Here’s How Hackers Stole 110 Million Americans’ Data From Target

It appears to be among the biggest phishing catches of all time.

cybersecurity - hacker with credit card and black mask
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Feb. 12, 2014, 10:02 a.m.

More than 110 mil­lion Tar­get cus­tom­ers had their cred­it-card in­form­a­tion stolen be­cause at least one em­ploy­ee of a heat­ing and air-con­di­tion­ing con­tract­or suc­cumbed to an email phish­ing scheme, cy­ber­se­cur­ity blog­ger Bri­an Krebs re­por­ted Wed­nes­day.

The rev­el­a­tion, if true, is the strongest in­dic­a­tion yet of what went wrong since Krebs first ex­posed the massive heist of con­sumer fin­an­cial data at the na­tion­al re­tail gi­ant late last year, a start­ling cy­ber­at­tack that has promp­ted in­tense con­gres­sion­al in­quiry. Nei­man Mar­cus and oth­er chains have also re­cently been vic­tim­ized, though it is not be­lieved that the per­pet­rat­ors are the same.

Last week, Krebs re­por­ted that hack­ers in­filt­rated Tar­get’s net­work by swip­ing the lo­gin cre­den­tials of Fazio Mech­an­ic­al Ser­vices, a Pennsylvania-based con­tract­or.

Now, an­onym­ous sources tell Krebs that cre­den­tials “were stolen in an email mal­ware at­tack at Fazio that began at least two months be­fore thieves star­ted steal­ing card data from thou­sands of Tar­get cash re­gisters.” It ap­pears that the cul­prits used a pass­word-steal­ing bot known as Cit­adel to get the job done.

Fazio, in re­sponse to its sud­den no­tori­ety last week, sent out a state­ment ex­plain­ing that it had been “the vic­tim of a soph­ist­ic­ated cy­ber­at­tack op­er­a­tion.” But Krebs notes that the com­pany’s de­fense against ma­li­cious at­tacks was a free ver­sion of a some­what im­pot­ent anti-mal­ware pro­gram, which “is made ex­pli­citly for in­di­vidu­al users and its li­cense pro­hib­its cor­por­ate use.”

Mem­bers of Con­gress are call­ing for a bill to cre­ate a na­tion­al re­port­ing stand­ard for data breaches sim­il­ar to the one that hit Tar­get. Re­tail­ers and fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tions would be re­quired to no­ti­fy gov­ern­ment and con­sumers of breaches when they oc­cur.

The new rev­el­a­tions ar­rive on a day when the White House rolled out a set of vol­un­tary guidelines in­ten­ded to help busi­nesses de­fend them­selves against hack­ers.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×