Republican Debate Turns Spectacle and Leaves Trump on Top

The prime-time event produces fireworks and some surprises as second-tier candidates find ways to break through.

Republican presidential candidates Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Donald Trump participate in the first prime-time presidential debate hosted by FOX News and Facebook at the Quicken Loans Arena August 6, 2015 in Cleveland, Ohio. 
National Journal
Tim Alberta and Shane Goldmacher
Add to Briefcase
Tim Alberta and Shane Goldmacher
Aug. 6, 2015, 8:17 p.m.

CLEVELAND — Donald Trump dominated the night, but the first prime-time Republican presidential debate of 2016 provided ample space for other contenders to make a mark on an uncomfortably crowded stage.

In fact, the first 90 seconds of Thursday’s explosive main event were more entertaining than all 90 minutes of the earlier B-list debate that featured seven candidates who failed to qualify for the night-time show.

All eyes were on Trump coming in, and anyone who thought the real-estate mogul would take a softer tone on the debate stage than he has on the campaign trail was quickly disappointed. “We don’t have time for tone,” Trump said at one point. “We have to go out and get the job done.”

After saying he might yet run as an independent — drawing boos from the audience and provoking an attack from Rand Paul — Trump was at the center of several surreal exchanges, including one in which moderator Megyn Kelly asked him about a history of misogynistic attacks on women.

(RELATED: Trump Voters: Is This Really What You Want?)

“You’ve called women you don’t like ‘fat pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals,’” Kelly began. Trump interrupted: “Only Rosie O’Donnell.”

Several thousand spectators inside Quicken Loans Arena roared as he dismissed her, and it was clear, less than 10 minutes into the event, that all rules and decorum governing typical presidential debates would not apply.

Other winners emerged: John Kasich capitalizing on the hometown crowd, Chris Christie emerging as a force on the big stage, and the three candidates perceived by many to be the likeliest eventual nominees — Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and Scott Walker — staying on message and ignoring the mayhem unfolding around them.

But the night was about Trump.

(RELATED: How Donald Trump’s Debate Performance Played for the Red State Crowd)

There was no shortage of opportunities to attack him, and the Fox News moderators — Kelly, Bret Baier, and Chris Wallace — seemed intent on provoking such altercations. At one point, after Kasich refused to criticize Trump’s comments about the Mexican border, Wallace said he hoped to “do better” with Rubio and teed up the same question for the Florida senator.

They pushed Trump and Bush to tangle directly when Bush declared, “Mr. Trump’s language is divisive.”

“I want to win,” Bush said. “We’re going to win when we unite people with a hopeful optimistic message.”

Even when he wasn’t attacking or being attacked, Trump, with his relaxed demeanor and from-the-hip style, produced many of the debate’s most memorable moments.

When he was quizzed repeatedly on his past support of Democratic causes and politicians, Trump explained nonchalantly that he was essentially manipulating politicians to do what he wanted. He also defended his past giving to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi. Asked what he got for his money, Trump said, “With Hillary Clinton, I said, ‘Be at my wedding,’ and she came to my wedding.”

(RELATED: Winners: Trump, Kasich, Rubio. Losers: Bush, Carson, Cruz.)

Trump explained his past support for a single-payer health care system by saying, “It works in Canada.”

Paul tried to jump on Trump for that remark, but he was cut off. “I don’t think you heard me,” Trump retorted. “You’re having a hard time tonight.”

The most heated exchange of the night, however, did not include Trump. It came when Paul and Christie went head-to-head on the tension between civil liberties and national security. It was clear that both men, who were perched at the stage’s edges after fading from the top tier in the polls, relished the chance to do battle on the big stage.

“I want to collect more records from terrorists, but less records from innocent Americans,” Paul declared.

“That’s a completely ridiculous answer,” Christie jumped in. “How are you supposed to know?”

“Use the Fourth Amendment! Use the Fourth Amendment!” Paul shouted, as they spoke over one another. “Get a warrant!”

Then Christie unleashed one of the night’s most memorable lines: “Listen, Senator, you know, when you’re sitting in a subcommittee, just blowing hot air about this, you can say things like that.”

Indeed, Paul often found himself outnumbered in policy disputes. But he consistently asserted his voice on stage — which is more than could be said for Huckabee or Ben Carson, both of whom disappeared for long stretches of the debate and did not enjoy any memorable moments. When Carson got only his second question, nearly 45 minutes into the debate, he joked, “Thank you Megyn, I wasn’t sure I was going to get to talk again.”

Cruz, the much-touted collegiate champion debater, was similarly absent, scoring few notable blows for his anti-Washington message.

Bush and Rubio were confident and detailed in their responses. One of Bush’s better moments was a response to questioning about his support for Common Core, and he earned sustained applause when arguing for high standards.

At one point, Wallace pitted them against each other, asking Rubio whether he could make a better president than Bush despite no executive experience.

Rubio deflected and launched one of the sharpest attacks on Clinton. “This election cannot be a résumé competition. It’s important to be qualified, but if this election is a résumé competition, then Hillary Clinton’s gonna be the next president, because she’s been in office and in government longer than anybody else running here tonight,” he said.

Rubio repeated his thematic line about 2016 being “about the future,” then added: “If I’m our nominee, how is Hillary Clinton gonna lecture me about living paycheck to paycheck? I was raised paycheck to paycheck. How is she — how is she gonna lecture me — how is she gonna lecture me about student loans? I owed over $100,000 just four years ago.”

Another big winner Thursday night was Kasich, who was greeted with a thunderous standing ovation at the beginning of the debate and enjoyed what Wallace called “a home-field advantage” throughout. Kasich on several occasions appeared to be shadowing Bush, touting reforms made in Ohio that elevated people from poverty. Kasich also dealt effectively with a tough question on opposing gay marriage by declaring he’d recently attended a gay wedding and would support his children if they are gay, earning enthusiastic cheers from the hometown audience.

But in many ways, the night ultimately belonged to Trump. Despite some early provocations and statements that drew scattered boos, the billionaire businessman did not commit any serious errors. He was forceful with his answers and was consistently rewarded by the crowd for his spontaneous one-liners attacking Washington and career politicians. He even received some validation from his rival candidates.

“Here is the thing about Donald Trump. Donald Trump is hitting a nerve in this country,” Kasich said. “People are frustrated. They’re fed up. They don’t think the government is working for them. And for people who want to just tune him out, they’re making a mistake.”

What We're Following See More »
SAYS HIS DEATH STEMMED FROM A FISTFIGHT
Saudis Admit Khashoggi Killed in Embassy
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Saudi Arabia said Saturday that Jamal Khashoggi, the dissident Saudi journalist who disappeared more than two weeks ago, had died after an argument and fistfight with unidentified men inside the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul. Eighteen men have been arrested and are being investigated in the case, Saudi state-run media reported without identifying any of them. State media also reported that Maj. Gen. Ahmed al-Assiri, the deputy director of Saudi intelligence, and other high-ranking intelligence officials had been dismissed."

Source:
ROGER STONE IN THE CROSSHAIRS?
Mueller Looking into Ties Between WikiLeaks, Conservative Groups
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation is scrutinizing how a collection of activists and pundits intersected with WikiLeaks, the website that U.S. officials say was the primary conduit for publishing materials stolen by Russia, according to people familiar with the matter. Mr. Mueller’s team has recently questioned witnesses about the activities of longtime Trump confidante Roger Stone, including his contacts with WikiLeaks, and has obtained telephone records, according to the people familiar with the matter."

Source:
PROBING COLLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION
Mueller To Release Key Findings After Midterms
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Special Counsel Robert Mueller is expected to issue findings on core aspects of his Russia probe soon after the November midterm elections ... Specifically, Mueller is close to rendering judgment on two of the most explosive aspects of his inquiry: whether there were clear incidents of collusion between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, and whether the president took any actions that constitute obstruction of justice." Mueller has faced pressure to wrap up the investigation from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, said an official, who would receive the results of the investigation and have "some discretion in deciding what is relayed to Congress and what is publicly released," if he remains at his post.

Source:
PASSED ON SO-CALLED "SAR" REPORTS
FinCen Official Charged with Leaking Info on Manafort, Gates
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS
"A senior official working for the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has been charged with leaking confidential financial reports on former Trump campaign advisers Paul Manafort, Richard Gates and others to a media outlet. Prosecutors say that Natalie Mayflower Sours Edwards, a senior adviser to FinCEN, photographed what are called suspicious activity reports, or SARs, and other sensitive government files and sent them to an unnamed reporter, in violation of U.S. law."
Source:
FIRST CHARGE FOR MIDTERMS
DOJ Charges Russian For Meddling In 2018 Midterms
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Justice Department on Friday charged a Russian woman for her alleged role in a conspiracy to interfere with the 2018 U.S. election, marking the first criminal case prosecutors have brought against a foreign national for interfering in the upcoming midterms. Elena Khusyaynova, 44, was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States. Prosecutors said she managed the finances of 'Project Lakhta,' a foreign influence operation they said was designed 'to sow discord in the U.S. political system' by pushing arguments and misinformation online about a host of divisive political issues, including immigration, the Confederate flag, gun control and the National Football League national-anthem protests."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login