A key U.K. judicial body has ruled that Britain must reconsider holding a public inquiry into the polonium poisoning death of Russian dissident Alexander Litvinenko.
A Tuesday ruling by the High Court of Justice in London requires British Home Secretary Theresa May to re-examine her justification for preventing an open investigation of the 2006 incident, Reuters reports. The former KGB officer died after drinking tea tainted with radioactive polonium 210.
May last year blocked a request for such a public probe from Robert Owen, a coroner who led a closed-door look at circumstances surrounding the death.
“If she is to maintain her refusal [to hold an open inquiry], she will need better reasons than those given in the decision letter,” Lord Justice Stephen Richards said in a statement for a three-judge panel. The group unanimously backed the finding, though it issued no direct demand for a public probe.
“The case for setting up an immediate statutory inquiry as requested by the coroner is plainly a strong one,” the three judges added.
An open investigation could implicate Russia in the death, creating potential for political and economic fallout from any findings, according to Reuters. Moscow maintains it was not involved.
Last year, May said political considerations had played a role in her decision not to go forward with an open investigation. She added, though, that those factors were not decisive.
The High Court of Justice said there are “strong reasons of public interest” for the United Kingdom to examine allegations of Russian collusion in the death.
The British Home Office indicated it is reviewing the court’s finding.
Marina Litvinenko, the KGB veteran’s widow who initiated the push for an open probe, said she was happy to learn about Tuesday’s decision.
“This was the murder of a British citizen on the streets of London using radioactive poison. You would have thought that the government would want to get to the bottom of who was behind it,” she said.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.