Where Electric Cars Will Drive Around In Poor Neighborhoods

An electric-vehicle program in Los Angeles would provide access and savings to those who need it most.

FREMONT, CA - Tesla's luxury electric vehicle brand is typically out of reach for low-income communities. 
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Sarah Goodyear, City Lab
Aug. 10, 2015, 4:08 a.m.

For all their so­cial be­ne­fits, elec­tric vehicles have so far re­mained the province of the rich. Snazzy Teslas start at $70,000, BMW’s i3 will set you back $43,000, and even the re­l­at­ively cheap Ford Fo­cus Elec­tric and Nis­san Leaf cost around $30,000.

That’s nowhere near eco­nomy-car prices, and giv­en how new the fleet is, it will take a few years to build up a used-EV mar­ket.

That means low-in­come fam­il­ies, who tend to live in the parts of cit­ies more vul­ner­able to pol­lu­tion, can’t al­ways ac­cess the tre­mend­ous ad­vances in clean-trans­port­a­tion tech­no­logy.

Los Angeles wants to level the play­ing field with a new pi­lot pro­gram to sub­sid­ize EV car-shar­ing. The city just won a $1.6 mil­lion grant from the Cali­for­nia Air Re­sources Board (CARB) to put 100 car-share vehicles, at least 80 of which are elec­tric, in­to the low-in­come neigh­bor­hoods ringing down­town L.A. The city still needs to fig­ure out who will op­er­ate the ser­vice, but it hopes to get the new cars rolling by early next year.

The pro­ject ad­dresses both eco­nom­ic and en­vir­on­ment­al sus­tain­ab­il­ity.

Low-in­come fam­il­ies spend a high­er share of their paychecks on trans­port­a­tion than wealth­i­er fam­il­ies, but have less ac­cess to car-shar­ing ser­vices, be­cause they aren’t close enough or the cost of mem­ber­ship is still too high. Poor neigh­bor­hoods of­ten suf­fer worse air pol­lu­tion, but the eco­nom­ic bar­ri­ers make it hard to ditch old cars in fa­vor of clean­er elec­tric ones.

The col­lab­or­at­ive ef­fort came to­geth­er with help from the Chica­go-based Shared-Use Mo­bil­ity Cen­ter, a non­profit that wants to make it pos­sible “to live well without own­ing a car,” in the words of ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or Shar­on Fei­gon. She’s got over a dec­ade of ex­per­i­ence set­ting up and run­ning car-share ser­vices in cit­ies around the coun­try. She likens es­tab­lish­ing af­ford­able car-share in a dis­ad­vant­aged neigh­bor­hood to open­ing a gro­cery store in a food desert: It taps in­to un­der­served de­mand.

“Our ex­per­i­ence is do­ing something like this can work really well,” she says. “Take really good elec­tric cars and make them af­ford­able and ac­cess­ible to people who don’t have a lot of money for trans­port­a­tion — of course that can work.”

L.A. is known as a driv­ing city, but pub­lic trans­it has drastic­ally ex­pan­ded there in re­cent years. That same trans­it ex­pan­sion has had the un­for­tu­nate ef­fect of push­ing low-in­come res­id­ents out of the im­proved areas as prop­erty val­ues rise, says com­munity or­gan­izer Sandra McNeill. As ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of T.R.U.S.T South L.A., she works to sta­bil­ize hous­ing and trans­port­a­tion for the com­munit­ies get­ting dis­placed by new de­vel­op­ment. She sup­ports car-shar­ing as a way to keep down costs of liv­ing so low-in­come res­id­ents avoid be­ing dis­placed.

“If they can then de­fer pur­chase of a vehicle or sell off a vehicle, there can be tre­mend­ous sav­ings that can help sta­bil­ize a fam­ily,” McNeill says.

Some of the cars will go in­to South L.A., where McNeill works. It’s a part of town where al­most every­body rents — around 85 per­cent, she says. A fam­ily of four there earns $25,000 a year, half the city’s me­di­an in­come. The car-share pro­gram will also fo­cus on West­lake, Pico-Uni­on, Boyle Heights, and Koreatown, areas home to large num­bers of new im­mig­rants. Many people in these neigh­bor­hoods work in gar­ments, res­taur­ants, or con­struc­tion, all areas highly vul­ner­able to wage theft and sub-min­im­um wage com­pens­a­tion. Healthy food and park space are lim­ited, but rates of asthma and can­cer are ex­tremely high.

The EV car-share pro­gram will go in­to low-in­come neigh­bor­hoods around down­town L.A., where al­most every­one rents and works low-wage jobs. (City of L.A. Sus­tain­ab­il­ity Team)

Those chal­lenges made the neigh­bor­hoods ideal can­did­ates for CARB’s grant fund­ing, com­posed of rev­en­ue from large-scale emit­ters buy­ing car­bon al­low­ances from the state. Cali­for­nia Sen­ate Pres­id­ent Pro Tem­pore Kev­in de León, who rep­res­ents L.A., au­thored a bill that des­ig­nates cap-and-trade funds for neigh­bor­hoods dis­pro­por­tion­ately harmed by cli­mate change and poor en­vir­on­ment­al qual­ity. In a speech on Ju­ly 24, de León praised policies that “demo­crat­ize” cli­mate-change pro­gress; “all in­di­vidu­als de­serve ac­cess to elec­tric­al vehicles,” he said.

Com­munity groups such as T.R.U.S.T. South L.A. will play a key role in shap­ing the on-the-ground de­tails of the car-shar­ing setup, says McNeill, be­cause loc­al know­ledge will be vi­tal to the pro­gram’s suc­cess. Un­like wealth­i­er neigh­bor­hoods where car-shar­ing already thrives, the new pro­gram op­er­at­or can’t as­sume that every­one in the tar­get area has a bank ac­count, or a cell phone, or an in­ter­net con­nec­tion.

That’s quite a de­par­ture from the typ­ic­al car-share sys­tem, where users sign up on­line and loc­ate and book cars on their phones. The pro­gram might need to in­clude a call cen­ter to help people re­serve cars, for in­stance, but op­er­at­ors there had bet­ter speak more lan­guages than Eng­lish.

That grass­roots par­ti­cip­a­tion also can be at­tract­ive to car-share com­pan­ies be­cause it helps them ease in­to a new mar­ket, says Fei­gon. “Part of what I think makes it in­ter­est­ing to the op­er­at­ors is that these com­munity groups will be in­volved, so they’ll have sup­port,” she says. “From the com­pany’s point of view, it’s all about util­iz­a­tion: if the cars are used in the right num­bers, then it works for these com­pan­ies.”

Cali­for­nia has set am­bi­tious green­house gas re­duc­tion goals — like put­ting 1.5 mil­lion EVs on the road by 2025 — and achiev­ing that re­quires mass par­ti­cip­a­tion, says CARB spokes­per­son Dav­id Clegern. “We need the help of every­one and we don’t want to leave any­one out of the be­ne­fits of this pro­gram,” he says. “[This pi­lot] gets the tech­no­logy out there to an audi­ence that might not or­din­ar­ily be ex­posed to it.”

The L.A. city coun­cil still needs to form­ally ac­cept the grant when it comes back from its sum­mer re­cess, says L.A. Chief Sus­tain­ab­il­ity Of­ficer Matt Petersen. Then they can put out a call for pro­pos­als to de­cide who will op­er­ate the car-share. He hopes to have cars op­er­at­ing by early 2016 if not soon­er. The city is also work­ing on in­stalling 1,000 pub­lic EV char­ging sta­tions by 2017, and this pi­lot will add 110 of them.

By tack­ling sev­er­al prob­lems at once, this pi­lot stands to be­ne­fit low-in­come neigh­bor­hoods in sev­er­al dif­fer­ent ways. First, there is the re­duc­tion in car-own­er­ship. A good ra­tio for car-share util­iz­a­tion is 70 users to one car, says Fei­gon. That means the pi­lot’s 100 cars can sup­port 7,000 drivers. That’s 7,000 people who can for­get about car leases, gas spikes, in­sur­ance pay­ments, and the myri­ad oth­er ex­penses that come with car own­er­ship. That’s a good chunk of change go­ing back in­to house­holds that need it most.

Those cost sav­ings have proven at­tract­ive throughout the coun­try. Data from SUMC show the num­ber of car-share vehicles in the U.S. has grown con­sist­ently over the last dec­ade (be­low). L.A. has the 11th-most car-shar­ing vehicles; New York, San Fran­cisco, and Wash­ing­ton lead the pack.

L.A.’s in­vest­ment in car-share joins a na­tion­wide trend of car-share ex­pan­sion over the last dec­ade. (Shared-Use Mo­bil­ity Cen­ter / TS­RC / UC-Berke­ley)

Then there are the en­vir­on­ment­al be­ne­fits. The smoggy, pol­luted neigh­bor­hoods will be able to cut out ex­haust for those pro­jec­ted 7,000 drivers. The city es­tim­ates this can avoid the pur­chase of 1,000 gas-powered cars, elim­in­at­ing 2,150 tons of CO2 emis­sions an­nu­ally. If the pi­lot suc­ceeds, the city will ex­pand the ser­vice, in­creas­ing the car­bon sav­ings.

Most im­port­antly, this strategy re­cog­nizes the cru­cial eco­nom­ic di­men­sions of en­vir­on­ment­al justice. Too of­ten, the shiny new green solu­tions that get writ­ten up and pro­moted cost too much to be ac­cess­ible to low-in­come con­sumers. Middle- and up­per-class en­vir­on­ment­al­ists have every right to pay above-mar­ket rates for more sus­tain­ably farmed kale or de­sign­er zero-car­bon homes, but if sus­tain­able con­sump­tion re­mains strat­i­fied with in­come, its be­ne­fits will be lim­ited.

Green tech­no­logy prices tend to drop with time, to be sure, but it’s hard to tell just how long that will take. That cre­ates the ne­ces­sity for pos­it­ive ef­forts by mu­ni­cip­al gov­ern­ments and their ci­vil­ian and in­dustry al­lies to make this tech­no­logy and its as­so­ci­ated cost sav­ings avail­able for those who want it but can’t get it on their own. L.A. has found a power­ful mod­el for do­ing that, one that oth­er cit­ies would do well to ex­plore.

Re­prin­ted with the per­mis­sion from City Lab. The ori­gin­al ver­sion can be found here. 


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.