What Do Terrorism and Online Poker Have in Common?

According to Sheldon Adelson’s latest attack ad: quite a bit.

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Feb. 10, 2014, 7:11 a.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4718) }}

In­ter­net gambling will des­troy lives and homes while help­ing mob­sters and ter­ror­ists, at least ac­cord­ing to a new ad fun­ded by Shel­don Ad­el­son.

The bil­lion­aire casino mag­nate’s anti-on­line-gambling group is out with its first video at­tempt­ing to take down In­ter­net gambling by liken­ing it to a home-des­troy­ing activ­ity that will aid money-laun­der­ing crim­in­als and ter­ror­ists.

“While the FBI is busy de­fend­ing against ter­ror­ist threats and cy­ber­at­tacks, In­ter­net gambling will give crim­in­als across the world a foothold in every Amer­ic­an house­hold, at­tract­ing crim­in­al activ­ity not only at home but in­ter­na­tion­ally,” the ad warns, while at­tempt­ing to pass off press re­leases and ed­it­or­i­als that claim the activ­ity is a “stra­tegic na­tion­al threat” as ob­ject­ive news re­port­ing.

Sen­ate Com­merce Chair­man Jay Rock­e­feller said last year that In­ter­net gambling may pose some risks, in­clud­ing “po­ten­tial for money laun­der­ing used for ter­ror­ist fin­an­cing.” But des­pite such con­cerns in some corners, on­line gambling ad­voc­ates quickly poun­ded on the video, call­ing it “ab­surd” and “ir­re­spons­ible.”

“The no­tion that li­censed and reg­u­lated In­ter­net poker would be an at­tract­ive con­duit for ter­ror­ism fin­an­cing is on its face laugh­able,” said John Pap­pas, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Poker Play­ers Al­li­ance, in a state­ment. “There isn’t a shred of evid­ence to sup­port this, ex­cept for far-fetched claims man­u­fac­tured by this co­ali­tion.”

The rhet­or­ic of the at­tack ad — and its omin­ous back­track and alarm­ist nar­rat­or — is noth­ing new from Ad­el­son, who vowed last year to “spend whatever it takes” to stop on­line gambling in the U.S., which he has per­sist­ently lam­basted as “a so­ci­et­al train wreck wait­ing to hap­pen.”

The best part? Ex­pect more videos of this ilk to flood the Web in the weeks ahead. Today’s clip, which ar­rives as at least 10 states are weigh­ing le­gis­la­tion that would leg­al­ize or loosen re­stric­tions on In­ter­net gambling, is the be­gin­ning of a six-fig­ure “aware­ness cam­paign” from Ad­el­son’s group. The ad ad­di­tion­ally cites an FBI let­ter sug­gest­ing that on­line casi­nos “are vul­ner­able to a wide ar­ray of crim­in­al schemes.”

But the oc­to­gen­ari­an busi­ness mogul has made it clear that no sum of money is too large for him to throw around in pur­suit of any polit­ic­al goal. Ad­el­son, of course, rose to na­tion­al prom­in­ence dur­ing the 2012 pres­id­en­tial elec­tion cycle, when he spent tens of mil­lions of dol­lars sup­port­ing a lit­any of Re­pub­lic­an con­tenders. His cash in­fu­sions to Newt Gin­grich’s flag­ging cam­paign al­most single-handedly kept the former House Speak­er in the race long after it was clear he wouldn’t win the nom­in­a­tion.

Mean­while, the In­ter­net gambling lob­by­ing space is quickly get­ting crowded. Last week saw the launch of the Co­ali­tion for Con­sumer and On­line Pro­tec­tion, which is in the throes of a $250,000 ad push against a fed­er­al on­line gambling ban.

Rep. Joe Bar­ton’s In­ter­net Free­dom Act, in­tro­duced last Ju­ly, would cre­ate a mar­ket al­low­ing the gov­ern­ment to li­cense and reg­u­late on­line poker. States would be af­forded autonomy to opt out of the sys­tem. The Texas Re­pub­lic­an hu­mor­ously sug­ges­ted that God sup­ports on­line gambling dur­ing a hear­ing in Decem­ber.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
16 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
×