A Fatal Case of “Summit Fatigue”

Why the Nuclear Security Summit will likely end when Obama’s presidency does.

AP Photo/Charles Dharapak
George E. Condon Jr.
Add to Briefcase
George E. Condon Jr.
March 30, 2016, 8 p.m.

Lead­ers from more than 50 coun­tries have ar­rived in Wash­ing­ton to pay their re­spects. Mourn­ers in­clude pres­id­ents, prime min­is­ters, a chan­cel­lor, and sev­er­al for­eign min­is­ters. Pres­id­ent Obama, fath­er of the de­ceased, will lead the two-day ser­vice at the Wash­ing­ton Con­ven­tion Cen­ter. “Gift bas­kets” are en­cour­aged.

The oc­ca­sion, rare in in­ter­na­tion­al dip­lomacy, is the passing of a sum­mit—the Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Sum­mit. The pro­geny of Obama, it was con­ceived by the pres­id­ent in 2009 in a land­mark speech in Prague, was born in a Wash­ing­ton sum­mit in 2010, ma­tured in 2012 in Seoul and 2014 in the Neth­er­lands, and ex­pires Fri­day when the gavel comes down in Wash­ing­ton. Closely iden­ti­fied with this pres­id­ent, there ap­pears to be little chance of it be­ing brought back to life by his suc­cessor.

That life already is be­ing me­mori­al­ized at the White House and the State De­part­ment as mov­ing closer to the goal set by Obama in his ad­dress to 20,000 gathered out­side Prague Castle “to se­cure all vul­ner­able nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al around the world.” No one dis­putes, though, that much re­mains to be done to reach the goal and that the pres­id­ent’s ori­gin­al timetable of four years was un­real­ist­ic.

This year’s sum­mit, while fo­cused primar­ily on keep­ing nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al from ter­ror­ists, also gives the pres­id­ent the op­por­tun­ity to host a meet­ing Thursday even­ing with the lead­ers of Ja­pan and South Korea, two key U.S. al­lies whose squab­bling has con­cerned the ad­min­is­tra­tion. Obama also will meet sep­ar­ately with Chinese Pres­id­ent Xi Jin­ping and will over­see a re­view of the strategy be­ing fol­lowed to de­feat ter­ror­ists across the globe.

One pos­sible meet­ing has been scratched with Wed­nes­day’s an­nounce­ment that Pakistani Prime Min­is­ter Nawaz Sharif has had to can­cel be­cause of the ter­ror­ist at­tack in Lahore. In a state­ment, Obama in­dic­ated that he un­der­stood the de­cision and con­demned “this cal­lous and ap­palling at­tack against in­no­cent ci­vil­ians.”

Be­cause he sees the end of his pres­id­ency loom­ing, Obama opens the sum­mit with a sense of ur­gency, with this as his last chance to bring the oth­er lead­ers to his view that much more must be done to move bey­ond the reach of ter­ror­ists the fis­sile ma­ter­i­al they would need to make small nuc­le­ar devices or dirty bombs, either plutoni­um or highly en­riched urani­um. He wants to build on the clear pro­gress achieved in the earli­er sum­mits, with sev­er­al coun­tries already hav­ing sur­rendered all their bomb-grade fuel.

The White House is en­cour­aging many of the par­ti­cip­at­ing lead­ers to vol­un­tar­ily com­mit to the agenda, stat­ing there will be at least 17 joint state­ments—or as they are known in this sum­mit, “gift bas­kets”—out­lining pro­gress in se­cur­ing or rid­ding them­selves of the fis­sile ma­ter­i­al.

But the sum­mit opens with one ma­jor chair empty. At the earli­er sum­mits in 2010 and 2012, then-Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Dmitry Med­ve­dev at­ten­ded. In 2014, Min­is­ter of For­eign Af­fairs Sergey Lav­rov at­ten­ded. But Vladi­mir Putin, who re­turned to the Rus­si­an pres­id­ency in 2012, takes a dim view of the Obama-sponsored sum­mit pro­cess and is send­ing only “ob­serv­ers” to Wash­ing­ton this week.

Ben Rhodes, deputy na­tion­al se­cur­ity ad­visor for stra­tegic com­mu­nic­a­tions, called Putin’s de­cision “a missed op­por­tun­ity for Rus­sia,” con­tend­ing that the coun­try has “be­nefited enorm­ously from co­oper­a­tion on nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity and non-pro­lif­er­a­tion in the past.” He praised Rus­sia’s role in for­cing Ir­an to sign a deal to con­trol its nuc­le­ar pro­gram. “Frankly, all they are do­ing is isol­at­ing them­selves in not par­ti­cip­at­ing as they have in the past.”

Olga Oliker, dir­ect­or of the Rus­sia and Euras­ia pro­gram at the Cen­ter for Stra­tegic and In­ter­na­tion­al Stud­ies, said the cur­rent ten­sions between Wash­ing­ton and Mo­scow are partly to blame. But she said Putin also is chaf­ing at par­ti­cip­at­ing in a sum­mit “that is so clearly a U.S. baby.” She said Putin is try­ing to send sig­nals “that they’re im­port­ant, that they’re a great power and that … they don’t fol­low the U.S. lead, that they chart their own course.”

Rus­sia prefers what will re­place the Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Sum­mits. Ac­cord­ing to Shar­on Squas­soni, who has worked on non­pro­lif­er­a­tion is­sues both in Con­gress and at the State De­part­ment in the Clin­ton ad­min­is­tra­tion, the onus now shifts to five in­ter­na­tion­al or­gan­iz­a­tions, in­clud­ing the In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency and the United Na­tions.

She cred­its the Obama ini­ti­at­ive and the sum­mits with “sus­tained pro­gress in nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity” and cast this week’s sum­mit as “a bit of a vic­tory lap for the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.” Even with its suc­cesses, though, it would have been dif­fi­cult to re­sus­cit­ate the sum­mits even if Obama re­mained in of­fice.

“There is a bit of what we would call sum­mit fa­tigue,” she said. “This is the fourth one in six years and these take a lot of ef­fort. It’s not just the sum­mit, but there are Sherpa meet­ings and sous-Sherpa meet­ings and a lot of ne­go­ti­at­ing over sum­mit com­mu­niques and work plans and the like.”

Ad­di­tion­ally, world lead­ers are deal­ing with an ex­plo­sion of sum­mitry. Al­most every over­seas trip by a U.S. pres­id­ent is linked to a sum­mit. Be­fore 1975, there was only one reg­u­lar sum­mit, NATO. In 1975, what be­came the G-8 sum­mit began. Then, APEC and U.S.-EU in 1993; G-20 in 2008, East Asia in 2011. When the nuc­le­ar-se­cur­ity gath­er­ing was ad­ded, a U.S. pres­id­ent faced the pro­spect of sev­en sum­mits in a single year—eight if you in­clude the an­nu­al open­ing of the United Na­tions Gen­er­al As­sembly.

This dip­lo­mat­ic over­load ex­plains why there will be no tears among the plaudits at the con­ven­tion cen­ter when this par­tic­u­lar sum­mit is laid to rest.

What We're Following See More »
INAPPROPRIATE TOUCHING, TEXTS
Another Woman Accuses Rep. Kihuen of Harassment
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Once-rising Democratic star Rep. Ruben Kihuen made repeated and unwanted sexual advances toward a female lobbyist while he was a state senator, the woman told The Nevada Independent. The woman, who requested anonymity because of concerns about being identified and the possible consequences in Nevada’s small political world, says that Kihuen touched her thighs or buttocks on three separate occasions without her consent. She also showed the Independent hundreds of suggestive text messages she received from Kihuen."

Source:
“NORMAL SIDE EFFECTS”
McCain Returns to Hospital for Treatment
11 hours ago
THE LATEST
IN CONFERENCE COMMITTEE NOW
House, Senate Agree in Principle on Tax Bill
16 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"House and Senate negotiators have reached a deal on a tax plan" and plan to send the legislation to President Trump before Christmas, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch said Wednesday. "CNBC previously reported that a version of the GOP proposal — as of Tuesday — features a 21 percent corporate tax rate and a top individual rate of 37 percent. It would also allow a mortgage interest deduction on loans up to $750,000."

Source:
GOODLATTE WARNS OF “EXTREME BIAS”
Rosenstein Denies Any Impropriety by Mueller’s Team
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

At a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee today, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said "there's nothing inappropriate about FBI officials on special counsel Robert Mueller's team holding political opinions so long as it doesn't affect their work." Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) said recently disclosed texts among former members of Mueller's team, "which were turned over to the panel Tuesday night by the Justice Department, revealed 'extreme bias.'"

Source:
WILL APPROVE NEXT WEEK
GOP Will Not Wait for Jones for Final Tax Vote
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Senate Republicans will vote on the tax reform bill next week and will not delay consideration until Senator-elect Doug Jones is seated in the coming weeks. Republicans will stick to their plan to clear tax reform bill before adjourning at the end of next week, according to a Capitol Hill source with knowledge of the plan."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login