Will the Obama Administration Stop Comcast From Buying Time Warner?

The cable giants will try to muscle a $45 billion deal past regulators.

Comcast service truck outside of a Comcast Payment and Technical Facility December 5, 2005 in Mount Prospect, Illinois.
National Journal
Feb. 13, 2014, 5:16 a.m.

Com­cast agreed to buy Time Warner Cable for $45.2 bil­lion on Thursday in a deal that would com­bine the na­tion’s two largest cable pro­viders.

The com­pan­ies say they ex­pect to close the mer­ger by the end of the year, but they first will have to sur­vive what is sure to be a bru­tal reg­u­lat­ory re­view, and op­pon­ents are already press­ing the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to block it en­tirely.

The Justice De­part­ment’s An­ti­trust Di­vi­sion will ex­am­ine wheth­er the mer­ger would in­ap­pro­pri­ately lim­it com­pet­i­tion, while the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion has a broad man­date to block any deals that aren’t in the pub­lic in­terest.

An­ti­cip­at­ing reg­u­lat­ory hurdles, Com­cast already an­nounced it is pre­pared to sell off Time Warner’s sys­tems in areas cov­er­ing 3 mil­lion of its 11 mil­lion sub­scribers. But the com­bined com­pany will still have about 30 mil­lion cus­tom­ers — rep­res­ent­ing about 30 per­cent of the en­tire in­dustry and mak­ing it by far the largest pro­vider.

Con­sumer-ad­vocacy groups are already or­gan­iz­ing their cam­paign to try to kill the deal.

“Com­cast can­not be al­lowed to pur­chase Time Warner Cable. An­ti­trust au­thor­it­ies and the FCC must stop it,” John Bergmay­er, seni­or staff at­tor­ney for Pub­lic Know­ledge, said in a state­ment.

He claimed that Com­cast, which already owns Uni­ver­sal and NBC, would be­come a “bully in the school­yard,” able to dic­tate terms to oth­er com­pan­ies and hike prices on con­sumers.

“TV view­ers, In­ter­net users, and every­one who de­pends on a well-func­tion­ing com­mu­nic­a­tions mar­ket­place would not be­ne­fit from an even more power­ful Com­cast,” Bergmay­er said.

Free Press Pres­id­ent Craig Aaron said a mer­ger of the two gi­ant com­pan­ies should be “un­think­able.”

“This deal would be a dis­aster for con­sumers and must be stopped,” he said.

The FCC and the Justice De­part­ment de­clined to com­ment on the deal Thursday. But Ajit Pai, a Re­pub­lic­an FCC com­mis­sion­er, pre­dicted in Decem­ber that a Com­cast-Time Warner mer­ger would face reg­u­lat­ory op­pos­i­tion. 

“The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has ap­plied great­er scru­tiny to pro­posed mer­gers and ac­quis­i­tions,” Pai told The Wall Street Journ­al.

“Pre­ced­ents like this sug­gest an out­right ac­quis­i­tion by Com­cast of Time Warner Cable could face a num­ber of hurdles in the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.”

The sur­prise an­nounce­ment brings Charter Com­mu­nic­a­tion’s eight-month-long court­ship of Time Warner Cable to an end. Time Warner Cable re­buffed Charter’s of­fer val­ued at $133 per share last month, say­ing it was “grossly in­ad­equate.”

Com­cast will pay $159 per share to Time Warner Cable’s share­hold­ers in an all-stock agree­ment. The mer­ger will add key metro areas such as New York City and Los Angeles to Com­cast’s already large port­fo­lio.

The two com­pan­ies ar­gue that their mer­ger would not harm com­pet­i­tion be­cause there is no over­lap between their sys­tems.

“We do be­lieve this trans­ac­tion will bring real pro-con­sumer be­ne­fits. It’s pro-com­pet­it­ive, strongly in the pub­lic in­terest, and we be­lieve ap­prov­able,” Com­cast CEO Bri­an Roberts said on a con­fer­ence call with re­port­ers.

He also sug­ges­ted that Com­cast is pre­pared to ac­cept an ar­ray of con­di­tions on the deal. To buy NBC-Uni­ver­sal three years ago, Com­cast agreed to abide by the FCC’s net-neut­ral­ity rules, which re­quire In­ter­net pro­viders to treat all web­sites equally.

The D.C. Cir­cuit Court of Ap­peals struck down the rules last month, but be­cause of Com­cast’s agree­ment, the com­pany is bound to fol­low the rules un­til Janu­ary 2018. Roberts said Com­cast would ex­tend that re­quire­ment to Time Warner if the mer­ger is ap­proved.

The FCC could use the deal as an op­por­tun­ity to ex­pand the net-neut­ral­ity re­quire­ments on the na­tion’s largest cable broad­band pro­vider. The agency could also force Com­cast to ac­cept a host of oth­er agree­ments. For ex­ample, the pro­vider agreed to of­fer a low-cost In­ter­net plan for low-in­come con­sumers, called In­ter­net Es­sen­tials, when it bought NBC-Uni­ver­sal.

Law­makers are likely to take a close look at the deal, and the rel­ev­ant com­mit­tees are ex­pec­ted to hold hear­ings. While Con­gress has no form­al power to block the mer­ger, law­makers can put pres­sure on the reg­u­lat­ory agen­cies. 

But Com­cast has deep ties to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion that may prove use­ful. Dav­id Co­hen, who over­sees Com­cast’s lob­by­ing team, was one of Obama’s top bund­lers and held a fun­draiser for him at his home in Phil­adelphia in 2011. At the event, Obama thanked Co­hen and his wife for be­ing “such great friends for so many years.”

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
6 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
6 days ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login