A U.S. bill introduced late last week would renew the Homeland Security Department’s chemical-security initiative for two years and set benchmarks for the effort.
The legislation offered by Representative Patrick Meehan (R-Penn.) would allow for “automatic re-approval” of alternative security plans under the Chemical Facility Antiterrorism Standards initiative, which aims to reduce the risk of sabotage at sites handling potentially dangerous chemicals. The proposal also would allow the Homeland Security secretary to permit outside audits and compliance checks of chemical sites, according to a House Homeland Security Committee press release.
The program has faced criticism from lawmakers in recent years for its slow assessment of site-protection plans, as well as a multitude of other management issues.
The new legislation would seek to prevent facilities from falling “off the grid” of oversight by requiring the Homeland Security Department to implement a “workable” system for categorizing relative levels of risk for catastrophe posed by various sites, the committee statement says. It adds that the bill directs the department to take related steps with input from agencies and private entities at state and local levels.
The Homeland Security Secretary would have to “confirm progress” on the matter within 18 months, the press release says.
“This bipartisan legislation takes meaningful, prudent steps toward strengthening the security of our chemical facilities and it sends a message to both industry and the Obama administration that Congress is serious about addressing the vulnerability of our chemical sector to terrorist attack,” Meehan said in released remarks. He chairs the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security Technologies.
The bill’s backers include House Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul (R-Texas), as well as Representatives Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) and Gene Green (D-Texas). Its other co-sponsors are Representatives Peter King (R-N.Y.), who chairs the homeland security panel’s Counterterrorism and Intelligence Subcommittee, and Candice Miller (R-Mich.), who chairs the Border and Maritime Security Subcommittee.
The Homeland Security Committee has introduced legislation in the past to re-authorize the chemical-security initiative, but the proposals did not advance in the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which shares jurisdiction over the program.
What We're Following See More »
After more than a month of back and forth, a failed bill, and GOP embarrassment, the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus has announced that it will support the Obamacare replacement legislation in its most recent iteration. Rep. Mark Meadows, the chairman of the caucus, said the roughly 30 members of the caucus view this compromise as the best option short of a full repeal. A recent amendment, authored by Meadows and Rep. Tom McArthur, co-chair of the more moderate Tuesday Group, would allow states to apply for waivers exempting them from provisions forbidding insurers from charging higher prices to those with pre-existing conditions if the state set up a high-risk pool. The plan's passage in the House is not a done deal though, as a number of moderate lawmakers have resisted supporting the amendment.
"A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer fired a warning flare toward an Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessel coming near it in the Persian Gulf. The incident happened Monday as the vessel closed to within 1,000 meters of the USS Mahan, "despite the destroyer trying to turn away from it." After attempting to contact the Iranian vessel and sounding its whistle, it deployed the flare. After that, the ship had had enough and turned away.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."