Could Tom Steyer’s Anti-Keystone Campaign Help Mary Landrieu? She Thinks So.

Senator Mary Landrieu (C), D-LA, speaks during a a press conference on the Keystone XL pipeline in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on February 4, 2014 in Washington, DC. Looking on are (from left): Senator Joe Manchin, D-WV, and Canada's Ambassador to the US Gary Doer. AFP PHOTO/Mandel NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
Amy Harder
Add to Briefcase
Amy Harder
Feb. 17, 2014, 3:05 p.m.

Polit­ics are turn­ing up­side down in the Louisi­ana Sen­ate race, where Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bent Mary Landrieu finds her­self un­der at­tack from a deep-pock­eted and well-con­nec­ted en­vir­on­ment­al­ist.

Tom Stey­er, a bil­lion­aire hedge-fund in­vestor turned en­vir­on­ment­al act­iv­ist, may launch an ad­vert­ising cam­paign pan­ning Landrieu for sup­port­ing the Key­stone XL pipeline. The three-term sen­at­or seek­ing reelec­tion in a state much red­der than it was six years ago says Stey­er’s cri­ti­cism could ac­tu­ally help her win.

“It would prob­ably help me in my state if he would run his ads,” Landrieu said in an in­ter­view shortly after tak­ing the gavel to the Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee last week. Her think­ing is that voters who live in a state de­pend­ent on oil and nat­ur­al gas like Louisi­ana would like a can­did­ate more if she’s fa­cing cri­ti­cism from the en­vir­on­ment­al Left for sup­port­ing a pro­ject that would foster more pet­ro­leum-re­lated en­ergy pro­duc­tion, which the 1,700-mile cross-bor­der pipeline would do.

Re­pub­lic­ans, who see win­ning Louisi­ana as a key step in their quest to re­gain con­trol of the Sen­ate, are spin­ning it the oth­er way. Rob Collins, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Sen­at­ori­al Com­mit­tee, says that Stey­er could ac­tu­ally end up help­ing Landrieu’s main GOP chal­lenger, Rep. Bill Cas­sidy, win the race.

“Hav­ing a couple mil­lion dol­lars say­ing you’re do­ing the wrong thing on the en­vir­on­ment are dog-whistle ads,” Collins said in an in­ter­view. “People who care about the en­vir­on­ment will hear it, and those who don’t will miss it.” That means, Collins con­cluded, en­vir­on­ment-minded voters may stay at home, in­stead of vot­ing for Landrieu, whom they’re “pre­dis­posed” to vote for ini­tially. “It may not show up in the pro-Cas­sidy vote, but it could have the ef­fect of vote-com­press­ing” on Landrieu’s side, Collins said.

As for Landrieu’s line of think­ing — that Stey­er could ac­tu­ally help her win — Collins said: “I could see the lo­gic. I don’t think it ac­tu­ally bears out.”

Bri­an Wil­lis, a spokes­man rep­res­ent­ing Stey­er’s su­per PAC, Nex­t­Gen Cli­mate, de­clined to com­ment for this story. He also wouldn’t con­firm when Stey­er will de­cide wheth­er to tar­get Landrieu.

Tout­ing a web­site earli­er this month, Stey­er’s group is call­ing on In­ter­net users to help choose a can­did­ate for the group to tar­get in its next TV ad. Oth­ers on the list to choose from in­clude three Sen­ate hope­fuls: Rep. Shel­ley Moore Capito, R-W.Va.; former Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Mike Rounds of South Dakota; and Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga. An­oth­er po­ten­tial tar­get is Sen. Marco Ru­bio, R-Fla., who is up for reelec­tion in 2016.

Stey­er’s pre­vi­ous ef­forts in­clude cam­paigns cri­ti­ciz­ing the op­pon­ents of now-Sen. Ed­ward Mar­key, D-Mass., and Demo­crat­ic now-Gov. Terry McAul­life of Vir­gin­ia.

As the first and so far only Demo­crat in Stey­er’s line of fire this year, Landrieu is the most in­ter­est­ing — and ris­ki­est — po­ten­tial tar­get he’s con­sidered yet. Stey­er isn’t the only bil­lion­aire tar­get­ing Louisi­ana’s seni­or sen­at­or though.

Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity, a con­ser­vat­ive or­gan­iz­a­tion fun­ded by the bil­lion­aire Koch broth­ers, has already spent $2.6 mil­lion against her, fo­cus­ing mostly on her sup­port for Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care law.

“I have bil­lion­aires on both sides, and I’m ex­actly where I should be, which is right in the middle,” Landrieu said. “I don’t think people are even­tu­ally go­ing to pay a lot of at­ten­tion to these bil­lion­aires on both sides.”

The Key­stone XL pipeline would send more than 700,000 bar­rels of oil a day from Canada’s tar sands to Gulf Coast re­finer­ies. The south­ern part of the pro­ject is already op­er­at­ing, but the top half needs ap­prov­al from the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to cross the Canada-U.S. bor­der. It’s been pending at the State De­part­ment for more than five years. A fi­nal de­cision could come as soon as this spring or sum­mer.

What We're Following See More »
Bill Murray Crashes White House Briefing Room
6 hours ago

In town to receive the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor at the Kennedy Center, Bill Murray casually strolled into the White House Briefing Room this afternoon. A spokesman said he was at the executive mansion for a chat with President Obama, his fellow Chicagoan.

CFPB Decision May Reverberate to Other Agencies
9 hours ago

"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
10 hours ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Twitter Bots Dominated First Debate
11 hours ago

Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.

Center for Public Integrity to Spin Off Journalism Arm
11 hours ago

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.