Is the FCC Trying to Revive the “˜Fairness Doctrine’?

Republicans claim the agency is trying to meddle in TV journalism.

Chris Wallace (right) interviews Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on 'FOX News Sunday' at the FOX News D.C. Bureau on July 27, 2012.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Brendan Sasso
Feb. 12, 2014, midnight

Re­pub­lic­ans are mak­ing a start­ling ac­cus­a­tion: The Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion is quietly try­ing to con­trol the ed­it­or­i­al de­cisions of TV news broad­casts.

In a Wall Street Journ­al op-ed pub­lished on­line Monday, Ajit Pai, a Re­pub­lic­an FCC com­mis­sion­er, said the agency is tak­ing a “dan­ger­ous” first step to­ward “news­room poli­cing” in the style of the now-de­funct Fair­ness Doc­trine. Un­der the con­tro­ver­sial doc­trine, which the FCC aban­doned in 1987 and form­ally took off the books in 2011, the agency re­quired ra­dio and TV sta­tions to air op­pos­ing views on con­tro­ver­sial is­sues.

Pai ex­pressed alarm that the FCC could soon start ques­tion­ing why Fox spends so much time cov­er­ing the at­tacks in Benghazi, or why NBC has fo­cused on the con­tro­versy over lane clos­ures in New Jer­sey.

House Re­pub­lic­ans made a sim­il­ar ac­cus­a­tion in Decem­ber, claim­ing the FCC was work­ing on a “Fair­ness Doc­trine 2.0.”

“Giv­en the wide­spread calls for the com­mis­sion to re­spect the First Amend­ment and stay out of the ed­it­or­i­al de­cisions of re­port­ers and broad­casters, we were shocked to see that the FCC is put­ting it­self back in the busi­ness of at­tempt­ing to con­trol the polit­ic­al speech of journ­al­ists,” Re­pub­lic­an mem­bers of the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee wrote in a let­ter to the FCC.

“It is wrong, it is un­con­sti­tu­tion­al, and we urge you to put a stop to this most re­cent at­tempt to en­gage the FCC as the ‘news po­lice.’ “

The con­tro­versy stems from a study the agency plans to con­duct on “crit­ic­al in­form­a­tion needs.” The FCC is re­quired by law to study ways to elim­in­ate bar­ri­ers to entry for small me­dia busi­nesses.

Among oth­er things, the agency plans to ask TV journ­al­ists about their “news philo­sophy” and “the pro­cess by which stor­ies are se­lec­ted.” The study will gath­er data on “per­ceived sta­tion bi­as” and “per­ceived re­spons­ive­ness to un­der­served pop­u­la­tions.” The FCC also wants to ex­am­ine how loc­al TV sta­tions cov­er “crit­ic­al in­form­a­tion” such as “eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­it­ies” and the “en­vir­on­ment.”

In his op-ed, Pai de­scribed the FCC’s pro­pos­al as send­ing “re­search­ers to grill re­port­ers, ed­it­ors, and sta­tion own­ers about how they de­cide which stor­ies to run.”

Re­spond­ing to the ques­tions is en­tirely vol­un­tary — al­though Pai sug­ges­ted that sta­tions will feel pres­sured to par­ti­cip­ate be­cause they de­pend on FCC li­censes to op­er­ate.

The FCC is not pro­pos­ing any new rules to re­strict the con­tent of TV sta­tions, and the com­mis­sion has said the study is just part of a routine pro­cess of gath­er­ing in­form­a­tion about the TV in­dustry.

But an FCC of­fi­cial said Tues­day that the agency may re­work the study to ad­dress the Re­pub­lic­an con­cerns.

“The com­mis­sion has no in­ten­tion of in­ter­fer­ing in the cov­er­age and ed­it­or­i­al choices that journ­al­ists make,” the of­fi­cial told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “We’re closely re­view­ing the pro­posed re­search design to de­term­ine if an al­tern­at­ive ap­proach is mer­ited.”

The FCC pro­posed the draft study last year un­der Act­ing Chair­wo­man Mignon Cly­burn, be­fore the cur­rent chair­man, Tom Wheel­er, took of­fice. The of­fi­cial said the agency is now work­ing on a new draft of the study.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
13 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×