks. And as Con­gress de­bates where to cut or where to get new rev­en­ue to off­set the spend­ing, the deal’s bi­par­tis­an sup­port could splinter.

The Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice is slated to do a cost es­tim­ate of the meas­ures Thursday af­ter­noon, be­fore they are form­ally un­veiled.

If it were to pass, the com­prom­ise le­gis­la­tion as cur­rently writ­ten would cre­ate a pro­gram and qual­ity meas­ures to eval­u­ate per­form­ance and re­ward pro­viders who im­prove health out­comes, and it adds in­cent­ives for care co­ordin­a­tion for pa­tients with chron­ic con­di­tions. Ad­di­tion­ally, it cre­ates a Phys­i­cian Com­pare web­site that Medi­care be­ne­fi­ciar­ies can use to make de­cisions about pro­viders, as well as to al­low out­side re­view­ers to eval­u­ate qual­ity of care.

This year’s round of phys­i­cian re­im­burse­ment cuts is set to take ef­fect in March, un­less Con­gress acts.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
4 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
6 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
6 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login