Begich Personifies Democratic Divide on Climate

ANCHORAGE, AK - JANUARY 18: Senator Mark Begich (D-Alaska) photographed near University Lake in Anchorage, Alaska, on January 18, 2013, in Anchorage, Alaska. Begich faces reelection in 2014. 
National Journal
Amy Harder
Add to Briefcase
Amy Harder
Feb. 6, 2014, 2:43 p.m.

For­get cli­mate-deny­ing Re­pub­lic­ans. Demo­crats face big di­vi­sions of their own about how to tackle glob­al warm­ing. And Sen. Mark Be­gich of Alaska, one of a hand­ful of vul­ner­able, mod­er­ate Demo­crats up for reelec­tion in an en­ergy-rich state, of­fers a glimpse in­to this split.

Be­gich, who ranks in the middle of the lib­er­al-con­ser­vat­ive spec­trum in Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s 2013 vote rat­ings for the Sen­ate re­leased Thursday, ac­know­ledges glob­al warm­ing is real. He reg­u­larly points out how Alaska is already be­ing af­fected by it, but he says politi­cians should dis­cuss cli­mate change in the con­text of sav­ing money and as­sess­ing risks, not car­bon emis­sions.

“You have to broaden the per­spect­ive and look at what’s the goal here,” Be­gich said in an in­ter­view. “If the goal is to lower emis­sions, that’s dis­con­nec­ted to most people. If the goal is to save tax­pay­ers’ money, now the pub­lic has some in­terest.”

Be­gich and oth­ers in a sim­il­ar spot like Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisi­ana, Kay Hagan of North Car­o­lina, and Mark Pry­or of Arkan­sas were not among the 18 Demo­crats who un­veiled a cli­mate-change task force last month.

“The pur­pose is to use the bully pul­pit of our Sen­ate of­fices to achieve that wake-up call,” Sen­ate En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Bar­bara Box­er said at a brief­ing an­noun­cing the new ini­ti­at­ive. “We be­lieve that cli­mate change is a cata­strophe that is un­fold­ing be­fore our eyes, and we want Con­gress to take off the blind­folds.”

On Thursday, House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Henry Wax­man, who works with Box­er and Sen. Shel­don White­house, D-R.I., on cli­mate-change is­sues, an­nounced that he and oth­er House Demo­crats are go­ing to high­light the risks of cli­mate change in reg­u­lar op-eds in The Huff­ing­ton Post.

Their po­s­i­tions aren’t aligned with that of Be­gich, who says cost should be a more para­mount con­cern. “That’s how we should be talk­ing about this,” he said. “If we’re over here, and that’s why I have a little rub with the task force, if you’re just talk­ing about emis­sions, we un­der­stand that be­cause we talk in that lan­guage, but if you con­vert that to ‘Your in­sur­ance rates are go­ing up,’ or ‘That elec­tri­city bill could be lower,’ then sud­denly.”¦”

The task force launched by Box­er and White­house is “try­ing to put this is­sue back on the table, which I think is a fair dis­cus­sion,” Be­gich said.

When asked why he didn’t par­ti­cip­ate in the co­ali­tion’s press con­fer­ence, Be­gich re­spon­ded: “Prob­ably be­cause they know where I would be, and I would not be 100 per­cent in the dir­ec­tion of how they’re go­ing about it.”

He plans to show up at task force meet­ings, though, even if he’s not a form­al par­ti­cipant.

“I think it’s im­port­ant that they hear the broad per­spect­ive of how to deal with this from a state that’s ground zero on this,” said Be­gich, re­fer­ring to his im­promptu and un­of­fi­cial par­ti­cip­a­tion in pre­vi­ous cli­mate talks.

Con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ist groups are hop­ing to use cli­mate change — and mod­er­ate Demo­crats’ pre­sumed sup­port for pri­cing car­bon emis­sions — as a polit­ic­al tool against them this cycle.

Be­gich said ac­know­ledging cli­mate change is real and sup­port­ing ac­tion (al­beit not a car­bon tax or cap-and-trade) doesn’t help or hurt him in his reelec­tion bid. “With my base, they’ll greatly ap­pre­ci­ate it, and with mod­er­ates, they’ll like it be­cause they un­der­stand it,” Be­gich said. “For people who are just anti-cli­mate change, well, it is what it is.”

While Demo­crats are split on what to do about cli­mate change, Re­pub­lic­ans are isol­ated al­most to the point of be­ing ir­rel­ev­ant. Many don’t talk about the is­sue at all, and most of those who do re­fuse to ac­know­ledge it is real and that burn­ing of fossil fuels is a big factor. That’s out of step with nearly 70 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans who say glob­al warm­ing is a real prob­lem, ac­cord­ing to a Pew Re­search poll last year.

Ben Geman contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
COULD COME UNDER MUELLER’S SCRUTINY
Deutsche Bank Gave Kushner a $285 Million Loan in October
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

"One month before Election Day, Jared Kushner’s real estate company finalized a $285 million loan as part of a refinancing package for its property near Times Square in Manhattan. The loan came at a critical moment. Kushner was playing a key role in the presidential campaign of his father-in-law, Donald Trump. The lender, Deutsche Bank, was negotiating to settle a federal mortgage fraud case and charges from New York state regulators that it aided a possible Russian money-laundering scheme."

Source:
WANTS ANSWERS ON CLINTON EMAIL PROBE
Senate Judiciary Sends Questions to Loretta Lynch
2 days ago
THE LATEST
ARE “OPEN TO NEGOTIATION”
Sens. Paul, Cruz, Johnson and Lee Oppose Senate Health Care Bill
3 days ago
THE LATEST

The four Senators released a joint statement, saying in part, "There are provisions in this draft that repreesnt an improvement to our current health care system, but it does not appear this draft as written will accomplish the most important promise we made to Americans: to repeal Obamacare and lower their health care costs."

Source:
TRUMP SUGGESTED THERE WERE TAPES
No Comey Tapes
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump tweeted Thursday afternoon, "With all of the recently reported electronic surveillance, intercepts, unmasking and illegal leaking of information, I have no idea whether there are "tapes" or recordings of my conversations with James Comey, but I did not make, and do not have, any such recordings."

Source:
DEVELOPING
Senate Healthcare Bill In Trouble?
3 days ago
BREAKING
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login