Outside Influences

Another Skirmish in the Food-Labeling Fight

A Senate bill that blocks states from labeling GMO foods is moving forward, but the broader battle rages on.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar
AP Photo/Susan Walsh
Jerry Hagstrom
Add to Briefcase
Jerry Hagstrom
March 1, 2016, 8 p.m.

The Sen­ate Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee’s ap­prov­al Tues­day of a bill that would stop states from la­beling foods con­tain­ing ge­net­ic­ally mod­i­fied or­gan­isms and re­quire the Ag­ri­cul­ture De­part­ment to set up a vol­un­tary la­beling pro­gram is a ma­jor vic­tory for the farm­ers, food com­pan­ies, and re­tail­ers that op­pose la­beling. But it is only a minor move in a much lar­ger battle over con­sumer re­ac­tion to the in­dus­tri­al­iz­a­tion of the food sup­ply.

Ge­net­ic­ally modi­fy­ing a plant or an­im­al by tak­ing a gene from one spe­cies and put­ting it in an­oth­er is con­tro­ver­sial. Sci­ent­ists say the food from this pro­cess is safe and should not re­quire a la­bel, while op­pon­ents, in­clud­ing the or­gan­ic food in­dustry, say con­sumers have the right to know what is in their food.

The bill, writ­ten by Sen­ate Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee Chair­man Pat Roberts of Kan­sas, passed the com­mit­tee by a big mar­gin—14 to 6. Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, the rank­ing Demo­crat on the com­mit­tee, voted against the Roberts bill and said she be­lieves fed­er­al la­beling should be man­dat­ory. But Stabenow said she be­lieves a bill can pass the Sen­ate. The House has passed its own meas­ure, but is ex­pec­ted to con­cur with the Sen­ate bill. Roberts said he be­lieves Pres­id­ent Obama would sign his bill.

The de­cision of three Demo­crat­ic sen­at­ors—Joe Don­nelly of In­di­ana, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, and Amy Klobuchar of Min­nesota—to join all the com­mit­tee Re­pub­lic­ans in sup­port­ing the meas­ure came as a sur­prise.

But Klobuchar’s de­cision to be the Demo­crats’ spokes­wo­man on the bill was a shock. Klobuchar is re­garded as a lib­er­al with a base in Min­neapol­is, St. Paul, and Du­luth, but Min­nesota is also a big ag state, home to many food com­pan­ies as well as farms. Klobuchar said she would vote to ad­vance it be­cause of the costs that la­beling would im­pose on the eco­nomy, and be­cause of her be­lief in sci­ence. Klobuchar said she be­lieves in the con­sumers’ right to know but that con­sumers “have the right to know … what we are deal­ing with is a safe product.”

Klobuchar may have made her strongest ar­gu­ment when she noted that the Ver­mont la­beling law, which would go in­to ef­fect on Ju­ly 1, ex­empts dairy, the state’s biggest ag­ri­cul­tur­al product, but la­beling laws in neigh­bor­ing Maine and Con­necti­c­ut do not ex­empt dairy.

“We can­not have this patch­work of laws,” she said.

Klobuchar and Don­nelly are work­ing on a bill that would re­quire the Ag­ri­cul­ture De­part­ment to es­tab­lish a vol­un­tary na­tion­al bioen­gin­eer­ing food-la­beling stand­ard with­in one year.

But Heitkamp said she doesn’t know if the vol­un­tary stand­ard “is enough” and that the com­mit­tee would be wrong “if we think this de­bate is over after we take this vote and go to the [Sen­ate] floor.”

Heitkamp noted that polls show 90 per­cent of North Dakotans want GMO la­beling. “We can say they don’t know what they are talk­ing about, but I usu­ally don’t say that to my con­stitu­ents,” she said.

The prob­lem, Heitkamp ad­ded, is that “we use sci­entif­ic stud­ies and all Amer­ic­ans hear is ‘blah, blah, blah.’” Gro­cery com­pan­ies con­tin­ue to re­spond to con­sumer de­mands for more in­form­a­tion, she said.

Klobuchar, Heitkamp, and Stabenow all have a heightened in­terest in ge­net­ic modi­fic­a­tion be­cause they rep­res­ent sug­ar-beet grow­ers who are us­ing ge­net­ic­ally mod­i­fied seed. Beet sug­ar de­liv­er­ies are down 9.5 per­cent in the last three months, while cane sug­ar sales have ris­en as Her­shey’s and oth­er com­pan­ies shift to cane sug­ar, which is not ge­net­ic­ally mod­i­fied.

Last week, at the In­ter­na­tion­al Sweeten­er Col­loqui­um, a meet­ing of in­dus­tri­al sug­ar users, in Aven­tura, Flor­ida, Duane Grant, a sug­ar-beet grow­er from Idaho, pleaded with the rep­res­ent­at­ives of branded food com­pan­ies to tell con­sumers that ge­net­ic­ally mod­i­fied sug­ar beets are bet­ter for the en­vir­on­ment be­cause they use less wa­ter and pesti­cides and pro­duce high­er yields.

The cane com­pan­ies are now quite will­ing to ex­ploit what they be­lieve con­sumers see as pur­ity, even though sci­ent­ists say there is no dif­fer­ence between beet and cane sug­ar. C&H, a cane sug­ar brand in Cali­for­nia, has be­gun mar­ket­ing its sug­ar as “Non-GMO” and free of beet sug­ar. One cane re­finer said his com­pany wants to la­bel its sug­ar as GMO-free, but the line for cer­ti­fic­a­tion from the Non-GMO Pro­ject is so long it may take a year be­fore the com­pany can make that claim.

Charlie Arnot of the Cen­ter for Food In­teg­rity, a group that con­sults with food com­pan­ies on com­mu­nic­a­tions with con­sumers, told the sweeten­er users that GMOs are a sym­bol of con­sumers’ dis­trust of Big Food.

The Co­ali­tion for Safe Af­ford­able Food, the in­dustry group that op­poses man­dat­ory la­beling, said Tues­day, “We see no ma­jor road bumps that will slow the mo­mentum at our backs.”

Big Food may be right that Con­gress will pass a bill ban­ning state la­beling and send it to Obama, but Heitkamp is right that the con­sumer de­mands will con­tin­ue—and that the com­pan­ies will con­tin­ue to be­lieve the cus­tom­er is al­ways right.

What We're Following See More »
TWO YEARS BEFORE HE JOINED TRUMP CAMPAIGN
FBI Interviewed Manafort in 2013, 2014
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort was interviewed by the FBI twice while he was working as a political consultant for a Ukrainian political party—several years before he was named a top adviser to Donald Trump, newly filed court documents revealed." His deputy Rick Gates was also interviewed in 2014. "The information raises fresh questions about how closely the Trump campaign vetted staff members and whether Manafort and Gates told officials about their interactions with the FBI."

Source:
“WHAT DO YOU NEED THIS FOR?”
Trump Gives Ronny Jackson an Out
8 hours ago
THE LATEST
CAN STILL BE BRIEFED
Sessions Will Not Recuse Himself from Cohen Investigation
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
DESIGNED TO THWART PATENT TROLLS
SCOTUS Upholds Patent Review Legislation
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a new government process for challenging the validity of patents, cementing a method that technology companies have used to knock out patent protections for more than a thousand claimed inventions. The court, in a 7-2 ruling written by Justice Clarence Thomas, affirmed the constitutionality of the new process, created by Congress in 2011 to offer a quicker and cheaper process for challenging patents before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, instead of going to court."

Source:
HOUSE ENERGY AND COMMERCE MARKS UP BILL TOMORROW
Senate HELP Unanimously Passes Opioid Bill
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login