The U.S. Agency for International Development — which has faced accusations of mismanagement and waste with its funding in Afghanistan — recently canceled a contract for “attractive visual images” about its work in the war-torn country.
The request — which the agency posted Monday — has since been taken off USAID’s website. But the agency called for “timely, attractive visual images,” noting that in Afghanistan “negative images flood both social and conventional media with little counter,” according to a cached Web page of the request.
The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction sorts through the more than $100 billion in funding the United States has allocated to reconstruction and relief efforts in the country. According to an audit released last month, USAID agreed to give direct assistance to seven Afghan ministries despite determining that “it could not rely on the ministries it assessed to manage donor funds without a host of mitigation measures in place.”
Donald Sampler Jr., USAID’s assistant to the administrator for the Office of Afghanistan and Pakistan Affairs, said Monday that while the media provides an accurate — but limited — view of USAID’s work in the country, he expects “the reporting will continue to be somewhat negative.”
His comments echo the agency’s request for the photography proposals, which notes that “the overwhelming majority of pictures recording that effort are negative and at least to some extent misleading.”
The Web page doesn’t note how much an individual would be paid for the photographs.
A spokesman for USAID told USA Today that the photographs are supposed to “help inform Afghans about the assistance American taxpayers are providing,” but acknowledged that “the wording of the [request] did not appropriately articulate that purpose and is being reevaluated.”
What We're Following See More »
"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.
The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."
Donald Trump's "transition team will meet next week with representatives of the tech industry, multiple sources confirmed, even as their candidate largely has been largely shunned by Silicon Valley. The meeting, scheduled for next Thursday at the offices of law and lobbying firm BakerHostetler, will include trade groups like the Information Technology Industry Council and the Internet Association that represent major Silicon Valley companies."