House Democrats Exploit Their Technological Edge in Fundraising

The DCCC has been able to turbocharge its fundraising during landmark political events.

An employee counts USD notes at a money change outlet in Jakarta on June 14, 2013.
National Journal
Scott Bland
Add to Briefcase
Scott Bland
Feb. 7, 2014, midnight

House Demo­crats de­livered an­oth­er huge on­line fun­drais­ing haul in 2013, un­der­scor­ing the gap between Demo­crat­ic and Re­pub­lic­an di­git­al ef­forts as the GOP tries to make up ground in the tech­no­logy of polit­ics.

The Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee raised $19.4 mil­lion on­line in 2013, twice what the com­mit­tee raised through the In­ter­net in 2011. That puts the DCCC in po­s­i­tion this year to smash the re­cord $49.3 mil­lion it raised on­line for the 2012 elec­tions and con­tin­ue a rare trend: Des­pite be­ing in the minor­ity, House Demo­crats have out­raised Re­pub­lic­ans since 2011.

“We’ve had a sig­ni­fic­ant on­line pro­gram since the 2004 or 2006 cycle,” DCCC di­git­al dir­ect­or Brandon Eng­lish said in an in­ter­view. “But it’s really blown up in the last two cycles. In 2012, a lot of the things we worked on really came to­geth­er.”

In 2013, the DCCC out­raised the NR­CC $75.8 mil­lion to $60.6 mil­lion. On dona­tions of less than $200, the Demo­crat­ic com­mit­tee raised $30 mil­lion to the NR­CC’s $11.6 mil­lion.

Small on­line dona­tions have fueled that trend. Not only did the DCCC bring in far more small dona­tions than the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Con­gres­sion­al Com­mit­tee each month in 2013, the Demo­crats’ massive email list al­lowed them to take ad­vant­age of key polit­ic­al mo­ments and tur­bocharge their fun­drais­ing.

If you wanted to track Demo­crat­ic polit­ic­al for­tunes in 2013 and didn’t have a poll handy, you could do worse than look at the flow of small dona­tions (many of them on­line) to the DCCC. Two of its best three months among small donors came be­fore and dur­ing the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment shut­down, when Demo­crats opened polling leads. The oth­er big spike, in March, came when House Re­pub­lic­ans passed Paul Ry­an’s budget and he hos­ted his party’s fun­drais­ing din­ner.

Those spikes are dir­ectly at­trib­ut­able to the DCCC’s on­line fun­drais­ing pro­gram, which al­lows the com­mit­tee to jump on news when it hap­pens and rustle money out of riled-up sup­port­ers. “Something hap­pens at 3 and we can get an email out the door at 5,” Eng­lish said. That’s what the com­mit­tee did in 2012 when Ry­an be­came Mitt Rom­ney’s vice pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee and de­livered a na­tion­ally tele­vised con­ven­tion speech, both of which led to mon­ster fun­drais­ing days on­line.

“A lot of the tac­tics that got brought to light in the Obama cam­paign in 2012, you could see in DCCC fun­drais­ing years be­fore,” said Re­pub­lic­an strategist Patrick Ruffini. That’s helped Demo­crats take over the small-dol­lar fun­drais­ing dom­in­ance that Re­pub­lic­ans used to en­joy thanks to their own pi­on­eer­ing tech­niques in the 20th cen­tury.

“The kind of prac­tices the DCCC has been do­ing really re­minds me of Re­pub­lic­an dir­ect mail,” Ruffini said. “I al­ways mar­vel at this ma­chine the RNC had, and a lot of Re­pub­lic­an or­gan­iz­a­tions had, in terms of dir­ect mail. It just worked; you start it up and it runs.”

“Demo­crats had to catch up, and they did it through the In­ter­net,” Ruffini con­tin­ued.

Now Re­pub­lic­ans are work­ing that angle harder.

The NR­CC does not re­lease its on­line fun­drais­ing totals, but the com­mit­tee said it’s mak­ing pro­gress com­pared to years past, with on­line fun­drais­ing up 250 per­cent in 2013 com­pared with 2011, ac­cord­ing to Ger­rit Lans­ing, the com­mit­tee’s di­git­al dir­ect­or. In 2014, the NR­CC hopes to raise more than five times as much cash on­line as it did in the last elec­tion year.

The NR­CC’s prob­lem is that it is just start­ing to build up its on­line pro­gram, while the DCCC is reap­ing di­vidends from a dec­ade of ef­fort. The Re­pub­lic­an com­mit­tee didn’t start dir­ect­ing ser­i­ous re­sources in­to build­ing its email list un­til 2012 — and late 2012 at that. Even though the NR­CC is now in­vest­ing in that heav­ily un­der Chair­man Greg Walden, it will take years to reach the on­line fun­drais­ing heights Demo­crats have achieved.

That’s part of the reas­on that the NR­CC de­b­uted a new web­site last year. Dry press re­leases are nowhere to be found; the fo­cus, in­stead, is on share­able con­tent that can drive people to the site, which is plastered in “con­trib­ute” and “sign up” but­tons where the com­mit­tee can gath­er email ad­dresses.

“An ele­ment of the list-build­ing we’ve done is a new con­tent strategy that’s ex­ecuted on a daily basis by the com­mu­nic­a­tions and di­git­al de­part­ment,” Lans­ing said. ” “¦ As a res­ult of in­com­ing traffic from this strategy, we’ve seen a sig­ni­fic­ant up­tick in daily and monthly dona­tions just from people com­ing in from shared con­tent on so­cial net­works.”

The real gain, though, comes later, when the NR­CC email list grows big enough to lever­age the way Demo­crats have. All the ef­fort in the world can’t change that in one year.

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×