Ambassador: Rejection of Keystone Would ‘Definitely Strain’ U.S.-Canadian Relations

View of the Syncrude oil sands extraction facility near the town of Fort McMurray in Alberta Province, Canada on October 25, 2009. Greenpeace is calling for an end to oil sands mining in the region due to their greenhouse gas emissions and have recently staged sit-ins which briefly halted production at several mines. At an estimated 175 billion barrels, Alberta's oil sands are the second largest oil reserve in the world behind Saudi Arabia, but they were neglected for years, except by local companies, because of high extraction costs. Since 2000, skyrocketing crude oil prices and improved extraction methods have made exploitation more economical, and have lured several multinational oil companies to mine the sands.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
Feb. 10, 2014, 2:10 a.m.

Canada’s am­bas­sad­or to the U.S. isn’t sug­ar­coat­ing the dip­lo­mat­ic weight of the loom­ing White House de­cision on the Key­stone XL pipeline.

Gary Doer told the news ser­vice Platts that he’s op­tim­ist­ic about win­ning ap­prov­al, while warn­ing that re­jec­tion would be “per­ceived as be­ing polit­ic­al” and “def­in­itely strain” U.S.-Ca­na­dian re­la­tions. He ar­gued that the pro­ject has met the vari­ous U.S. bench­marks, cit­ing the State De­part­ment’s en­vir­on­ment­al ana­lys­is re­leased Jan. 31.

“The re­port ba­sic­ally says that [oil from Al­berta’s oil sands] either will come down on rail with high­er GHGs, and it is now com­ing down on rail, or it can come down on a pipeline with less GHGs,” he told Platts En­ergy Week TV, us­ing the ac­ronym for green­house gases.

“So I guess I would say, based on this re­port and based on the pres­id­ent’s own stated [cli­mate] cri­ter­ia, that if the pro­ject is re­jec­ted it would be per­ceived as be­ing polit­ic­al and not on the basis of the pub­lic in­terest of the United states and Canada,” Doer ad­ded in the in­ter­view that aired Sunday.

Doer and oth­er pipeline back­ers are push­ing hard to cap­it­al­ize on the State De­part­ment re­port.

But State’s ana­lys­is is just one factor in play. A Wall Street Journ­al story on Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry’s loom­ing per­mit de­cision high­lights an­oth­er one.

“One point Mr. Kerry will con­sider is the im­port­ance of the U.S. tak­ing a lead role in ad­dress­ing cli­mate is­sues,” states the story that ran over the week­end.

Kerry, who has pri­or­it­ized cli­mate change dur­ing his long polit­ic­al ca­reer, may be wrest­ling with wheth­er ap­prov­al would hurt the U.S. in glob­al cli­mate policy plan­ning.

Con­sider European Uni­on cli­mate chief Con­nie Hede­gaard’s com­ments a year ago. She said re­ject­ing Key­stone would be an “ex­tremely strong sig­nal” on cli­mate from the second-term Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

So, the Journ­al piece is a re­mind­er that the fate of Key­stone could rest on more than fine-grain ana­lyses of fu­ture rail ca­pa­city and oil-sands pro­duc­tion out­looks.

In oth­er Key­stone XL news, The Wash­ing­ton Post re­ports on the up­com­ing State De­part­ment in­spect­or gen­er­al re­port on State’s en­vir­on­ment­al ana­lys­is of Key­stone.

En­vir­on­ment­al­ists have al­leged that En­vir­on­ment­al Re­sources Man­age­ment, the con­sult­ing firm that State re­tained to craft the ana­lys­is, suffered from con­flicts of in­terest.

“Ac­cord­ing to in­di­vidu­als fa­mil­i­ar with the in­spect­or gen­er­al’s probe, who spoke on the con­di­tion of an­onym­ity be­cause the re­port is not fi­nal, a cur­rent draft sug­gests the agency ex­am­ine its con­flict-of-in­terest pro­cess but does not find that State De­part­ment of­fi­cials vi­ol­ated agency rules in re­tain­ing ERM,” the Post re­ports.

The ana­lys­is in ques­tion es­sen­tially found that the Key­stone pipeline is un­likely to cause a surge in green­house-gas emis­sions (al­though it in­cludes an al­tern­at­ive mod­el­ing scen­ario that’s less san­guine about Key­stone’s cli­mate foot­print).

En­vir­on­ment­al­ists bat­tling the pipeline kept up their cam­paign over the week­end.

“The dirti­est oil on the plan­et comes from those tar sands. We can’t let that oil out of the ground. That’s what the sci­ent­ists say. We need to leave a sig­ni­fic­ant amount of our fossil-fuel re­serves in the ground if we have any chance of solv­ing the cli­mate crisis,” said League of Con­ser­va­tion Voters Pres­id­ent Gene Kar­p­in­ski dur­ing a Sunday in­ter­view with C-SPAN.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
3 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login