The Problem With Breast-Cancer Screenings

A new study finds that regular mammograms are not as effective as we thought. They could even be harmful.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 24: The White House is bathed in pink light for National Breast Cancer Awareness Month October 24, 2013 in Washington, DC. October is observed as Breast Cancer Awareness Month every year, by public service groups, medical professionals and government agencies that combine to promote awareness of the disease. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sophie Novack
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sophie Novack
Feb. 12, 2014, 6:25 a.m.

The gen­er­ally ac­cep­ted re­com­mend­a­tion of reg­u­lar breast-can­cer screen­ings in older wo­men just re­ceived a very heavy dose of skep­ti­cism.

A new study pub­lished in the Brit­ish Med­ic­al Journ­al on Tues­day found that reg­u­lar mam­mo­grams did not re­duce the death rate from breast can­cer. They did, however, lead to over­dia­gnos­is and treat­ment.

The Canada-based study is a large-scale, long-term, in-depth look at the im­pact of screen­ings we take for gran­ted as crit­ic­al to can­cer care. It ran­domly as­signed 89,835 wo­men, ages 40 to 59, to either a mam­mo­graphy group (an­nu­al screen­ings) or a con­trol group (no mam­mo­graphy) over a five-year peri­od. All wo­men in the mam­mo­graphy group and those 50 to 59 in the con­trol group re­ceived an­nu­al phys­ic­al breast ex­am­in­a­tions as well; those 40 to 49 in the con­trol re­ceived one phys­ic­al ex­am­in­a­tion fol­lowed by stand­ard care.

The study found that of the 44,925 wo­men in the mam­mo­graphy group, 666 in­vas­ive breast can­cers were dia­gnosed dur­ing the five-year screen­ing peri­od. Of the 44,910 in the con­trol group, 524 were dia­gnosed in this time. Of these, 180 in the mam­mo­graphy group and 171 in the con­trol group died of breast can­cer dur­ing the 25-year fol­low-up.

Over the course of the full study, 3,250 wo­men in the mam­mo­graphy group were dia­gnosed with breast can­cer and 500 died, com­pared with 3,133 dia­gnoses and 505 deaths in the con­trol group. Age did not ap­pear to have an im­pact.

The dif­fer­ence in death rate — 500 versus 505 — is not sig­ni­fic­ant between the two groups, but the dif­fer­ence in dia­gnos­is is. After 15 years of fol­low-up, the study found an ex­cess of 106 breast-can­cer dia­gnoses in the mam­mo­graphy group. Over­all, 22 per­cent of breast can­cers de­tec­ted by screen­ings were over­dia­gnosed.

Mam­mo­grams have long been pro­moted as the ne­ces­sary weapon to com­bat breast can­cer, the second lead­ing cause of can­cer death in wo­men. The Amer­ic­an Can­cer So­ci­ety cur­rently re­com­mends an­nu­al mam­mo­grams for wo­men age 40 and older. The Na­tion­al Can­cer In­sti­tute re­com­mends them every one to two years. The Susan G. Ko­men Found­a­tion, the largest, most well-known breast-can­cer or­gan­iz­a­tion in the U.S., in­cludes reg­u­lar screen­ings as a large part of its mis­sion.

However, the new study com­plic­ates this as­sump­tion. Over­dia­gnos­is can lead to un­ne­ces­sary, harm­ful, and ex­pens­ive treat­ment, and the tests them­selves in­clude small amounts of ra­di­ation that can be harm­ful in heavy doses.

While the find­ings do not ne­ces­sar­ily change these re­com­mend­a­tions, they raise ques­tions about the uni­ver­sal screen­ing pre­scrip­tion for what is clearly a pretty com­plex situ­ation.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
1 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
1 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login