The U.S. increasingly is targeting lethal drone strikes based on cell-phone location data rather than on-the-ground intelligence, according to the latest allegations from journalist Glenn Greenwald and former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.
A former drone operator told Greenwald that the military uses the National Security Agency’s controversial phone metadata program to locate suspected terrorists. That intelligence is then used to call in drone strikes, which has led to civilian deaths when the phone is no longer in the possession of the original target.
From the report:
Some [targets] have as many as 16 different SIM cards associated with their identity within the High Value Target system. Others, unaware that their mobile phone is being targeted, lend their phone, with the SIM card in it, to friends, children, spouses, and family members.
Some top Taliban leaders, knowing of the NSA’s targeting method, have purposely and randomly distributed SIM cards among their units in order to elude their trackers. “They would do things like go to meetings, take all their SIM cards out, put them in a bag, mix them up, and everybody gets a different SIM card when they leave,” the former drone operator says. “That’s how they confuse us.”
The former drone operator alleged that the military has carried out strikes without verifying that the phone being tracked is still being used by the original target. “We’re not going after people — we’re going after their phones, in the hopes that the person on the other end of that missile is the bad guy,” he said.
In some cases, the drones themselves help find terrorists’ phones, acting as fake cell-phone towers to grab the signal of a target’s device. Once the phone is found, it can be tracked to within 30 feet. That tactic is especially common in Yemen, where on-the-ground intelligence is hard to come by.
Meanwhile, AP reports that an American citizen who is a member of al-Qaida is possibly being targeted for a drone strike. It’s unclear if phone metadata is being used to track the suspected terrorist.
What We're Following See More »
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."
Evan McMullin came out on top in a Emerson College poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clinton took third with 24%. Gary Johnson received 5% of the vote in the survey.
A new Quinnipiac University poll finds Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” vanished from the university’s early October poll. A new PPRI/Brookings survey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a virtual dead heat, with Trump taking 41% of the vote to Clinton’s 40% in a four-way matchup.