Conservatives on Debt-Limit Plan: What’s In It for Us?

Spending cuts 10 years down the line don’t cut it for the Far Right.

A view of the US Capitol on January 27, 2014 in Washington.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms
Feb. 10, 2014, 2:56 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship un­veiled a debt-lim­it strategy to mem­ber­ship on Monday night, leav­ing many con­ser­vat­ives won­der­ing what ex­actly is in the bill for Re­pub­lic­ans.

“The bot­tom line is this: This plan in­creases spend­ing and raises the debt ceil­ing. So it makes our fin­an­cial con­di­tion as a coun­try more pre­cari­ous in the years go­ing for­ward,” Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama said of the plan, which would add an ex­tra year of man­dat­ory se­quest­ra­tion cuts in or­der to off­set the cost of elim­in­at­ing re­duc­tions to mil­it­ary pen­sions.

Brooks and oth­ers called the ad­di­tion­al se­quest­ra­tion cuts, which won’t come un­til 2024, a gim­mick, not­ing that little Con­gress might do that far down the line is set in stone. Just look at the ori­gin­al se­quest­ra­tion cuts, which were altered in Decem­ber’s budget agree­ment, only nine months after they first took ef­fect.

“Yeah, a dec­ade from now [we’ll get the off­set], which to me is no off­set at all,” Brooks said. “You have to go through 10 years of Con­gresses be­fore you have a pay-for for an ex­pendit­ure that is im­me­di­ate.”

This is the second time in re­cent months that Con­gress has looked to se­quest­ra­tion to off­set new spend­ing. Once viewed as cuts so ter­ri­fy­ing that no mem­ber of Con­gress would al­low them to take ef­fect, a ma­jor­ity of mem­bers in both parties and both cham­bers passed the budget deal in Decem­ber that ad­ded an­oth­er two years to the man­dat­ory se­quester cuts.

“When you have a pres­id­ent that doesn’t want to go to the man­dat­ory side of spend­ing and we’ve cut be­low what even the Re­pub­lic­ans put out there on the dis­cre­tion­ary side, you’re left with no oth­er op­tions,” Rep. Dev­in Nunes, R-Cal­if., ar­gued.

“Look, nobody likes any of this. But there’s prob­lems with every bill we put up. I just think the lead­er­ship feels this one gives the best chance for us to get Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats to vote for it, get us to 218 votes,” Nunes ad­ded.

Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga., in­dic­ated that he’ll be a “no” vote but agreed that lead­er­ship is do­ing its best to get mem­bers from both parties to pass a debt-ceil­ing hike. “They’re try­ing their best to find their an­swer,” he said.

House Re­pub­lic­ans were ex­pec­ted to post the bill with the Rules Com­mit­tee Monday even­ing, set­ting up a Wed­nes­day-morn­ing vote and leav­ing little time for ar­gu­ment with­in the caucus. Still, mem­bers over­all ex­pect the bill to pass eas­ily with Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic sup­port. One House Re­pub­lic­an es­tim­ated that as much as 50 per­cent of his caucus would sup­port the meas­ure.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
22 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
1 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
1 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
2 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login