Against the Grain

Will Rubio’s Assault on Trump Pay Off Tuesday?

The Floridian needs a victory somewhere to keep his candidacy alive.

Marco Rubio poses with energized supporters.
AP Photo/Jae C. Hong
Feb. 28, 2016, 9:45 a.m.

If Marco Ru­bio’s dom­in­ant de­bate per­form­ance, re­lent­less mock­ing of Don­ald Trump’s ap­pear­ance, and in­creased scru­tiny of Trump’s busi­ness re­cord don’t give the sen­at­or from Flor­ida mo­mentum on Su­per Tues­day, it’s hard to see how he wins the GOP nom­in­a­tion. Ab­sent fresh polling, there are signs that Ru­bio is mak­ing in­roads on the long­stand­ing front-run­ner now that he’s gone full bore against him.

Ru­bio’s at­tacks on Trump have made this seem like a two-per­son race, even though Sen. Ted Cruz will be very much alive on Su­per Tues­day. Ru­bio may not have den­ted Trump’s hardened sup­port, but it’s likely he’s picked off some Cruz back­ers. Glenn Beck and Texas Gov. Rick Perry, two top Cruz sur­rog­ates, praised Ru­bio’s de­bate per­form­ance. If oth­er Cruz sup­port­ers feel that Ru­bio gives the GOP the best shot to stop Trump, ex­pect some move­ment in Ru­bio’s dir­ec­tion.

Ru­bio is also hit­ting Trump where it hurts the most: the myth­o­logy of his busi­ness acu­men. After rais­ing ques­tions about Trump Uni­versity at the de­bate, me­dia scru­tiny fol­lowed. Trump ended up ad­dress­ing the is­sue for six minutes at an Arkan­sas rally Sat­urday. Ru­bio is also draw­ing a sharp con­trast between his earned suc­cess com­pared to the for­tune that Trump in­her­ited. By call­ing Trump a fraud and cast­ing the race as a Dav­id-versus-Go­liath fight for the fu­ture of con­ser­vat­ism, he’s gal­van­iz­ing sup­port­ers and draw­ing new Re­pub­lic­ans to the fight. The crowds at his events Sat­urday in Arkan­sas and Geor­gia were among the largest of his cam­paign.

There are some clear risks with Ru­bio’s new­found ag­gres­sion. He’s stoop­ing to Trump’s level (al­beit good-naturedly), mak­ing it seem like the two can­did­ates are en­gaged in a school­yard brawl and not a pres­id­en­tial cam­paign. In turn, Trump has gone nuc­le­ar against Ru­bio, and en­lis­ted one of the GOP’s best com­mu­nic­at­ors (Chris Christie) to his side. But with­in the party es­tab­lish­ment, both GOP mod­er­ates and con­ser­vat­ives were itch­ing for someone to chal­lenge Trump ef­fect­ively, and Ru­bio has stepped up like a box­er with noth­ing to lose.

Without new polling, me­dia cov­er­age of­ten feels like it’s fly­ing blind—and there’s been next-to-none done since the de­bate. If any­one oth­er than Trump had fared as poorly at the de­bate as he did, his polit­ic­al ca­reer would be on life sup­port. On Su­per Tues­day, Ru­bio will need to trans­late mo­mentum in­to a win some­where, with Vir­gin­ia’s primary and Min­nesota’s caucuses giv­ing him the best op­por­tun­ity for his first vic­tory. Voters in the 13 states with primar­ies and caucuses will de­term­ine if Trump still has his Te­flon ar­mor, or wheth­er Ru­bio’s last-minute bar­rage is chan­ging the tra­ject­ory of the race.


1. Hil­lary Clin­ton all but locked up the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion Sat­urday night, win­ning a com­mand­ing 74 per­cent of the vote in South Car­o­lina—thanks to her dom­in­ant per­form­ance with Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans. Mak­ing up a ma­jor­ity of the Demo­crat­ic elect­or­ate in the state, they gave Clin­ton a whop­ping 87 per­cent of their votes. If that de­gree of sup­port car­ries over to the Su­per Tues­day states in the South, Clin­ton will have com­fort­able vic­tor­ies across the board.

The biggest test for Bernie Sanders was wheth­er he could ex­pand his ap­peal with pro­gress­ive whites and mil­len­ni­als to break the Clin­ton fire­wall with minor­it­ies. Iowa and New Hamp­shire fea­ture two of the most ho­mo­gen­eous Demo­crat­ic elect­or­ates in the coun­try, and nev­er answered the cru­cial ques­tion. But with Sanders strug­gling to con­nect with non­white voters in Nevada and South Car­o­lina, it’s hard to see how he can forge a path to vic­tory—even if he re­bounds from Sat­urday’s hu­mi­li­ation.

By en­dors­ing Trump, a self-in­ter­ested Christie is bet­ting that he can be polit­ic­ally rel­ev­ant again by be­com­ing the highest-rank­ing politi­cian to sign on with the rogue can­did­ate. But if his goal is to serve as at­tor­ney gen­er­al in a fu­ture GOP pres­id­ent’s cab­in­et, he prob­ably did him­self more harm than good.  

2. Christie is es­sen­tially bet­ting that the odds of Trump win­ning the pres­id­ency are great­er than Ru­bio win­ning the GOP’s nom­in­a­tion. Even if Trump is favored to win the GOP nom­in­a­tion, his chances of de­feat­ing Clin­ton are still long (as I out­lined in my column last week). But if Ru­bio pre­vails, polls sug­gest he’d start out as a fa­vor­ite in a gen­er­al elec­tion against Clin­ton. If Ru­bio comes from be­hind to win the nom­in­a­tion, Christie’s en­dorse­ment of Trump fore­closed any op­por­tun­ity to serve in a new ad­min­is­tra­tion.  

In­deed, with many top Re­pub­lic­ans out­raged over Christie’s sur­prise Trump en­dorse­ment, it’s hard to see Christie hav­ing a polit­ic­al fu­ture after he leaves of­fice un­less Trump is in­aug­ur­ated in Janu­ary.

3. Rep. Chris Collins of New York be­came the first mem­ber of Con­gress to en­dorse Trump this week, and his own de­cision is as sur­pris­ing as the fact that Trump fi­nally re­ceived any Cap­it­ol Hill sup­port. By back­ing Trump, Collins, a former Jeb Bush sup­port­er, power­fully dis­proved the max­im that nearly every Bush back­er is plan­ning to sup­port Ru­bio.

Equally sig­ni­fic­ant is the dis­trict he rep­res­ents, an up­state New York seat in the Buf­falo area that has bled man­u­fac­tur­ing jobs over the past couple of dec­ades. Rust Belt areas like this one are Trump strong­holds, with work­ing-class voters in­tensely op­posed to free trade, and Ru­bio and Cruz will have a dif­fi­cult time cut­ting in­to the bil­lion­aire busi­ness­man’s sup­port. If Collins, a prized con­gres­sion­al re­cruit, feels com­fort­able back­ing Trump in a some­what-com­pet­it­ive seat (it voted 55 per­cent for Rom­ney in 2012), ex­pect more en­dorse­ments from law­makers if Trump con­tin­ues to rack up del­eg­ates. It’s also a sign that “blue” states with blue-col­lar con­stitu­en­cies, par­tic­u­larly New York, will be fa­vor­able to Trump on the back end of the primary cal­en­dar.

4. If Bush nev­er ran for the pres­id­ency, would Don­ald Trump even be a for­mid­able can­did­ate? It’s pos­sible that the can­did­ate run­ning as the an­ti­thes­is of Trump may have done more to boost the New York­er’s can­did­acy than any­one else. Con­sider: a) Bush’s en­trance in the race pre­ven­ted any oth­er main­stream al­tern­at­ives from get­ting at­ten­tion for months; b) his Right to Rise su­per PAC nuked the most-elect­able al­tern­at­ive in Ru­bio with mil­lions in at­tack ads while spend­ing much less against Trump; c) his can­did­acy defined the two poles of the Re­pub­lic­an Party, and gave Trump plenty of fod­der to show­case him­self as ag­gress­ively anti-Bush and be­come an anti­es­tab­lish­ment icon; d) Trump may not even have got­ten in the race if it wer­en’t for Bush cre­at­ing the pro­spect of a dyn­ast­ic coron­a­tion.

What’s amaz­ing is that Bush didn’t have enough self-aware­ness to un­der­stand that the party, after three straight anti­es­tab­lish­ment elec­tions for Re­pub­lic­ans, would not have the ap­pet­ite for an­oth­er Bush in of­fice. If Trump wins the GOP nom­in­a­tion, that mis­judg­ment will have wide-ran­ging rami­fic­a­tions for his party in the years to come.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Appointees Promoted Saudi Arabia Nuclear Sales Despite NSC Objections
4 hours ago

"Several current and former Trump administration appointees promoted sales of nuclear power plants to Saudi Arabia despite repeated objections from members of the National Security Council and other senior White House officials, according to a new report from congressional Democrats. The officials who objected included White House lawyers and H.R. McMaster, then the chief of the National Security Council. They called for a halt in the nuclear sales discussions in 2017, citing potential conflicts of interest, national security risks and legal hurdles."

Trump Will Nominate Jeffrey Byard to Lead FEMA
6 hours ago

"President Donald Trump announced Friday night that he would nominate Jeffrey Byard to head the Federal Emergency Management Agency, after FEMA head Brock Long abruptly resigned earlier this week. Currently FEMA's associate Administrator for Response and Recovery, Byard is the agency's "senior-most executive over disaster response, recovery, logistics, and field operations," according to a White House statement. Before joining FEMA in September 2017, he served in multiple positions in the Alabama Emergency Management Agency, including as executive operations officer."

Bernie Sanders Declares Bid
8 hours ago
Trump Signs Border Deal
3 days ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Trump Declares National Emergency
4 days ago

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.