GOP Goes After Obama With New Benghazi Report

The report aligns closely with party findings from last year.

McKeon: One of the last hawks.
National Journal
Feb. 11, 2014, 6:49 a.m.

A House sub­com­mit­tee re­port re­leased Tues­day places the blame over the re­sponse to the Benghazi ter­ror­ist at­tack squarely on the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s shoulders.

The re­port from the House Armed Ser­vices Sub­com­mit­tee on Over­sight and In­vest­ig­a­tions is backed by Re­pub­lic­an mem­bers of the sub­com­mit­tee, as well as Reps. Buck McK­eon, Mac Thorn­berry, and Martha Roby. And though at mul­tiple points the re­port singles out the White House and the State De­part­ment as be­ing at fault, it largely clears the De­fense De­part­ment from any blame.

The re­port isn’t the first time mem­bers of Con­gress have ques­tioned the State De­part­ment’s ac­tions in the wake of the Benghazi at­tack. A Janu­ary re­port from the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee found that the State De­part­ment didn’t in­crease se­cur­ity des­pite warn­ings.

Tues­day’s re­port con­tains a hand­ful of key find­ings:

  • The White House either ig­nored or didn’t un­der­stand the shift­ing se­cur­ity threat in Libya, and threats to U.S. in­terests in the coun­try.

  • U.S. per­son­nel in Benghazi were vul­ner­able be­cause the ad­min­is­tra­tion didn’t call for an in­crease in mil­it­ary pres­ence, there wasn’t a spe­cif­ic “im­min­ent” threat in the coun­try, and the State De­part­ment pressed for few­er De­fense De­part­ment se­cur­ity of­fi­cials in Libya.

  • The De­fense De­part­ment be­lieved from the be­gin­ning that the Sept. 11, 2012 in­cid­ent was a ter­ror­ist at­tack.

  • The mil­it­ary did not fully pre­pare for a longer op­er­a­tion in Libya be­cause of un­cer­tainty over the spe­cif­ics of the Benghazi at­tack. And the mil­it­ary’s im­me­di­ate re­sponse to the at­tack was scaled back be­cause of a lack of geo­graph­ic read­i­ness with­in U.S. forces.

  • Mil­it­ary of­fi­cials from Tripoli who tried to aid Benghazi did not re­ceive a “stand down” or­der, but roles and re­spons­ib­il­it­ies for in­di­vidu­als were un­clear.

  • The De­fense De­part­ment is cor­rect­ing faults high­lighted by the Benghazi at­tack, des­pite the de­part­ment’s budget crunch.

A duo of Demo­crat­ic com­mit­tee mem­bers said the re­port should bring “this at­tempt to man­u­fac­ture a scan­dal to an end,” re­fer­ring to what they con­sider a push by some Re­pub­lic­ans to politi­cize the at­tacks.

“While Re­pub­lic­ans in both the House and Sen­ate have con­tin­ued to at­tack the mo­tiv­a­tions and ac­tions of those who serve in our coun­try’s na­tion­al se­cur­ity ap­par­at­us, this Re­pub­lic­an pre­pared re­port clearly states that the De­part­ment of De­fense re­spon­ded ap­pro­pri­ately, quickly, to the best of its abil­ity at that time, and that no ‘stand down’ or­der was ever is­sued. All of these con­clu­sions are counter to as­ser­tions and ac­cus­a­tions leveled by a num­ber of Re­pub­lic­ans,” said Demo­crat­ic Reps. Adam Smith and Niki Tson­gas.

What We're Following See More »
PICTURE IS CLOUDIER ON OBSTRUCTION
Mueller: No Evidence of Collusion
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III found that neither President Trump nor any of his aides conspired or coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference, according to a summary of the special counsel’s findings made public on Sunday by Attorney General William P. Barr. The summary also said that the special counsel’s team lacked sufficient evidence to establish that President Trump illegally obstructed justice, but added that Mr. Mueller’s team stopped short of exonerating Mr. Trump." Read Barr's summary here.

Source:
MUELLER "DOES NOT EXONERATE" TRUMP OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, FINDS NO CONCRETE COLLUSION
Barr Releases Mueller Summary Letter to Congrees
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
BARR MAY BRIEF CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS THIS WEEKEND
Mueller Reports
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has delivered a report on his inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 election to Attorney General William P. Barr ... Barr told congressional leaders in a letter late Friday that he may brief them within days on the special counsel’s findings. 'I may be in a position to advise you of the special counsel’s principal conclusions as soon as this weekend,' he wrote in a letter to the leadership of the House and Senate Judiciary committees. It is up to Mr. Barr how much of the report to share with Congress and, by extension, the American public. The House voted unanimously in March on a nonbinding resolution to make public the report’s findings, an indication of the deep support within both parties to air whatever evidence prosecutors uncovered."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login